Bayesian inference for risk assessment of the position of study program within the integrated university: a case study of engineering management at technical faculty in Bor

  • Marija Savic University of Belgrade, Technical Faculty in Bor, Management department
  • Predrag Djordjevic
  • Djordje Nikolic
  • Ivan Mihajlovic
  • Zivan Zivkovic

Abstract


This paper defines issues involved with the Integrated University (IU) from the aspect of the positioning of study program (SP) as the basic component of modern IU. Model for the risk assesment of the SP position in IU is developed on the principles of Bayes' theorem of conditional probability. In the proposed model, a priori probability is updated with previous events (evidence nodes) ei, whose occurrence caused a final posterior probability of the position of SP in IU. Defined model was developed based on the example of SP - Engineering management  (EM) within the Technical Faculty in Bor, in order to assess the probability of its position in the future IU in Belgrade. The results show that SP-EM has a probability above 99% with its current structure and new activities, to be a part of the IUB. Defined model has a universal character and can be applied to analyze the posterior probability of any SP's position and risk assesment with the variation of the number and content of the evidence nodes ei.

References

Anderson, R.D., & Vastag, G. (2004). Causal modelling alternatives in operations research: Overview and application. European Journal of Operational Research, 156(1), 92-109.

Bernardo, J.M., & Smith, A.F.M. (2000). Bayesian Theory, Wiley, New York.

Chen, S.H., & Pollino, C.A. (2012). Good practice in Bayesian network modeling. Environmental Modelling & Software, 37, 134-145.

Cooper, P. (2007). Knowing your “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty in UK Higher Education. Quality in Higher Education, 13(1), 19-29.

EU Directive, 2013/0081 (COD).

Florian, R.V. (2007). Irreproducibility of the results of the Shanghai academic ranking of world universities. Scientometrics, 72(1), 25-32.

Garvey, R.P. (2009). Analytical methods for risk management. CRS Press, New York.

Huang, M. H. (2012). Opening the black box of QS World University Rankings. Research Evaluation, 21(1), 71-78.

Jaynes, E.T. (2003). Probability Theory: The logic of Science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Kalina, J. (2014). On robust information extraction from high-dimensional data. Serbian Journal of Management, 9(1), 131-144.

Khan, M.N., & Adil., M, (2013). Data analysis techniques in service quality literature: Essentials and Advanced. Serbian Journal of Management, 8(1), 95-112.

Maslow, A.H. (1943). A Theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370-396.

O'Hagan, A., & West, M. (2010). The Handbook of Applied Bayesian Analysis. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Ordonez Galan, C., Matias, J.M., Rivas, T., Bastante, F.G. (2009). Reforestation planning using Bayesian network. Environmental Modelling & Software, 24, 1285–1292.

Sando, S., & Ferenčak, M. (2012). Alumni indicator as a criterion for evaluating the Quality of Academic Institution. International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 3(2), 113-119.

Shay, S.K., & Bakar, K.S. (2012). A comparison of Bayesian models for daily ozone concentration levels. Statistical Methodology, 9, 144-157.

Published
2014/06/17
Section
Original Scientific Paper