From awareness to action: ranking EU countries by consumer readiness to adopt sustainable products using a hybrid M–M methodology
Abstract
In light of growing economic, environmental and sustainability challenges, increasingly more attention from policymakers, companies and researchers is being devoted to consumption patterns and understanding the factors that shape consumer behavior. The adoption of sustainable products within the European Union is actively promoted through a series of policies and initiatives aligned with the principles of the circular economy, to provide consumers with more transparent and accessible information, thereby empowering them to make eco-friendly choices. Nevertheless, consumer acceptance of sustainable products appears to vary considerably and is influenced by complex interactions among diverse factors. This study examines consumer readiness for sustainable products across twenty-seven EU countries using nine indicators across three dimensions: environmental awareness, financial readiness and trust in institutional sustainability mechanisms. A hybrid MEREC–MARCOS methodology was employed for ranking countries. This novel methodological approach allows for a detailed cross-country comparison and identification of areas for improving policies that incentivize sustainable consumption across the EU. Sweden emerges as the top-ranked country, followed by Cyprus and the Netherlands, while Latvia and Estonia rank lowest. The results suggest considerable divergence among EU Member States and potentially offer valuable insight into gaps in sustainable consumer behavior.
References
Agarwal, S., & Dubey, R.S. (2024). A bibliometric and thematic review of green marketing and green consumer behavior research from 2000 to 2022. Serbian Journal of Management, 19 (1), 51-70.
Almulhim, A.I., & Abubakar, I.R. (2021). Understanding Public Environmental Awareness and Attitudes toward Circular Economy Transition in Saudi Arabia. Sustainability, 13 (18), 10157.
Arıkan Kargı, V.S. (2025). Analysis of the Performance of Companies in the Individual Pension System Using the Merec-Based Marcos Method. Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 35 (2), 685-702.
Asikis, T., Klinglmayr, J., Helbing, D., & Pournaras, E. (2021). How value sensitive design can empower sustainable consumption. Royal Society Open Science, 8 (1), 201418.
Badi, I., Pamučar, D., Stević, Ž., & Muhammad, L.J. (2023). Wind farm site selection using BWM-AHP-MARCOS method: A case study of Libya. Scientific African, 19, 01511.
Blasberg, J., van den Branden, J.-C., Morrison, H., Zehner, D., & Johns, L. (2024). The Sustainability Puzzle: What Do Consumers Really Want?. Bain & Company. Retrieved from: https://www.bain.com/insights/what-do-consumers-really-want-ceo-sustainability-guide-2024/
Boland, L.A. (2013). Model building in economics post-1980 vs. pre-1980. Filosofía de la Economía, 1 (1), 5-24.
Cheba, K., Bąk, I., Szopik-Depczyńska, K., & Ioppolo, G. (2022). Directions of green transformation of the European Union countries. Ecological Indicators, 136, 108601.
Circle Economy Foundation. (2024). The Circularity Gap Report 2024. Retrieved from: https://www.circularity-gap.world/2024
Courtat, M., Joyce, P.J., Sim, S., Sadhukhan, J., & Murphy, R. (2023). Towards credible, evidence-based environmental rating ecolabels for consumer products: A proposed framework. Journal of Environmental Management, 336, 117684.
Deák, Z. (2025). The effect of inflation on sustainable spending patterns: Evidence from Hungary. Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Management, Enterprise, Benchmarking, II, 15-20.
Deák, Z., Vaznonienė, G., & Wojewódzka Wiewiórska, A. (2024). Understanding the attitudes towards climate change in the context of trust in selected countries of Central and Eastern Europe. Serbian Journal of Management, 19 (2), 449-470.
Demir, G., Chatterjee, P., & Pamucar, D. (2024). Sensitivity analysis in multi-criteria decision making: A state-of-the-art research perspective using bibliometric analysis. Expert Systems With Applications, 237, 121660.
Dewi, S., & Ramadhani, Z. (2023). An Integrated ANP and MARCOS for Green Supplier Selection: A Case Study on Construction Industry. Jurnal Teknik Industri, 23 (2), 133-148.
European Commission, Directorate-General for Communication. (2023). Flash Eurobarometer FL535: The EU Ecolabel (v1.00) [Data set]. European Commission. http://data.europa.eu/88u/dataset/s3072_fl535_eng
European Commission, Directorate-General for Communication. (2024). Special Eurobarometer SP550: Attitudes of Europeans towards the environment (v1.00) [Data set]. European Commission. http://data.europa.eu/88u/dataset/s3173_101_2_sp550_eng
European Commission. (2024). Ecodesign for sustainable products regulation. European Commission, Directorate‑General for Environment. Retrieved from: https://commission.europa.eu/energy-climate-change-environment/standards-tools-and-labels/products-labelling-rules-and-requirements/ecodesign-sustainable-products-regulation_en
Geng, D., Liu, J., & Zhu, Q. (2017). Motivating sustainable consumption among Chinese adolescents: An empirical examination. Journal of Cleaner Production, 141, 315-322.
