Genealogija civilnog društva: savremena reinterpretacija koncepta
Sažetak
Polazeći od izuzetne važnosti civilnog društva za političku/demokratsku teoriju, u ovom radu kritički se analizira status koncepta u različitim teoretskim diskursima pokušavajući da se detektuju najaktuelnije promene u njegovom razumevanju. Propituju se premoderne, moderne i postmoderne paradigme civilnog društva. Najvažniji nalazi su da njegovo tumačenje obuhvata: (1) kulturalnu procesualnost i raznolikost nasuprot apstraktnoj i represivnoj datosti zapadne matrice; (2) činjenicu da spolja kontrolisane neizvorne NVO neoliberalnog civilnog društva imaju slabu podršku građana i nizak stepen odgovornosti; (3) dijalog sa neotradicionalnim asocijacijama; i (4) ideju da civilno društvo ne može biti utopijski oslobođeno redistribucije moći što podrazumeva njegovu politizaciju, hijerarhizaciju i elite civilnog društva.
Reference
Allen, Ch. (1997). Who Needs Civil Society? Review of African Political Economy, 24 (73), 329–337. doi.org/10.1080/03056249708704266
Brusseau, J. (2020). Deleuze’s Postscript on the Societies of Control: Updated for Big Data and Predictive Analytics. Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory, 67 (164), 1–25.
Chatterjee, P. (2001). On civil and political society in post-colonial democracies. In: Civil Society: History and Possibilities (eds. Sudipta Kaviraj and Sunil Khilnani), 165–179, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cohen, J., Arato, A. (1997). Civil Society and Political Theory.. Cambridge: MIT.
Chambers, S., Kopstein, J. (2006). Civil Society and the State. In: The Oxford Handbook of Political Theory by John S. Dryzek, Bonnie Honig and Anne Phillips (eds.), 363–382, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chandhoke, N. (1995). State and Civil Society: Explorations in Political Theory.. New Delhi: Sage.
Dean, M., Villadsen, K. (2016). State Phobia and Civil Society: The Political Legacy of Michel Foucault. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Deleuze, G. (1992). Postscript on the Societies of Control. October, 59, 3–7.
Ehrenberg, J. (2017). Civil Society: The Critical History of an Idea.. New York: New York University Press.
Ferguson, A. [1767] (1966). An Essay on the History of Civil Society.. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Foucault, M. (2008). The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the College de France, 1978–1979. London: Palgrave.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2012). Habermas and Foucault: Thinkers for Civil Society? In: Power and Politics (eds. Mark Haugaard and Stewart R Clegg), 117–141, New York: Sage.
Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the Prison Notebooks. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
Gellner, E. (1994). Conditions of Liberty: Civil Society and its Rivals.. London: Hamish Hamilton.
Habermas, J. (1987). The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity.. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Habermas, J. (1996). Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy.. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Hann, C., Dunn, E. (eds.). (1996). Civil society: Challenging Western Models.. London: Routledge.
Hardt, M. (1995). The Withering of Civil Society. Social Text, 45 (4), 27–44. doi. org/10.2307/466673
Hardt, M. and Negri, A. 2000. Empire. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Hegel, G. W. F. [1821] (1991). Elements of the Philosophy of Right.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hirst, P. (1994). Associative Democracy: New Forms of Economic and Social Governance.. Amherst: University of Massachusetts.
Hunter, A. and Milofsky, C. (2007). Pragmatic Liberalism: Constructing a Civil Society.. New York: Palgrave.
Kaldor, M. (2003). Civil Society and Accountability. Journal of Human Development, 4 (1), 5–27, doi.org/10.1080/1464988032000051469
Kant, I. [1795] (1936). Perpetual Peace.. New York: Columbia University Press.
Kaviraj, S. and Khilnani, S. (eds.) (2001). Civil Society: History and Possibilities.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kleinhans, K. A. (2018). Good government and the vocation of citizenship: A Lutheran perspective. Dialoge, 57 (2), 120–125, doi.org/10.1111/dial.12392
Konrad, G. (1984). Anti-Politics. London: Quartet Books.
Kothari, R. (1989). Politics and the People: In Search of a Humane India. New York: New Horizons Press.
Locke, J. [1689] (1991). Two Treatises of Government and A Letter Concerning Toleration. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Migdal, J. (2001). State in Society: Studying How States and Societies Transform and Constitute One Another. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McClelland, J. S. (2005). A History of Western Political Thought.. New York: Routledge.
Mohan, G. (2002). The Disappointments of Civil Society: The Politics of NGO interven-tion in Northern Ghana. Political Geography, 21 (1), 2–29. doi.org/10.1016/S0962-6298(01)00072-5
Müller, K. B. (2006). The Civil Society–State Relationship in Contemporary Discourse: A Complementary Account from Giddens’ Perspective. British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 8 (2), 311–330, doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856x.2006.00212.x
Pietrzyk-Reeves, D. (2022). Rethinking Theoretical Approaches to Civil Society in Central and Eastern Europe: Toward a Dynamic Approach. East European Politics and Societies and Cultures, 36 (4), 1335–1354.
Post, R. C., Rosenblum, N. L. (2002). Introduction. In: Civil Society and Government (eds.). N. L. Rosenblum and R. C. Post, 1–26. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Rahner, H. (1992). Church and State in Early Christianity. San Francisco: Ignatius Press.
Rose, N. (1999). Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rousseau, J.-J. [1762] (1993). The Social Contract. Beograd: Filip Višnjić. [In Serbian]
Schecter, D. (2000). Sovereign States or Political Communities? Civil Society and Contemporary Politics.. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Starobinski, J. (1988). Jean-Jacques Rousseau: Transparency and Obstruction.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Stojanović, Đ. (2009). Associative Democracy: Problems and Perspectives.. Beograd: Krug. [In Serbian]
Tocqueville, A. [1835, 1840] (1990). Democracy in America 1–2.. New York: Vintage Books. Tönnies, F. (2001). Community and Civil Society.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Villadsen, K. (2016). Michel Foucault and the Forces of Civil Society. Theory, Culture & Society, 33 (3), 3–26.