Political marketing and strategies of digital illusions – examples from Venezuela and Brazil
Abstract
State represents a social phenomenon which is constantly changing – just like all political actors. The direction of that evolution is determined by the development and current state of the art in technological domain. That explains how the rise of social media and new ICTs has shaped the contemporary political communication. This paper sheds light on the manner in which digital tools are exploited in an unpredictable social ambience which is characterized by numerous political crises. Special attention has been given to the phenomenon of digital astroturfing and political disinformation trends in Venezuela and Brazil. We have found that the dynamic technological development combined with the use of political bots has been creating the potential for fake news, thus impacting election processes and endangering democracy. Therefore, these phenomena need further scientific examination.
References
Alexander, J., & Smith, J. (2010). Disinformation: A taxonomy. IEEE Security & Privacy, 9(1), 58–63.
Bayer, J., Bitiukova, N., Bard, P., Szakács, J., Alemanno, A., & Uszkiewicz, E. (2019). Disinformation and propaganda–impact on the functioning of the rule of law in the EU and its Member States. HEC Paris Research Paper No. LAW-2019-1341.
Bittman, L. (1981). Soviet Bloc ‘Disinformation’ and other ‘Active Measures’. In Pfaltzgraff, R, L., Ra’anan, U., Milberg, W. (eds., 2019). Intelligence Policy and National Security (212–228). London: Palgrave Macmillan
Deseriis, M. (2017). Direct Parliamentarianism: An Analysis of the Political Values Embedded in Rousseau, the” Operating System” of the Five STAR Movement In 2017 Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government (CeDEM) (pp. 15–25). IEEE.
Edelman (2019). 2019 Edelman Trust Barometеr: Global Report. Edelman. https://www.edelman.com/sites/g/files/aatuss191/files/2019-02/2019_Edelman_Trust_Barometer_Global_Report.pdf
Forelle, M., Howard, P., Monroy-Hernández, A., & Savage, S. (2015). Political bots and the manipulation of public opinion in Venezuela. arXiv preprint arXiv:1507.07109.
Hellmann, O. (2017). Populism in East Asia. In Kaltwasser, C. R., Taggart, P., Espejo, P. O., Ostiguy, P. (eds., 2017) The Oxford Handbook of Populism (161–178). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hernon, P. (1995). Disinformation and misinformation through the internet: Findings of an exploratory study. Government information quarterly, 12(2), 133–139.
Kiousis, S. (2002). Interactivity: a concept explication. New media & society, 4(3), 355–383.
Kos-Stanišić, L. (2004). Venezuela – Democracy or Semi-Democracy? Politička misao: časopis za politologiju, 41(4), 92–112 [In Croatian]
Krstić, Z. (2014). Latin America: Challenges and Obstacles to Democratization. Beograd: Fakultet političkih nauka [In Serbian]
Lanoszka, A. (2019). Disinformation in international politics. European Journal of International Security, 4(2), 227–248.
Lukić, R. (1981). Political parties. Beograd: Naučna knjiga. [In Serbian]
Lee, C. W. (2010). The roots of astroturfing. Contexts, 9(1), 73–75.
Moffitt, B. (2014). Contemporary Populism and “The People” in the Asia-Pacific Region. In C. de la Torre (ed.) The Promise and Perils of Populism: Global Perspectives (293–316). Lexington (KY): University Press of Kentucky
Morales, J. S. (2020). Perceived Popularity and Online Political Dissent: Evidence from Twitter in Venezuela. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 25(1), 5–27.
Mudde, C. (2007). Populist radical right parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mudde, C., & Kaltwasser, C. R. (2013). Exclusionary vs. inclusionary populism: Comparing contemporary Europe and Latin America. Government and Opposition, 48(2), 147–174.
Orlović, S. (2008). Political life of Serbia: between partocracy and democracy. Beograd: Službeni glasnik. [In Serbian]
Poster, M. (1997). Cyberdemocracy: Internet and the public sphere. Internet culture, 201, 218.
Rooduijn, M., & Akkerman, T. (2017). Flank attacks: Populism and left-right radicalism in Western Europe. Party Politics, 23(3), 193–204.
Ruediger, M. A., Grassi, A., Guedes, A. L., Borghi, J., Silva, L. R. D., & Carvalho, D. (2018). Bots, social networks and politics in Brazil. Rio de Janeiro: FGV DAPP
Repeating Islands, (2011, September 21). Venezuela gives free laptops to school children. Repeating Islands. https://repeatingislands.com/2011/09/21/venezuela-gives-free-laptops-to-school-children/
Sader, E. (2008). The weakest link? Neoliberalism in Latin America. New Left Review, (52), 5.
Smiljković, R. (2013). Serbs in imperial clashes. Beograd: Službeni glasnik. [In Serbian]
Stanard, M. G. (2011). Selling the Congo: A history of European pro-empire propaganda and the making of Belgian imperialism. University of Nebraska Press
van Dijk, T. A. (2017). How globo media manipulated the impeachment of Brazilian president Dilma Rousseff. Discourse & Communication, 11(2), 199–229.
Wodak, R., & Krzyżanowski, M. (2017). Right-wing populism in Europe & USA: Contesting politics & discourse beyond ‘Orbanism’ and ‘Trumpism’. Journal of Language and Politics, 16(4), 471–484.
Woolley, S. C. (2016). Automating power: Social bot interference in global politics. First Monday, 21(4). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v21i4.6161