Ideas about globalization in Sociološki pregled/ Sociological review: The possibility of applying David Held et al's division into three schools of thought
Abstract
Humankind has gone through several stages of growth of global awareness, which can be divided depending on the historical manifestation of the intensity of globalization in the main areas of society. Te scientifc interest in globalization has lasted for several decades, and it is expressed through different theoretical perspectives on globalization. Although it has become commonplace in many theoretical models to divide the set of ideas about globalization into skepticism and hyperglobalism, more rarely transformationalism, the question of whether the list of main arguments in works of such authors complies with D. Held’s division remains open. In order to describe the conceptual diversity of globalization in Serbia, the frst part of this paper presents an analysis of ideas about globalization from the journal ’Sociološki pregled/ Sociological Review’, while the second part considers data on the possibility of applying David Held et. al’s division into three schools of thought about globalization: skeptics, hyperglobalizers and transformationalists. In accordance with the set of objectives of the research, this paper applies the method of content analysis, whereby the data coding model is constructed in a deductive strategy. Tis paper concludes that only a few of the criteria of this division are relevant for distinguishing the ideas of globalization in the domestic sociological feld.
References
Albrow, M., Eade, J., Washbourne, N., & Durrschmidt, J. (1994). The impact of globalization on sociological concepts: Community, culture and milieu. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 7(4), 371-–389. doi:10.1080/13511610.1994.9968418
Avramović, Z. (2006). The contradictions of democracy globalization. Sociološki pregled, 40(1), 115–125. doi:10.5937/socpreg0601115a
Avramović, Z. (2010). Miodrag Ranković, Globalization and new imperialism, Izdanje autora, Beograd, 2009. Sociološki pregled, 44(2), 349-356. Available at http://scindeksclanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0085-6320/2010/0085-63201002349A.pdf [In Serbian]
Avramović, Z. (2012). ’Brain drain’ from Serbia - One face of globalization of education. Sociološki pregled, 46(2). 189–202. doi:10.5937/socpreg1202189A [In Serbian]
Božilović, N. (2014). Globalization of culture and new identity patterns. Sociološki pregled, 48(4), 531–548. doi:10.5937/socpreg1404531b [In Serbian]
Branković, S. (2009). Methods of experiential research of social phenomena. Beograd: Univerzitet Megatrend. [In Serbian]
Branković, S. (2014). Methodology of social research. Beograd: Zavod za udžbenike [In Serbian]
Brdar, M. (2002). Globalization and sovereignty decline: Regionalization problem in Serbia within the actual geopolitical context. Sociološki pregled, 36(1–2), 57–80. doi:10.5937/socpreg0201057b [In Serbian]
Brzezinski, Z. (2013). Strategic vision: America and the crisis of global power. Beograd: Albatros plus [In Serbian]
Chumakov, A.N. (2010). Philosophy of globalization. Moscow: MAKS Press. Available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279866764_Philosophy_of_Globalization_Selected_Articles_-_Moscow_MAKS_Press_2010_-_188_p.
Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
Fukuyama, F. (2002). The end of history and the last man. Podgorica: CID. [In Serbian]
Gidens, E. (2005). Runaway world: How globalization is reshaping our lives. Beograd: Stubovi kulture [In Serbian]
Held, D. (2003). The globalization debate. U V. Vuletić (ed), Globalization: Myth or reality (pp 48-60). Beograd: Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva [In Serbian]
Hsieh, H., & Shannon, S.E. (2005). Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. doi:10.1177/10497323052-76687
Jokić, A., & Dickson, T. (2006). Globalization and genocidalism: Fictional discourse without borders, for fun and profit. Sociološki pregled, 40 (3), 323–346. doi:10.5937/socpreg0603323j
Kavan, J. (1989). Co-operation across the border. Sociološki pregled, 23(1–2), 101–110. Available at http://www.socioloskipregled.org.rs/2017/08/23/socioloski-pregled-1989/ [In Serbian].
Lukić, R. (1957). Introduction to sociology. Beograd: Savez Udruženja pravnika Jugoslavije. [In Serbian]
Lukić, R. (1974). Sociology of morality. Beograd: Srpska akademija nauka i umetnosti [In Serbian]
Michael, B. (2003). Theorising the politics of globalisation: a critique of Held et al.‘s ”transformationalism”. Journal of Economic and Social Research, 4(2), 3–17. Available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/251736030_Theorising_the_Politics_of_Globalisation_A_Critique_of_Held_et_al’s_Transformationalism.
