Teorijski pristupi i pravci u istraživanju beskućništva: kritička analiza

  • Ana Lj. Bilinović Rajačić Univerzitet u Novom Sadu, Filozofski fakultet, Odsek za sociologiju, Novi Sad (Srbija)
  • Jovana M. Čikić Univerzitet u Novom Sadu, Filozofski fakultet, Odsek za sociologiju, Novi Sad (Srbija)
Ključne reči: beskućništvo, (sub)kultura beskućništva, „putevi beskućništva”, „životne priče”, teorijski pravci o beskućništvu

Sažetak


Beskućništvo se često objašnjava simplicistički i donekle ateorijski, kao stambeni problem ili kao problem socijalne pomoći izazvan strukturnim ili individualnim faktorima. Takva dualistička objašnjenja nisu adekvatna i bilo kakva politika prevencije i suzbijanja beskućništva doneta pod njihovim uticajem pokazala se kao neefikasna. U radu se analiziraju tri pristupa – „životne priče”, „putevi beskućništva” i (sub)kultura beskućništva – kao načini za unapređenje razumevanja sveukupnog iskustva beskućništva (njegovih uzroka, puteva kroz i iz beskućništva, kao i ishoda). Posebna pažnja posvećena je analizi aspekata pojedinih teorijskih pristupa i pravaca (feminizam, poststrukturalizam, postmodernizam i ekološki pravac) i ukazivanju na plodotvornost njihovih uvida pri analizi problematike beskućništva. Osnovu za izradu rada čini analiza radova relevantnih autora/predstavnika odabranih teorijskih pravaca i pristupa. Cilj rada je da se na osnovu odabranih radova pruži kritički osvrt na teorijska shvatanja o beskućništvu, kao i da se proširi razumevanje ovog društvenog fenomena.

Biografije autora

Ana Lj. Bilinović Rajačić, Univerzitet u Novom Sadu, Filozofski fakultet, Odsek za sociologiju, Novi Sad (Srbija)

Odsek za sociologiju, doc.dr

Jovana M. Čikić, Univerzitet u Novom Sadu, Filozofski fakultet, Odsek za sociologiju, Novi Sad (Srbija)

Odsek za sociologiju, vanredni profesor

Reference

Anderson, D. G, Rayens, M. K. (2004). Factors influencing homelessness in women. Public Health Nursing, 21(1), 12–23. doi.org/10.1111/j.1525–1446.2004.21103.x.

Anderson, I, Kemp, P.A, Quilgars, D. (1993). Single Homeless People. London: HMSO.

Baron, J. (2004). The ‘‘No Property’’ problem: Understanding poverty by understanding wealth. Michigan Law Review 102, 1000–1023. Available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=623821.

Bergamaschi, M, Castrignanò, M, De Rubertis, P. (2014). The Homeless and Public Space: Urban Policy and Exclusion in Bologna. Revue Interventions économiques, 51, 1–20. DOI: 10.4000/interventionseconomiques.2441.

Bretherton, J. (2017). Reconsidering Gender in Homelessness. European Journal of Homelessness, 11 (1), 1–22. Available at https://www.feantsaresearch.org/download/feantsa-ejh-11–1_a1-v045913941269604492255.pdf.

Christensen, R. C, Garces, L. K. (2006).Where is the research on homeless persons and suicide? Psychiatric Services, 5, 447. DOI: 10.1176/ps.2006.57.4.447.

Durkheim, E. (1982). The Rules of the Sociological Method. New York: Free Press.

Družić Ljubotina O, Knežević, M. (2012). Challenges in aproaching the problem of homelessness in Croatia. Socijalna misao, 19 (4), 75–90. Available at http://jugovic.fasper.bg.ac.rs/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/BESKUCNISTVO-Socijalna--misao-2012.pdf. [In Serbian]

Fitzpatrick, S. (2005). Explaining Homelessness: A Critical Realist Perspective. Housing, Theory and Society, 22 (1), 1–17. doi.org/10.1080/14036090510034563.

Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and Punishment. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

Greenberg, G. A, Rosenheck, R. A. (2008). Homelessness in the state and federal prison population. Criminal Behavior and Mental Health, 18, 88–103. doi.org/10.1002/cbm.685.

