Ideje o globalizaciji u časopisu Sociološki pregled: mogućnosti primene Heldove podele škola mišlјenja
Sažetak
Čovečanstvo je prošlo kroz nekoliko faza razvoja globalne svesti, određenih u zavisnosti od istorijskog ispolјavanja intenziteta procesa globalizacije u osnovnim oblastima društva. Naučno interesovanje za globalizaciju traje tek nekoliko decenija i izražava se kroz različite teorijske perspektive o globalizaciji. Iako je u mnogim teorijskim modelima postalo uobičajeno da se skup ideja o globalizaciji najčešće deli na skepticizam i hiperglobalizam, a ređe na transformacionizam, ostalo je otvoreno pitanje da li je i spisak osnovnih argumenata iz radova autora koji se bave ovom temom u skladu sa podelom škola mišlјenja Dejvida Helda (David Held). Kako bi se opisala idejna raznovrsnost globalizacije u Srbiji, u prvom delu ovog teksta je analizirano pojmlјenje procesa globalizacije u radovima objavlјenim u časopisu Sociološki pregled, dok su u drugom delu teksta izloženi nalazi o mogućnosti primene podele škola mišlјenja o globalizaciji Dejvida Helda i njegovih saradnika. U skladu sa cilјevima istraživanja, primenjen je metod analize sadržaja, pri čemu je konstruisan i model kodiranja podataka prema deduktivnoj strategiji. Ovaj rad upućuje na zaklјučak da su samo neki od kriterijuma ove podele relevantni za razlikovanje ideja o globalizaciji na domaćem sociološkom području.
Reference
Albrow, M., Eade, J., Washbourne, N., & Durrschmidt, J. (1994). The impact of globalization on sociological concepts: Community, culture and milieu. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 7(4), 371-–389. doi:10.1080/13511610.1994.9968418
Avramović, Z. (2006). The contradictions of democracy globalization. Sociološki pregled, 40(1), 115–125. doi:10.5937/socpreg0601115a
Avramović, Z. (2010). Miodrag Ranković, Globalization and new imperialism, Izdanje autora, Beograd, 2009. Sociološki pregled, 44(2), 349-356. Available at http://scindeksclanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0085-6320/2010/0085-63201002349A.pdf [In Serbian]
Avramović, Z. (2012). ’Brain drain’ from Serbia - One face of globalization of education. Sociološki pregled, 46(2). 189–202. doi:10.5937/socpreg1202189A [In Serbian]
Božilović, N. (2014). Globalization of culture and new identity patterns. Sociološki pregled, 48(4), 531–548. doi:10.5937/socpreg1404531b [In Serbian]
Branković, S. (2009). Methods of experiential research of social phenomena. Beograd: Univerzitet Megatrend. [In Serbian]
Branković, S. (2014). Methodology of social research. Beograd: Zavod za udžbenike [In Serbian]
Brdar, M. (2002). Globalization and sovereignty decline: Regionalization problem in Serbia within the actual geopolitical context. Sociološki pregled, 36(1–2), 57–80. doi:10.5937/socpreg0201057b [In Serbian]
Brzezinski, Z. (2013). Strategic vision: America and the crisis of global power. Beograd: Albatros plus [In Serbian]
Chumakov, A.N. (2010). Philosophy of globalization. Moscow: MAKS Press. Available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279866764_Philosophy_of_Globalization_Selected_Articles_-_Moscow_MAKS_Press_2010_-_188_p.
Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
Fukuyama, F. (2002). The end of history and the last man. Podgorica: CID. [In Serbian]
Gidens, E. (2005). Runaway world: How globalization is reshaping our lives. Beograd: Stubovi kulture [In Serbian]
Held, D. (2003). The globalization debate. U V. Vuletić (ed), Globalization: Myth or reality (pp 48-60). Beograd: Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva [In Serbian]
Hsieh, H., & Shannon, S.E. (2005). Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. doi:10.1177/10497323052-76687
Jokić, A., & Dickson, T. (2006). Globalization and genocidalism: Fictional discourse without borders, for fun and profit. Sociološki pregled, 40 (3), 323–346. doi:10.5937/socpreg0603323j
Kavan, J. (1989). Co-operation across the border. Sociološki pregled, 23(1–2), 101–110. Available at http://www.socioloskipregled.org.rs/2017/08/23/socioloski-pregled-1989/ [In Serbian].
Lukić, R. (1957). Introduction to sociology. Beograd: Savez Udruženja pravnika Jugoslavije. [In Serbian]
Lukić, R. (1974). Sociology of morality. Beograd: Srpska akademija nauka i umetnosti [In Serbian]
Michael, B. (2003). Theorising the politics of globalisation: a critique of Held et al.‘s ”transformationalism”. Journal of Economic and Social Research, 4(2), 3–17. Available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/251736030_Theorising_the_Politics_of_Globalisation_A_Critique_of_Held_et_al’s_Transformationalism.
