The analysis of productivity and profitability in the CEE region: Focus on the private and public sector

  • Kristina Mijić Univerzitet u Novom Sadu Ekonomski fakultet u Subotici Departman za finansije, bankarstvo, računovodstvo i reviziju
  • Dejan Jakšić Univerzitet u Novom Sadu Ekonomski fakultet u Subotici Departman za finansije, bankarstvo, računovodstvo i reviziju
  • Nemanja Berber Univerzitet u Novom Sadu Ekonomski fakultet u Subotici Departman za menadžment
Keywords: analysis of profitability, CRANET, Public Sector, private sector, CEE region, analysis of productivity,

Abstract


This paper presents a comparative analysis of productivity and profitability of companies of the private and public sector from selected countries of Central and Eastern Europe (CEE). The research is based on the data of productivity and profitability from "Cranet" project. The results of analysis indicate a statistically significant difference in the level of productivity and profitability between these two sectors, so that private sector has significantly higher level of productivity and profitability than the public sector companies. Analysis according to the individual countries also points to a significantly higher level of productivity and profitability in the private sector, except in Slovenia where the public sector companies have a better level only of productivity compared to the private sector.

Author Biography

Nemanja Berber, Univerzitet u Novom Sadu Ekonomski fakultet u Subotici Departman za menadžment
Department of Management

References

Anderson, S., Ilea, D., & Shi, L. (2005). Productivity Measurement in the Public Sector. Case Study: New York City`s Agencie. New York: New York City`s Office of Management and Budget.

Andrašić, J. (2012). Increasing the Efficiency of the Company Using a Strategic Approach to Cost Management. Annals of the Faculty of Economics in Suboticai, 28, 239-250.

Boubraki, N., & Cosset, J. (1998). The Financial and Operating Performance of Newly-Privatized Firms: Evidence from Developing Countries. Journal of Finance, 53, 1081-1110.

Brewster, C., Mayrhofer, W., & Reichel, A. (2011). Riding the tiger? Going along with Cranet for two decades - A relational perspective. Human Resource Management Review, 21 (1), 5-15.

Ernst, U., Edwards, N., Gladstone, D., Gregory, P., & Holt, T. (1999). Assessing the Impacts of Privatization: The Experience of Morocco. Washington: USAID.

Field, A. (2009). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. London: Sage Publication.

Khan, I. (2006). Public vs. Private Sector: an Examination of Neo-Liberal Ideology. Munich: MPRA.

Kikeri, S., & Nellis, J. (2002). Privatization in Competitive Sectors: The Record So Far. Washington: World Bank.

Kimmel, P., Weygandt, J., Kieso, D., & Trenholm, B. (2009). Financial Accounting. Ontario: John Wiley & Sons.

Majumdar, S. (1998). Assessing Comparative Efficiency of the State-Owned, Mixed, and Private Sectors in the Indian Industry. Public Choice, 96 (1-2), 1-24.

Megginson, W.L., Nash, R.C., & Van Randenborgh, M. (1994). The Financial and Operating Performance of Newly Privatized Firms: An International Empirical Analysis. Journal of Finance, 49, 403-452.

Saygili, S., & Taymaz, E. (2001). Privatization, Ownership and Technical Efficiency: A Study of the Turkish Cement Industry. Annals of Public and Co-operative Economics, 72 (4), 581-605.

The Cranfield Network on International Human Resource Management (Cranet). (2012). Data Base, www.cranet.org.

World Bank. (1995). Bureaucrats in Business: The Economics and Politics of Government Ownership. New York: Oxford University Press.

Published
2015/04/04
Section
Original Scientific Paper