Milić, V. (1978). Theoretical and content orientation of researches in the field of sociology. Sociološki pregled, 12(1–2), 113–121. Available at http://www.socioloskipregled.org.rs/2017/08/20/socioloski-pregled-1978/ [In Serbian]
Milić, V. (2014).Sociological method. Belgrade: Zavod za udžbenike (Fourth edition). [In Serbian]
Mišković, M. (2005). Zoran Vidojević, Where does globalization lead, ”Filip Višnjić”, Beograd, 2005. Sociološki pregled, 39 (3), 349-353. Available at http://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0085-6320/2005/0085-63200503349M.pdf [In Serbian]
Mitrović, Lj. (2012). Miroslav Pečujlić’s contribution to contemporary sociology of development and globalization. Sociološki pregled, (Special Edition), 46 (2), 485-498. Available at http://www.socioloskipregled.org.rs/2017/08/18/socioloski-pregledgod-xlvi-2012-sv-2/ [In Serbian]
Mladenović, M., Ponomareva, J., & Kilibarda, Z. (2012). Theory and practice of ’colorful’ revolutions. Sociološki pregled, 46 (4), 513-533. doi:10.5937/socpreg1204513m
Mladenović, M., & Ponomareva, J. (2011). China-United States-Russia: The global triangle of the 21st century. Sociološki pregled, 45 (4), 459–476. doi:10.5937/socpreg1104459m
Moore, D. (1980). Modernization and boundaries of convergence. Sociološki pregled, 14(1), 51-60. Available at http://www.socioloskipregled.org.rs/2017/08/20/socioloski-pregled-1980/ [In Serbian]
Nechiporenko, O, Samsonov, V. (2016). Russian countryside: Stages of change, adaption to reforms and new global challenges. Sociološki pregled, 50(4), 511–526. doi:10.5937/socpreg1604511n
Opalić, P. (2008). Relationship between psychiatry and politics. Sociološki pregled, 42(3), 385–400. doi:10.5937/socpreg0803385o [In Serbian]
Petrović, J. (2014). Note on the so-called new French sociology and its methodological consequences - a review of the most important issues. U J. Petrović & D. Đođrević (eds), Research of social phenomena: Methodological considerations (pp 213–222). Niš: Filozofski fakultet Univerziteta u Nišu, Mašinski fakultet Univerziteta u Nišu. [In Serbian]
Petrović, M. (1972). Geopolitics of hunger and aid to underdeveloped countries. Sociološki pregled, 5(1-2), 97–125. Available at http://www.socioloskipregled.org.rs/2017/08/20/socioloski-pregled-1972/ [In Serbian]
Popić, S. (2012). The beginnings of Serbian sociological thought on globalization. Sociološki pregled,(Special Edition), 46(3–4), 1116–1133. Available at http://www.socioloskipregled.org.rs/2017/08/18/socioloski-pregled-god-xlvi-2012-sv-3-4/ [In Serbian]
Popić, S, Šuvaković, U. (2014). Academician Radomir D. Lukić - the forerunner of the study of globalization in Serbia. Teme, 38(1), 377–390. Available at http://teme2.junis.ni.ac.rs/public/journals/1/previousissues/teme1-2014/teme%201-2014-20.pdf [In Serbian]
Prošić, S. (2015). Globalisation vs. fragmentation of space. Sociološki pregled, 49(3), 313–324. doi:10.5937/socpreg1503313p [In Serbian]
Pušić, Lј. (2013). Environmental sociology as the broadest framework for a research of the globalizing social reality. Sociološki pregled, 47(2), 171–187. doi:10.5937/socpreg1302171p [In Serbian]
Ranković, M. (2002). Defining of word: Global hegemony. Sociološki pregled, 36(3–4), 323–376. doi:10.5937/socpreg0203323r [In Serbian]
Ranković, M. (2012). Evolution and involution of the new imperialism. Sociološki pregled, (Special Edition), 46(3-4), Available at http://www.socioloskipregled.org.rs/2017/08/18/socioloski-pregled-god-xlvi-2012-sv-3-4/ [In Serbian]
Skler, L. (2003). Competing conceptions of globalization. U V. Vuletić (ed), Globalization: Myth or reality (pp. 31–47). Beograd: Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva. [In Serbian]
Skot, A. (2003). Globalization: social process or political rhetoric. U V. Vuletić (ed), Globalization: Myth or reality (pp 31-47). Beograd: Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva [In Serbian]
Tadić, T. (2005). A contribution to (re)conceptualization and genesis of globalization. Privredna izgradnja, 48(3–4), 187–210. doi:10.2298/priz0504187t
Tadić, T. (2006). The globalization debate: The globalists. Panoeconomicus, 53(1), 51–63. doi:10.2298/pan0601051t
Tadić, T. (2006). The globalization debate: The skeptics. Panoeconomicus, 53(2), 179–190. doi:10.2298/PAN0602179T
Tripković, M. (2000). Globalization and Serbia. Sociološki pregled, 34(3-4), 61-74. doi:10.5937/socpreg0003061t [In Serbian]
Trkulja, J. (2012). Scientific-educational and public activity of Miroslav Pečujlić. Sociološki pregled, (Special Edition), 46(2), 445–484. Available at http://www.socioloskipregled.org.rs/2017/08/18/socioloski-pregled-god-xlvi-2012-sv-2/ [In Serbian]
Ćirić, J. (2000). Anti-humanism of the human rights ideology. Sociološki pregled, 34(1–2), 69–88. doi:10.5937/socpreg0001069c [In Serbian]
Čičkarić, L. (2003). Construction of political identity within the globalization and social transition. Sociološki pregled, 37(1–2), 79–99. doi:10.5937/socpreg0302079c [In Serbian]