Milić, V. (1978). Theoretical and content orientation of researches in the field of sociology. Sociološki pregled, 12(1–2), 113–121. Available at http://www.socioloskipregled.org.rs/2017/08/20/socioloski-pregled-1978/ [In Serbian]
Milić, V. (2014).Sociological method. Belgrade: Zavod za udžbenike (Fourth edition). [In Serbian]
Mišković, M. (2005). Zoran Vidojević, Where does globalization lead, ”Filip Višnjić”, Beograd, 2005. Sociološki pregled, 39 (3), 349-353. Available at http://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0085-6320/2005/0085-63200503349M.pdf [In Serbian]
Mitrović, Lj. (2012). Miroslav Pečujlić’s contribution to contemporary sociology of development and globalization. Sociološki pregled, (Special Edition), 46 (2), 485-498. Available at http://www.socioloskipregled.org.rs/2017/08/18/socioloski-pregledgod-xlvi-2012-sv-2/ [In Serbian]
Mladenović, M., Ponomareva, J., & Kilibarda, Z. (2012). Theory and practice of ’colorful’ revolutions. Sociološki pregled, 46 (4), 513-533. doi:10.5937/socpreg1204513m
Mladenović, M., & Ponomareva, J. (2011). China-United States-Russia: The global triangle of the 21st century. Sociološki pregled, 45 (4), 459–476. doi:10.5937/socpreg1104459m
Moore, D. (1980). Modernization and boundaries of convergence. Sociološki pregled, 14(1), 51-60. Available at http://www.socioloskipregled.org.rs/2017/08/20/socioloski-pregled-1980/ [In Serbian]
Nechiporenko, O, Samsonov, V. (2016). Russian countryside: Stages of change, adaption to reforms and new global challenges. Sociološki pregled, 50(4), 511–526. doi:10.5937/socpreg1604511n
Opalić, P. (2008). Relationship between psychiatry and politics. Sociološki pregled, 42(3), 385–400. doi:10.5937/socpreg0803385o [In Serbian]
Petrović, J. (2014). Note on the so-called new French sociology and its methodological consequences - a review of the most important issues. U J. Petrović & D. Đođrević (eds), Research of social phenomena: Methodological considerations (pp 213–222). Niš: Filozofski fakultet Univerziteta u Nišu, Mašinski fakultet Univerziteta u Nišu. [In Serbian]
Petrović, M. (1972). Geopolitics of hunger and aid to underdeveloped countries. Sociološki pregled, 5(1-2), 97–125. Available at http://www.socioloskipregled.org.rs/2017/08/20/socioloski-pregled-1972/ [In Serbian]
Popić, S. (2012). The beginnings of Serbian sociological thought on globalization. Sociološki pregled,(Special Edition), 46(3–4), 1116–1133. Available at http://www.socioloskipregled.org.rs/2017/08/18/socioloski-pregled-god-xlvi-2012-sv-3-4/ [In Serbian]
Popić, S, Šuvaković, U. (2014). Academician Radomir D. Lukić - the forerunner of the study of globalization in Serbia. Teme, 38(1), 377–390. Available at http://teme2.junis.ni.ac.rs/public/journals/1/previousissues/teme1-2014/teme%201-2014-20.pdf [In Serbian]
Prošić, S. (2015). Globalisation vs. fragmentation of space. Sociološki pregled, 49(3), 313–324. doi:10.5937/socpreg1503313p [In Serbian]
Pušić, Lј. (2013). Environmental sociology as the broadest framework for a research of the globalizing social reality. Sociološki pregled, 47(2), 171–187. doi:10.5937/socpreg1302171p [In Serbian]
Ranković, M. (2002). Defining of word: Global hegemony. Sociološki pregled, 36(3–4), 323–376. doi:10.5937/socpreg0203323r [In Serbian]
Ranković, M. (2012). Evolution and involution of the new imperialism. Sociološki pregled, (Special Edition), 46(3-4), Available at http://www.socioloskipregled.org.rs/2017/08/18/socioloski-pregled-god-xlvi-2012-sv-3-4/ [In Serbian]
Skler, L. (2003). Competing conceptions of globalization. U V. Vuletić (ed), Globalization: Myth or reality (pp. 31–47). Beograd: Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva. [In Serbian]
Skot, A. (2003). Globalization: social process or political rhetoric. U V. Vuletić (ed), Globalization: Myth or reality (pp 31-47). Beograd: Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva [In Serbian]
Tadić, T. (2005). A contribution to (re)conceptualization and genesis of globalization. Privredna izgradnja, 48(3–4), 187–210. doi:10.2298/priz0504187t
Tadić, T. (2006). The globalization debate: The globalists. Panoeconomicus, 53(1), 51–63. doi:10.2298/pan0601051t
Tadić, T. (2006). The globalization debate: The skeptics. Panoeconomicus, 53(2), 179–190. doi:10.2298/PAN0602179T
Tripković, M. (2000). Globalization and Serbia. Sociološki pregled, 34(3-4), 61-74. doi:10.5937/socpreg0003061t [In Serbian]
Trkulja, J. (2012). Scientific-educational and public activity of Miroslav Pečujlić. Sociološki pregled, (Special Edition), 46(2), 445–484. Available at http://www.socioloskipregled.org.rs/2017/08/18/socioloski-pregled-god-xlvi-2012-sv-2/ [In Serbian]
Ćirić, J. (2000). Anti-humanism of the human rights ideology. Sociološki pregled, 34(1–2), 69–88. doi:10.5937/socpreg0001069c [In Serbian]
Čičkarić, L. (2003). Construction of political identity within the globalization and social transition. Sociološki pregled, 37(1–2), 79–99. doi:10.5937/socpreg0302079c [In Serbian]