Metanovinarski diskurs o slobodi medija u onlajn medijima u Srbiji

  • Marta S. Mitrović Univerzitet u Nišu, Filozofski fakultet, Departman za komunikologiju i novinarstvo, Niš (Srbija)
  • Marija Z. Vujović Univerzitet u Nišu, Filozofski fakultet, Departman za komunikologiju i novinarstvo, Niš (Srbija)
  • Tatjana M. Vulić Univerzitet u Nišu, Filozofski fakultet, Departman za komunikologiju i novinarstvo, Niš (Srbija)
Ključne reči: metanovinarski diskurs, sloboda medija, tekstualna analiza, novinarstvo

Sažetak


Metanovinarski diskrus je široko istraživačko polje, čijom se analizom dobija uvid u načine na koje se definišu i legitimišu različiti novinarski koncepti u okviru same profesije. Međutim, pored novinarskih aktera u izgradnji metadiskursa u novinarstvu učestvuju i brojni vanmedijski akteri. U radu je analiziran metanovinarski diskurs (Carlson, 2016) o slobodi medija, sa ciljem da se odgovori na postavljena istraživačka pitanja: „Koji akteri grade metadiskurs oko koncepta slobode medija u Srbiji?“ i „Kakav je ton tog metadiskursa?“. Analizirana su 674 teksta prikupljena tokom 2021. i 2022. godine iz 10 onlajn medija. Rezultati analize pokazali su da metadiskurs o slobodi medija većinski grade nenovinarski akteri, dok je najčešći ton tog diskursa kritički. Ukrštanjem aktera sa tonom diskursa zaključeno je da kritički ton preovlađuje kod svih aktera, novinarskih i nenovinarskih, osim kod državnih zvaničnika. Oni su ujedno i jedini akteri čiji su iskazi analizirani, a kod kojih preovlađuje pozitivan ton diskursa.

Reference

Benson, R. (2004). Bringing the sociology of media back. Political Communication, 21 (3), 275–292. doi: 10.1080/10584600490481299.

Blumler, J., Gurevitch, M. (2002). The crisis of public communication. Routledge.

Bourdieu, P. (2005). The political field, the social science field, and the journalistic field. In: R. Benson & E. Neveu (еds.). Bourdieu and the journalistic field (29–47). Malden, MA: Polity.

Carlson, M. (2016). Metajournalistic discourse and the meanings of journalism: Definitional control, boundary work, and legitimation. Communication theory, 26 (4), 349–368.

Christians, C. G., Glasser, T., McQuail, D., Nordenstreng, K., White, R. A. (2010). Normative theories of the media: Journalism in democratic societies. University of Illinois Press.

Coffey, A., Atkinson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data: Complementary research strategies. Sage Publications, Inc.

Ferrucci, P., Nelson, J. L., Davis, M. P. (2020). From “Public Journalism” to “Engaged Journalism”: Imagined Audiences and Denigrating Discourse. International Journal of Communication, 14, 1586–1604. https://doi.org/1932–8036/20200005.

Hallin, D. C., Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics. Cambridge University Press.

Hallin, D. C., Mancini, P. (еds.). (2011). Comparing media systems beyond the Western world. Cambridge University Press.

Hamada, B. (1994). The relationship between journalists and politicians in the Arab World. Journal of Aalam Al-Fikr, 26, 66–100.

Hanitzsch, T. (2009). Comparative Journalism Studies. In: K. Wahl-Jorgensen & T. Hanitzsch (еds.). The Handbook of Journalism Studies (pp. 413–427). Routledge.

Hanitzsch, T., Anikina, M., Berganza, R., Cangoz, I., Coman, M., Hamada, B. ... Yuen, K. W. (2010). Modeling perceived influences on journalism: Evidence from a cross-national survey of journalists. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 87 (1), 5–22.

Kleinsteuber, H. J., Thomass, B. (2010). Comparing media systems: the European dimension. CM-časopis za upravljanje komuniciranjem, 5 (16), 5–20. [In Serbian]

Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage publications.

McKee, A. (2001). A beginner’s guide to textual analysis. Metro Magazine: Media & Education Magazine (127/128), 138–149.

McQuail, D. (2000) McQuail’s Mass Communication Theory. London: Sage

Milojević, A., Krstić, A. (2018). Hierarchy of influences on transitional journalism– Corrupting relationships between political, economic and media elites. European Journal of Communication, 33 (1), 37–56.

Reese, D. S., Shoemaker, J. P. (2016) A Media Sociology for the Networked Public Sphere: The Hierarchy of Influences Model, Mass Communication and Society, 19:4, 389–410, DOI: 10.1080/15205436.2016.1174268.

Ryfe, D. (2006). Guest editor’s introduction: New institutionalism and the news. Political Communication, 23, 135–144.

Siebert, F., Peterson, T., Schramm, W. (1956). Four theories of the press: The authoritarian, libertarian, social responsibility, and Soviet communist concepts of what the press should be and do. (Vol. 10). University of Illinois Press.

Tomić, B. (2007). The extent of privatisation of the mass media in Serbia. CM Komunikacija i mediji, 2 (5), 55–76. [In Serbian]

Vos, T. P., Singer, J. B. (2016). Media Discourse about Entrepreneurial Journalism: Implications for Journalistic Capital. Journalism Practice, 10 (2), 143–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2015.1124730.

White, M. D., Marsh, E. E. (2006). Content analysis: A flexible methodology. Library trends, 55 (1), 22–45.

Objavljeno
2024/02/11
Broj časopisa
Rubrika
Originalni naučni rad