Ghali-Zinoubi, Z. (2022). Examining Drivers of Environmentally Conscious Consumer Behavior: Theory of Planned Behavior Extended with Cultural Factors. Sustainability, 14 (13), 8072.
Govindan, K., Rajendran, S., Sarkis, J., & Murugesan, P. (2015). Multi-criteria decision making approaches for green supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 98, 66-83.
Gregory-Smith, D., Manika, D., & Demirel, P. (2017). Green intentions under the blue flag: Exploring differences in EU consumers’ willingness to pay more for environmentally-friendly products. Business Ethics: A European Review, 26 (3), 205-222.
Hael, M., Hazaea, S. A., Zhang, H., & Mareeh, H. (2025). Mapping the literature trends of consumer behavior and sustainability: Insights from a bibliometric analysis approach. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 27(5), 9841-9871.
Han, H. (2021). Consumer behavior and environmental sustainability in tourism and hospitality: a review of theories, concepts, and latest research. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 29 (7), 1021-1042.
Hardt, L., & O'Neill, D.W. (2017). Ecological Macroeconomic Models: Assessing Current Developments. Ecological Economics, 134, 198-211.
Hu, T., Al Mamun, A., Reza, M.N., Wu, M., & Yang, Q. (2024). Examining consumers’ willingness to pay premium price for organic food. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11 (1), 1-15.
Islam, Q., & Ali Khan, S.M.F. (2024). Assessing Consumer Behavior in Sustainable Product Markets: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach with Partial Least Squares Analysis. Sustainability, 16 (8), 3400.
Joshi, Y., & Rahman, Z. (2019). Consumers' Sustainable Purchase Behaviour: Modeling the Impact of Psychological Factors. Ecological Economics, 159, 235-243.
Kara, K., Yalçın, G.C., Acar, A.Z., Simic, V., Konya, S., & Pamucar, D. (2024). The MEREC-AROMAN method for determining sustainable competitiveness levels: A case study for Turkey. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 91, 101762.
Keshavarz-Ghorabaee, M., Amiri, M., Zavadskas, E.K., Turskis, Z., & Antucheviciene, J. (2021). Determination of Objective Weights Using a New Method Based on the Removal Effects of Criteria (MEREC). Symmetry, 13 (4), 525.
Kim, N. & Lee, K. (2023). Environmental consciousness, purchase intention, and actual purchase behavior of eco-friendly products: The moderating impact of situational context. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20 (7), 5312.
Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2012). Marketing management (14th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.
Krstić, J., Rajić, T., Kostić-Stanković, M., & Vlastelica, T. (2025). Investigating female consumers’ environmentally conscious apparel purchase behaviour through Stimulus-Organism-Response framework. Serbian Journal of Management, 20 (1), 81-101.
Kumar, B., Manrai, A.K., & Manrai, L.A. (2017). Purchasing behaviour for environmentally sustainable products: A conceptual framework and empirical study. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 34, 1-9.
Lopes, E.L., & da Silva, D. (2012). Integrative Models of Consumer Behavior: A Theoretical Review. ReMark - Brazilian Journal of Marketing , 10 (3), 3-23.
Pamučar, D.S., Božanić, D., & Ranđelović, A. (2017). Multi-criteria decision making: An example of sensitivity analysis. Serbian journal of management, 12 (1), 1-28.
Paz, M.D.R., & Vargas, J.C.R. (2023). Main theoretical consumer behavioural models. A review from 1935 to 2021. Heliyon, 9 (3), 23011027.
Pelit, İ., & Avşar, İ.İ. (2025). Turkiye’s Carbon Emission Profile: A Global Analysis with the MEREC-PROMETHEE Hybrid Method. Sustainability, 17 (14), 6527.
Plotnic, O., Popescu, L., Vilela, N.B., & Oplotnik, Ž.J. (2024). Intergovernmental coordination for a sustainable development of entrepreneurial activity in the Republic of Moldova. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8 (7), 4765.
PwC. (2024). Consumers willing to pay 9.7% sustainability premium, even as cost-of-living and inflationary concerns weigh: PwC 2024 Voice of the Consumer Survey. PwC Global. Retrieved from: https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/news-room/press-releases/2024/pwc-2024-voice-of-consumer-survey.html
Raghavendra, & Diddimani, M. (2025). Determinants of Green Consumer Behavior: Psychological, Social, Economic, and Contextual Factors. Asian Review of Social Sciences, 14 (1), 1-6.
Sahoo, S.K., & Goswami, S.S. (2023). A comprehensive review of multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods: Advancements, applications, and future directions. Decision Making Advances, 1 (1), 25-48.
Sarıgül, S.S., Ünlü, M., & Yaşar, E. (2023). A new MCDM approach in evaluating airport service quality: MEREC-based MARCOS and CoCoSo methods. Uluslararası Yönetim Akademisi Dergisi, 6 (1), 90-108.