Jugović, A, Luković, M. (2012). Fenomenology of homelessness in contemporary society. Socijalna misao, 19 (4), 11–28. Availabe at http://jugovic.fasper.bg.ac.rs/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/BESKUCNISTVO-Socijalna-misao-2012.pdf [In Serbian]

Kostić M, Mihajlović, A. (2012). Homelessness – way of life or form of victimisation.Socijalna misao, 19 (4), 55–74. Available at http://jugovic.fasper.bg.ac.rs/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/BESKUCNISTVO-Socijalna-misao-2012.pdf [In Serbian]

Kuhn, R, Culhane, D. (1998). Applying cluster analysis to test a typology of homelessness by pattern of shelter utilization: Results from the analysis of administrative data. American Journal of Community Psychology, 26 (2), 207–232. doi. org/10.1023/A:1022176402357.

Kushel, M, Evans, J, Perry, S, Robertson, M, Moss, A. (2003). No door to lock: victimization among homeless and marginally housed persons. Archives of Internal Medicine, 163(20), 2492–2499. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.163.20.2492.

Langegger, S, Koester, S. (2016). Invisible homelessness: anonymity, exposure and the right to the city. Urban Geography, 37 (7), 1030–1048. doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2016.1147755.

Lefevr, A. (1977). Right to city. Marksizam u svetu, 4 (7), 163–175. [In Serbian]

Ljubičić, M. (2017). Who is the homeless? Stories from the shelter for adults and old in Belgrade. Kultura 157, 182—202. DOI 10.5937/kultura1757182L.

May, J. (2000). Housing Histories and Homeless Careers: A Biographical Approach. Housing Studies, 15 (4), 613–638. doi.org/10.1080/02673030050081131.

McNaughton Nicholls, C. (2010). Housing, Homelessness and Capabilities. Housing, Theory and Society, 27 (1), 23–41. doi.org/10.1080/14036090902764588.

Melnitzer, S. B. (2007). Marginalization and the Homeless: A Prescriptive Analysis. Journal of Social Distress and the Homeless, 16 (3), 193–220. doi.org/10.1179/sdh.2007.16.3.193.

Neale, J. (1997). Homelessness and theory reconsidered. Housing Studies, 12 (1), 47–61. doi.org/10.1080/02673039708720882.

Nooe, R. M, Patterson, D. A. (2010). The Ecology of Homelessness.Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 20 (2), 105–152. doi.org/10.1080/10911350903269757.

Pringle, R. & S. Watson (1992). Women’s interests and the post-structuralist state. In: M. Barrett and A. Phillips (Eds.). Destabilizing Theory: Contemporary Feminist Debates, 53–73. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Rafferty, Y, Shinn, M. (1991). The impact of homelessness on children. American Psychologist, 46 (11), 1170–1179. DOI: 10.1037//0003-066x.46.11.1170.

Ravenhill, M. (2008). The Culture of Homelessness. Aldershot: Ashgate.

Saunders, P, Williams, P. (1988). The constitution of the home: towards a research agenda. Housing Studies, 3(2), 81–93. doi.org/10.1080/02673038808720618.

Savage, M. (2016). Gendering Women’s Homelessness. Irish Journal of Applied Social Studies, 16 (2), 43–64. doi:10.21427/D7KB0X.

Somerville, P. (1992). Homelessness and the Meaning of Home: Rooflessness or Rootlessness? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 16 (4), 529–539.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468–2427.1992.tb00194.x.

Šikić – Mićanović, L. (2013). Using biographical research to understand experiences of crisis among homeless people in Croatia. Etnološka tribina, 36 (43), 99–109. Available at https://hrcak.srce.hr/111902.

Timotijević, M. (2012). Homelessness in transformation – contribution to integral comprehension of homelessness in Serbia. Socijalna misao, 19 (4), 41–54. Available at http://jugovic.fasper.bg.ac.rs/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/BESKUCNISTVO--Socijalna-misao-2012.pdf. [In Serbian]

Tomas, A, Dittmar, H. (1995). The Experience of Homeless Women: An Exploration of Housing Histories and the Meaning of Home. Housing Studies, 10 (4), 493–515. doi.org/10.1080/02673039508720834.

Wallace, S. E. (1968). The Road to Skid Row. Social Problems, 16 (1), 92–105. doi.org/10.2307/799529.

Žarković B, Petrović M, Timotijević, M. (2012). No house, no home: research results on homlessness in Serbia. Beograd: Hausing centar, Centar za unapređenje stanovanja socijalno ugroženih grupa. Available at https://www.housingcenter.org.rs/download/Istrazivanje-beskucnistva-u-Srbiji.pdf. [In Serbian]

Objavljeno
2020/03/31
Broj časopisa
Rubrika
Pregledni naučni rad