The role of leadership in driving corporate social responsibility and innovation: insights from Serbian organizations

Keywords: leadership, CSR, innovation, size, origin

Abstract


The objective of this study is to examine the impact of transformational and transactional leadership styles on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Organizational Innovation (OI) within Serbian organizations. Using responses from 204 employees across small and medium, domestic and foreign companies, the research explores how leadership behaviors influence CSR initiatives and innovative practices. Data were collected through an online survey using a structured questionnaire and analyzed in SPSS with descriptive statistics, reliability testing, and multiple regression to examine relationships. Stratified sampling was applied to ensure representation across company size and origin. Two hypotheses were tested and proven highlighting significant differences of this influence based on organizational size and origin, with transformational leadership proving more effective than transactional leadership as a predictor of CSR and OI outcomes. The research findings point to the importance of culturally aligned leadership approaches in fostering sustainable and innovative practices, offering valuable insights for leadership development in transitional economies.

References

Amir, M., Siddique, M., & Ali, K. (2022). Responsible Leadership and Business Sustainability: Exploring the Role of Corporate Social Responsibility and Managerial Discretion. Business and Society Review, 127, 701–724.

Bahta, D., Yun, J., Islam, M.R., & Ashfaq, M. (2021). Corporate social responsibility, innovation capability and firm performance: evidence from SME. Social Responsibility Journal, 17 (6), 840-860.

Changar, M., & Atan, T. (2021). The role of transformational and transactional leadership approaches on environmental and ethical aspects of CSR. Sustainability, 13 (3), 1411.

Chen, L., Zheng, W., Yang, B., & Bai, S. (2016). Transformational leadership, social capital and organizational innovation. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 37 (7), 843–859.

Christensen, L.J., Mackey, A., & Whetten, D. (2014). Taking responsibility for corporate social responsibility: The role of leaders in creating, implementing, sustaining, or avoiding socially responsible firm behaviors. The Academy of management Perspectives, 28 (2), 164–178.

Farooq. M.. Farooq. O., & Jasimuddin. S.M. (2014). “Employees response to corporate social responsibility: Exploring the role of employees” collectivist orientation’. European Management Journal. 32 (6). 916–927

Ganesh, P. , & Srivastava, K.B.L. (2024), "Role of collective organizational engagement in the emergence of innovation: a micro-foundations perspective", Evidence-based HRM, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBHRM-10-2023-0307

Hofstede. G. (1980). Culture’s Consequences – International Differences in Work-Related Values. Abridged Edition. Newbury Park, CA, USA: Sage.

Hofstede. G. (2001). Culture’s Consequences. Comparing Values. Behaviours. Institutions. and Organizations Across Nations. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage Publications.

House. R.J.., Hanges. P.J., Javidan. M., Dorfman. P.W., & Gupta. V. (2004). Leadership. culture.and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage.

Javeed, S.A., Latief, R., Jiang, T., & Ong, T.S. (2021). How environmental regulations and corporate social responsibility affect firm innovation: The moderating role of CEO power. Journal of Cleaner Production, 315, 128108.

Javeed, S.A., & Lefen, L. (2019). An analysis of corporate social responsibility and firm performance with moderating effects of CEO power and ownership structure. Sustainability, 11 (1), 248.

Joseph, N. (2023). The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Employee Engagement and Organizational Performance: A Systematic Review. SSRN Electronic Journal, available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4805695 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4805695

Khaddage-Soboh, N., Yunis, M., Imran, M., & Zeb, F. (2024). Sustainable Practices in Malaysian Manufacturing: The Influence of CSR, Transformational Leadership, and Green Organizational Culture on Environmental Performance. Economic Analysis and Policy, 82, 753-768.

Khan, R., Rehman, A.U., Fatima, A. (2009). Transformational leadership and organizational innovation: Moderated by organizational size. African Journal of Business Management, 3 (11), 678-684.

Kong, G., Kong, T.D., Qin, N. & Yu L. (2023). Ethnic Diversity, Trust and Corporate Social Responsibility: The Moderating Effects of Marketization and Language. Journal of Business Ethics, 187, 449–471.

MacKenzie, S.B., Podsakoff, P.M., & Rich, G.A. (2001). Transformational and transactional leadership and salesperson performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 29 (2), 115–134.

Mubeen, R., Han, D., Abbas, J., & Álvarez-Otero, S. (2021). The relationship between CEO duality and business firms' performance: The moderating role of firm size and corporate social responsibility. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 669715.

Nedeljković, M., Vukonjanski, J., Nikolić, M., Hadžić, O., & Šljukić, M. (2018). A comparative analysis of Serbian national culture and national cultures of some European countries by GLOBE project approach. Journal of the Geographical Institute “Jovan Cvijić” SASA, 68(3), 363–382.

Podsakoff. Ph. M., & Organ. D.W (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: problems and prospects. Journal of Management. 12 (4), 531-544.

Podsakoff. Ph. M., MacKenzie. S.B. & Fetter. R. (1993). Substitutes for leadership and the management of professionals. The Leadership Quarterly. 4 (1). 1-44. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639602200204

Podsakoff. Ph. M., Todor. W.D., Grover. R.A., & Huber. V.L. (1984). Situational moderators of leader reward and punishment behaviors: fact or fiction? Organizational Behavior and Human Performance. 34 (1). 21-63

Wang. F., Zhang. M., Das. A.K., Weng. H., & Yang. P. (2021). Aiming at the Organizational Sustainable Development: Employees’ Pro-Social Rule Breaking as Response to High Performance Expectations. Sustainability. 13 (1), 267.

Published
2026/06/09
Section
Original Scientific Paper