Sheoran, M., & Kumar, D. (2022). Benchmarking the barriers of sustainable consumer behaviour. Social Responsibility Journal, 18 (1), 19-42.
Sijtsema, S.J., Snoek, H.M., van Haaster-de Winter, M.A., & Dagevos, H. (2020). Let’s Talk about Circular Economy: A Qualitative Exploration of Consumer Perceptions. Sustainability, 12 (1), 286.
Sivarajah, R. (2024). Exploring the impact of psychological and social factors on green consumer behaviour: a comprehensive review of green marketing tactics. SN Business & Economics, 4, 154.
Soyer, M., & Dittrich, K. (2021). Sustainable Consumer Behavior in Purchasing, Using and Disposing of Clothes. Sustainability, 13 (15), 8333.
Stević, Ž., Pamučar, D., Puška, A., & Chatterjee, P. (2020). Sustainable supplier selection in healthcare industries using a new MCDM method: Measurement of alternatives and ranking according to COmpromise solution (MARCOS). Computers & Industrial Engineering, 140, 106231.
Sun, Z.Q., & Yoon, S.J. (2021). What Makes People Pay Premium Price for Eco-Friendly Products? The Effects of Ethical Consumption Consciousness, CSR, and Product Quality. Sustainability, 14 (23), 15513.
Syed, S., Acquaye, A., Khalfan, M.M., Obuobisa-Darko, T., & Yamoah, F.A. (2024). Decoding sustainable consumption behavior: A systematic review of theories and models and provision of a guidance framework. Resources, Conservation & Recycling Advances, 23, 200232.
Šostar, M., & Ristanović, V. (2023). An Assessment of the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Consumer Behavior Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process Model. Sustainability, 15 (20), 15104.
Šostar, M., & Ristanović, V. (2024). Evaluating Consumer Preferences for Sustainable Products: A Comparative Study Across Five Countries. World, 5 (4), 1248-1266.
Taufique, K., & Vaithianathan, S. (2018). A fresh look at understanding Green consumer behavior among young urban Indian consumers through the lens of Theory of Planned Behavior. Journal of Cleaner Production, 183, 46-55.
Van Bussel, L., Kuijsten, A., Mars, M., & Van ‘t Veer, P. (2022). Consumers’ perceptions on food-related sustainability: A systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 341, 130904.
Wang, H., Zeng, J., Gao, X., Wang, H., & Xiao, J. (2024). SpatMCDA: An R package for assessing areas at risk of infectious diseases based on spatial multi-criteria decision analysis. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 15, 1302-1311.
White, K., Habib, R., & Hardisty, D. (2019). How to SHIFT Consumer Behaviors to be More Sustainable: A Literature Review and Guiding Framework. Journal of Marketing, 83 (3), 22 - 49.
Więckowski, J., & Sałabun, W. (2023). Sensitivity analysis approaches in multi-criteria decision analysis: A systematic review. Applied Soft Computing, 148, 110915.
Wurster, S., & Schulze, R. (2020). Consumers’ Acceptance of a Bio-circular Automotive Economy: Explanatory Model and Influence Factors. Sustainability, 12 (6), 2186.
Zannakis, M., Molander, S., & Johansson, L. (2019). On the Relationship between Pro-Environmental Behavior, Experienced Monetary Costs, and Psychological Gains. Sustainability, 11 (19), 5467.
The Author wishes to submit the Work to SJM for publication. To enable SJM to publish the Work and to give effect to the parties’ intention set forth herein, they have agreed to cede the first right to publication and republication in the SJM Journal.
Cession
The Author hereby cedes to SJM, who accepts the cession, to the copyright in and to the paper.
The purpose of the cession is to enable SJM to publish the Work, as first publisher world-wide, and for republication in the SJM Journal, and to grant the right to others to publish the Work world-wide, for so long as such copyright subsists;
SJM shall be entitled to edit the work before publication, as it deems fit, subject to the Authors approval
The Author warrants to SJM that:
- the Author is the owner of the copyright in the Work, whether as author or as reassigned from the Author’s employee and that the Author is entitled to cede the copyright to SJM;
- the paper (or any of its part) is not submitted or accepted for publication in any other Journal;
- the Work is an original work created by the Author;
- the Author has not transferred, ceded, or assigned the copyright, or any part thereof, to any third party; or granted any third party a licence or other right to the copyright, which may affect or detract from the rights granted to SJM in terms of this agreement.
The Author hereby indemnifies the SJM as a body and its individual members, to the fullest extent permitted in law, against all or any claims which may arise consequent to the warranties set forth.
No monetary consideration shall be payable by SJM to the Author for the cession, but SJM shall clearly identify the Author as having produced the Work and ensure that due recognition is given to the Author in any publication of the Work.
Should SJM, in its sole discretion, elect not to publish the Work within 1 year after the date of this agreement, the cession shall lapse and be of no further effect. In such event the copyright shall revert to the Author and SJM shall not publish the Work, or any part thereof, without the Author’s prior written consent.