Metajournalistic discourse on media freedom in online media in Serbia
Abstract
Metajournalistic discourse is a broad field of research, and its analysis provides insight into how different journalistic concepts are defined and legitimised within the profession. However, in addition to journalistic actors, numerous non-media actors also participate in the construction of metadiscourse in journalism. This paper analyses metajournalistic discourse (Carlson, 2016) on media freedom, with the aim of answering the following research questions: “Which actors build metadiscourse around the concept of media freedom in Serbia?” and “What is the tone of this metadiscourse?” As many as 674 texts collected during 2021 and 2022 from 10 online media outlets were analysed. The results of this analysis show that the metadiscourse on media freedom is mostly built by non-journalistic actors, while the most common tone of that discourse is critical. By cross-referencing the actors with the tone of discourse, it was concluded that a critical tone prevailed among all actors, both journalists and non-journalists, with the exception of state officials. They are also the only actors with a positive tone of discourse.
References
Benson, R. (2004). Bringing the sociology of media back. Political Communication, 21 (3), 275–292. doi: 10.1080/10584600490481299.
Blumler, J., Gurevitch, M. (2002). The crisis of public communication. Routledge.
Bourdieu, P. (2005). The political field, the social science field, and the journalistic field. In: R. Benson & E. Neveu (еds.). Bourdieu and the journalistic field (29–47). Malden, MA: Polity.
Carlson, M. (2016). Metajournalistic discourse and the meanings of journalism: Definitional control, boundary work, and legitimation. Communication theory, 26 (4), 349–368.
Christians, C. G., Glasser, T., McQuail, D., Nordenstreng, K., White, R. A. (2010). Normative theories of the media: Journalism in democratic societies. University of Illinois Press.
Coffey, A., Atkinson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data: Complementary research strategies. Sage Publications, Inc.
Ferrucci, P., Nelson, J. L., Davis, M. P. (2020). From “Public Journalism” to “Engaged Journalism”: Imagined Audiences and Denigrating Discourse. International Journal of Communication, 14, 1586–1604. https://doi.org/1932–8036/20200005.
Hallin, D. C., Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics. Cambridge University Press.
Hallin, D. C., Mancini, P. (еds.). (2011). Comparing media systems beyond the Western world. Cambridge University Press.
Hamada, B. (1994). The relationship between journalists and politicians in the Arab World. Journal of Aalam Al-Fikr, 26, 66–100.
Hanitzsch, T. (2009). Comparative Journalism Studies. In: K. Wahl-Jorgensen & T. Hanitzsch (еds.). The Handbook of Journalism Studies (pp. 413–427). Routledge.
Hanitzsch, T., Anikina, M., Berganza, R., Cangoz, I., Coman, M., Hamada, B. ... Yuen, K. W. (2010). Modeling perceived influences on journalism: Evidence from a cross-national survey of journalists. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 87 (1), 5–22.
Kleinsteuber, H. J., Thomass, B. (2010). Comparing media systems: the European dimension. CM-časopis za upravljanje komuniciranjem, 5 (16), 5–20. [In Serbian]
Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage publications.
McKee, A. (2001). A beginner’s guide to textual analysis. Metro Magazine: Media & Education Magazine (127/128), 138–149.
McQuail, D. (2000) McQuail’s Mass Communication Theory. London: Sage
Milojević, A., Krstić, A. (2018). Hierarchy of influences on transitional journalism– Corrupting relationships between political, economic and media elites. European Journal of Communication, 33 (1), 37–56.
Reese, D. S., Shoemaker, J. P. (2016) A Media Sociology for the Networked Public Sphere: The Hierarchy of Influences Model, Mass Communication and Society, 19:4, 389–410, DOI: 10.1080/15205436.2016.1174268.
Ryfe, D. (2006). Guest editor’s introduction: New institutionalism and the news. Political Communication, 23, 135–144.
Siebert, F., Peterson, T., Schramm, W. (1956). Four theories of the press: The authoritarian, libertarian, social responsibility, and Soviet communist concepts of what the press should be and do. (Vol. 10). University of Illinois Press.
Tomić, B. (2007). The extent of privatisation of the mass media in Serbia. CM Komunikacija i mediji, 2 (5), 55–76. [In Serbian]
Vos, T. P., Singer, J. B. (2016). Media Discourse about Entrepreneurial Journalism: Implications for Journalistic Capital. Journalism Practice, 10 (2), 143–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2015.1124730.
White, M. D., Marsh, E. E. (2006). Content analysis: A flexible methodology. Library trends, 55 (1), 22–45.