Theoretical approaches and directions in the research of homelessness: a critical analysis
Abstract
Homelessness is often explained simplistically and somewhat atheoretically, as a housing problem or as a social welfare issue caused by structural or individual factors. Such dualistic explanations are not quite adequate and policies of prevention and combating homelessness formed under their influence have proven to be inefficient. Thus, we have analyzed three approaches – life-story approach, homelessness pathways approach and the (sub)culture of homelessness – as means for improvement of understanding the overall experience of homelessness (its causes, paths through and from homelessness as well as outcomes). Special attention was given to the analysis of the aspects of selected theories (feminist, poststructuralist, postmodernist and ecological) and pointing to the fruitfulness of their insights while analyzing homelessness. This paper is based on the analysis of the works of the relevant authors/representatives of selected theoretical perspectives and approaches. The aim of this paper is to provide a critical review of the theoretical understanding of homelessness, as well to expand the understanding of this social phenomenon.
References
Anderson, D. G, Rayens, M. K. (2004). Factors influencing homelessness in women. Public Health Nursing, 21(1), 12–23. doi.org/10.1111/j.1525–1446.2004.21103.x.
Anderson, I, Kemp, P.A, Quilgars, D. (1993). Single Homeless People. London: HMSO.
Baron, J. (2004). The ‘‘No Property’’ problem: Understanding poverty by understanding wealth. Michigan Law Review 102, 1000–1023. Available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=623821.
Bergamaschi, M, Castrignanò, M, De Rubertis, P. (2014). The Homeless and Public Space: Urban Policy and Exclusion in Bologna. Revue Interventions économiques, 51, 1–20. DOI: 10.4000/interventionseconomiques.2441.
Bretherton, J. (2017). Reconsidering Gender in Homelessness. European Journal of Homelessness, 11 (1), 1–22. Available at https://www.feantsaresearch.org/download/feantsa-ejh-11–1_a1-v045913941269604492255.pdf.
Christensen, R. C, Garces, L. K. (2006).Where is the research on homeless persons and suicide? Psychiatric Services, 5, 447. DOI: 10.1176/ps.2006.57.4.447.
Durkheim, E. (1982). The Rules of the Sociological Method. New York: Free Press.
Družić Ljubotina O, Knežević, M. (2012). Challenges in aproaching the problem of homelessness in Croatia. Socijalna misao, 19 (4), 75–90. Available at http://jugovic.fasper.bg.ac.rs/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/BESKUCNISTVO-Socijalna--misao-2012.pdf. [In Serbian]
Fitzpatrick, S. (2005). Explaining Homelessness: A Critical Realist Perspective. Housing, Theory and Society, 22 (1), 1–17. doi.org/10.1080/14036090510034563.
Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and Punishment. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Greenberg, G. A, Rosenheck, R. A. (2008). Homelessness in the state and federal prison population. Criminal Behavior and Mental Health, 18, 88–103. doi.org/10.1002/cbm.685.
Jugović, A, Luković, M. (2012). Fenomenology of homelessness in contemporary society. Socijalna misao, 19 (4), 11–28. Availabe at http://jugovic.fasper.bg.ac.rs/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/BESKUCNISTVO-Socijalna-misao-2012.pdf [In Serbian]
Kostić M, Mihajlović, A. (2012). Homelessness – way of life or form of victimisation.Socijalna misao, 19 (4), 55–74. Available at http://jugovic.fasper.bg.ac.rs/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/BESKUCNISTVO-Socijalna-misao-2012.pdf [In Serbian]
Kuhn, R, Culhane, D. (1998). Applying cluster analysis to test a typology of homelessness by pattern of shelter utilization: Results from the analysis of administrative data. American Journal of Community Psychology, 26 (2), 207–232. doi. org/10.1023/A:1022176402357.
Kushel, M, Evans, J, Perry, S, Robertson, M, Moss, A. (2003). No door to lock: victimization among homeless and marginally housed persons. Archives of Internal Medicine, 163(20), 2492–2499. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.163.20.2492.
Langegger, S, Koester, S. (2016). Invisible homelessness: anonymity, exposure and the right to the city. Urban Geography, 37 (7), 1030–1048. doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2016.1147755.
Lefevr, A. (1977). Right to city. Marksizam u svetu, 4 (7), 163–175. [In Serbian]
Ljubičić, M. (2017). Who is the homeless? Stories from the shelter for adults and old in Belgrade. Kultura 157, 182—202. DOI 10.5937/kultura1757182L.
May, J. (2000). Housing Histories and Homeless Careers: A Biographical Approach. Housing Studies, 15 (4), 613–638. doi.org/10.1080/02673030050081131.
McNaughton Nicholls, C. (2010). Housing, Homelessness and Capabilities. Housing, Theory and Society, 27 (1), 23–41. doi.org/10.1080/14036090902764588.
Melnitzer, S. B. (2007). Marginalization and the Homeless: A Prescriptive Analysis. Journal of Social Distress and the Homeless, 16 (3), 193–220. doi.org/10.1179/sdh.2007.16.3.193.
Neale, J. (1997). Homelessness and theory reconsidered. Housing Studies, 12 (1), 47–61. doi.org/10.1080/02673039708720882.
Nooe, R. M, Patterson, D. A. (2010). The Ecology of Homelessness.Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 20 (2), 105–152. doi.org/10.1080/10911350903269757.
Pringle, R. & S. Watson (1992). Women’s interests and the post-structuralist state. In: M. Barrett and A. Phillips (Eds.). Destabilizing Theory: Contemporary Feminist Debates, 53–73. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Rafferty, Y, Shinn, M. (1991). The impact of homelessness on children. American Psychologist, 46 (11), 1170–1179. DOI: 10.1037//0003-066x.46.11.1170.
Ravenhill, M. (2008). The Culture of Homelessness. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Saunders, P, Williams, P. (1988). The constitution of the home: towards a research agenda. Housing Studies, 3(2), 81–93. doi.org/10.1080/02673038808720618.
Savage, M. (2016). Gendering Women’s Homelessness. Irish Journal of Applied Social Studies, 16 (2), 43–64. doi:10.21427/D7KB0X.
Somerville, P. (1992). Homelessness and the Meaning of Home: Rooflessness or Rootlessness? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 16 (4), 529–539.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468–2427.1992.tb00194.x.
Šikić – Mićanović, L. (2013). Using biographical research to understand experiences of crisis among homeless people in Croatia. Etnološka tribina, 36 (43), 99–109. Available at https://hrcak.srce.hr/111902.
Timotijević, M. (2012). Homelessness in transformation – contribution to integral comprehension of homelessness in Serbia. Socijalna misao, 19 (4), 41–54. Available at http://jugovic.fasper.bg.ac.rs/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/BESKUCNISTVO--Socijalna-misao-2012.pdf. [In Serbian]
Tomas, A, Dittmar, H. (1995). The Experience of Homeless Women: An Exploration of Housing Histories and the Meaning of Home. Housing Studies, 10 (4), 493–515. doi.org/10.1080/02673039508720834.
Wallace, S. E. (1968). The Road to Skid Row. Social Problems, 16 (1), 92–105. doi.org/10.2307/799529.
Žarković B, Petrović M, Timotijević, M. (2012). No house, no home: research results on homlessness in Serbia. Beograd: Hausing centar, Centar za unapređenje stanovanja socijalno ugroženih grupa. Available at https://www.housingcenter.org.rs/download/Istrazivanje-beskucnistva-u-Srbiji.pdf. [In Serbian]