Politički marketing i strategije digitalnih iluzija – primeri iz Venecuele i Brazila

  • Maja S. Pavlović Univerzitet u Beogradu, Fakultet političkih nauka, Beograd (Srbija)
  • Ljubiša M. Bojić Univerzitet u Beogradu, Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, Beograd (Srbija)
Ključne reči: politički marketing, javno mnjenje, iluzije, astroturfing, dezinformacije, Brazil, Venecuela

Sažetak


Država predstavlja fenomen koji stalno menja svoju formu, kao i politički akteri unutar nje. Pravac tih promena u određenoj meri zavisi od razvoja tehnologije. Nove informaciono-komunikacione tehnologije i uspon društvenih mreža uticali su na modernu političku komunikaciju. Ovaj rad razmatra na koji način se eksploatišu digitalni alati u nepredvidljivom društvenom ambijentu kojeg odlikuju brojne političke krize. Posebnu pažnju posvetili smo fenomenu digitalnog astroturfinga i širenja političkih dezinformacija u Venecueli i Brazilu. Brzi tehnološki razvoj u kombinaciji sa korišćenjem političkih botova stvara potencijal za širenje lažnih vesti, što utiče na demokratičnost izbornog procesa. Stoga je neophodno podrobnije istražiti ove fenomene.

Reference

Alexander, J., & Smith, J. (2010). Disinformation: A taxonomy. IEEE Security & Privacy, 9(1), 58–63.

Bayer, J., Bitiukova, N., Bard, P., Szakács, J., Alemanno, A., & Uszkiewicz, E. (2019). Disinformation and propaganda–impact on the functioning of the rule of law in the EU and its Member States. HEC Paris Research Paper No. LAW-2019-1341.

Bittman, L. (1981). Soviet Bloc ‘Disinformation’ and other ‘Active Measures’. In Pfaltzgraff, R, L., Ra’anan, U., Milberg, W. (eds., 2019). Intelligence Policy and National Security (212–228). London: Palgrave Macmillan

Deseriis, M. (2017). Direct Parliamentarianism: An Analysis of the Political Values Embedded in Rousseau, the” Operating System” of the Five STAR Movement In 2017 Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government (CeDEM) (pp. 15–25). IEEE.

Edelman (2019). 2019 Edelman Trust Barometеr: Global Report. Edelman. https://www.edelman.com/sites/g/files/aatuss191/files/2019-02/2019_Edelman_Trust_Barometer_Global_Report.pdf

Forelle, M., Howard, P., Monroy-Hernández, A., & Savage, S. (2015). Political bots and the manipulation of public opinion in Venezuela. arXiv preprint arXiv:1507.07109.

Hellmann, O. (2017). Populism in East Asia. In Kaltwasser, C. R., Taggart, P., Espejo, P. O., Ostiguy, P. (eds., 2017) The Oxford Handbook of Populism (161–178). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hernon, P. (1995). Disinformation and misinformation through the internet: Findings of an exploratory study. Government information quarterly, 12(2), 133–139.

Kiousis, S. (2002). Interactivity: a concept explication. New media & society, 4(3), 355–383.

Kos-Stanišić, L. (2004). Venezuela – Democracy or Semi-Democracy? Politička misao: časopis za politologiju, 41(4), 92–112 [In Croatian]

Krstić, Z. (2014). Latin America: Challenges and Obstacles to Democratization. Beograd: Fakultet političkih nauka [In Serbian]

Lanoszka, A. (2019). Disinformation in international politics. European Journal of International Security, 4(2), 227–248.

Lukić, R. (1981). Political parties. Beograd: Naučna knjiga. [In Serbian]

Lee, C. W. (2010). The roots of astroturfing. Contexts, 9(1), 73–75.

Moffitt, B. (2014). Contemporary Populism and “The People” in the Asia-Pacific Region. In C. de la Torre (ed.) The Promise and Perils of Populism: Global Perspectives (293–316). Lexington (KY): University Press of Kentucky

Morales, J. S. (2020). Perceived Popularity and Online Political Dissent: Evidence from Twitter in Venezuela. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 25(1), 5–27.

Mudde, C. (2007). Populist radical right parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mudde, C., & Kaltwasser, C. R. (2013). Exclusionary vs. inclusionary populism: Comparing contemporary Europe and Latin America. Government and Opposition, 48(2), 147–174.

Orlović, S. (2008). Political life of Serbia: between partocracy and democracy. Beograd: Službeni glasnik. [In Serbian]

Poster, M. (1997). Cyberdemocracy: Internet and the public sphere. Internet culture, 201, 218.

Rooduijn, M., & Akkerman, T. (2017). Flank attacks: Populism and left-right radicalism in Western Europe. Party Politics, 23(3), 193–204.

Ruediger, M. A., Grassi, A., Guedes, A. L., Borghi, J., Silva, L. R. D., & Carvalho, D. (2018). Bots, social networks and politics in Brazil. Rio de Janeiro: FGV DAPP

Repeating Islands, (2011, September 21). Venezuela gives free laptops to school children. Repeating Islands. https://repeatingislands.com/2011/09/21/venezuela-gives-free-laptops-to-school-children/

Sader, E. (2008). The weakest link? Neoliberalism in Latin America. New Left Review, (52), 5.

Smiljković, R. (2013). Serbs in imperial clashes. Beograd: Službeni glasnik. [In Serbian]

Stanard, M. G. (2011). Selling the Congo: A history of European pro-empire propaganda and the making of Belgian imperialism. University of Nebraska Press

van Dijk, T. A. (2017). How globo media manipulated the impeachment of Brazilian president Dilma Rousseff. Discourse & Communication, 11(2), 199–229.

Wodak, R., & Krzyżanowski, M. (2017). Right-wing populism in Europe & USA: Contesting politics & discourse beyond ‘Orbanism’ and ‘Trumpism’. Journal of Language and Politics, 16(4), 471–484.

Woolley, S. C. (2016). Automating power: Social bot interference in global politics. First Monday, 21(4). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v21i4.6161

Objavljeno
2021/01/14
Broj časopisa
Rubrika
Pregledni naučni rad