Bezbednost i privatnost u pametnim gradovima

Ненад Путник; Jana Marković

doi:10.5937/socpreg59-56735

Nenad R. Putnik Univerzitet u Beogradu, Fakultet bezbednosti, Beograd (Srbija) https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6374-7270
Jana M. Marković Univerzitet u Beogradu, Fakultet bezbednosti, Beograd (Srbija) https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0676-8213

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/socpreg59-56735

Ključne reči: pametan grad, informaciono-komunikacione tehnologije, bezbednost, privatnost, podaci o ličnosti

Sažetak

Globalni trend rastuće urbanizacije i ekspanzije gradova poslednjih decenija prouzrokovao je brojne probleme u njihovom funkcionisanju. Ubrzan razvoj informaciono-komunikacionih tehnologija pojavio se kao rešenje za te probleme, i doveo do nastanka takozvanih pametnih gradova. Pametni grad osmišljen je kao nov model grada koji generiše i obrađuje enormne količine digitalnih podataka sa ciljem optimizacije gradske infrastrukture i poboljšanja uslova života. Upotreba novih tehnologija je, međutim, otvorila mnoga pitanja i izazvala zabrinutost u vezi sa načinom upotrebe tih tehnologija i mogućnostima zloupotrebe prikupljenih podataka. U radu su opisane ključne karakteristike arhitekture pametnog grada i analizirana pitanja ugrožavanja bezbednosti i privatnosti građana koja ona otvara. Izvori i oblici ugrožavanja bezbednosti i privatnosti u pametnim gradovima su brojni, međusobno isprepleteni i zahtevaju podrobnu analizu sa tehničko-tehnološkog, sociološkog i pravnog aspekta.

Reference

Ahmed, S. (2020). Security and Privacy in Smart Cities: Challenges and Opportunities International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology, 68 (2), 1-8. DOI: 10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V68I2P201.

Al-Turjman, F, Zahmatkesh, H., Shahroze, R. (2019). An overview of security and privacy in smart cities’ IoT communications. Trans Emerging Tel Tech, e3677. DOI: 10.1002/ett.3677.

Bergstrom, A. (2015). Online privacy concerns: A broad approach to understanding the concerns of different groups for different uses. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 419-426. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.025.

Buzan, B. (1983). People, states, and fear: the national security problem in international relations. Wheatsheaf Books.

Budak, J., Rajh, E., Recher, V. (2017). Citizens’ privacy concerns: does national culture matter?. In: M. Friedewald et al. (eds.). Surveillance, Privacy and Security, 36-51. Routledge.

Cecco, L. (2019, June 6). ‘Surveillance capitalism’: critic urges Toronto to abandon smart city project. The Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2019/jun/06/toronto-smart-city-google-project-privacy-concerns.

Dameri, R. P. (2013). Searching for smart city definition: a comprehensive proposal. International Journal of computers & technology, 11 (5), 2544-2551.

DataGenetics. (n. d.). PIN analysis. Available at: http://www.datagenetics.com/blog/september32012/.

Danilović Hristić, N. (2016). Languish After Safety in the Urban Life. In: Conference Proceedings, Fourth Internation Conference and Exhibition, On Architecture: Scale of Design - From Micro to Macro, STRAND, 14, 43-51.

Danilović Hristić, N., Stefanović, N., Putnik, N. (2021). The Real Effects of The Use of Security Cameras in Public Urban Spaces and Controversies Related to Privacy Protection. In: A. Gul, O. Demirel & S. Seydo§oglu (eds.). The ProceedingBook - 1st International Architectural Sciences and Applications Symposium, 1296-1303. ISPEC Publishing House.

Emami-Naeini, P., Breda, J., Dai, W., Kohno, T., Laine, K., Patel, S., Roesner, F. (2023). Understanding People’s Concerns and Attitudes Toward Smart Cities. In: A. Schmidt et al., (eds.). Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ‘23) (Article No.: 71, 1-24). New York: Association for Computing Machinery. DOI: 10.1145/3544548.3581558.

Evans, L. (2018). The privacy parenthesis: Private and public spheres, smart cities and big data. Creatingsmart cities, 194-204. DOI: 10.4324/9781351182409.

Finn, R. L., Wright, D., Friedewald, M. (2013). Seven Types of Privacy. In: S. Gutwirth et al. (eds.). European Data Protection: Coming of Age, 3-32. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-5170-5_1.

Fox, G., Clohessy, T., Van der Werff, L., Rosati, P., Lynn, T. (2021). Exploring the competing influences of privacy concerns and positive beliefs on citizen acceptance of contact tracing mobile applications. Computers in Human Behavior, 121, 106806. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2021.106806.

General Data Protection Regulation, 2018. https://gdpr-info.eu/

Gil-Garcia, J. R., Pardo, T. A., Nam, T. (2015). What makes a city smart? Identifying core components and proposing an integrative and comprehensive conceptualization. Information Polity, 20 (1), 61-87. DOI: 10.3233/IP-150354.

Hallinan, D., Friedewald, M., McCarthy, P. (2012). Citizens’perceptions of data protection and privacy in Europe. Computer Law & Security Review, 28 (3), 263-272. DOI: 10.1016/j.clsr.2012.03.005.

Lombardi, P., Giordano, S., Farouh, H., Yousef, W. (2012). Modelling the smart city per- formance. The European Journal of Social Science Research, 25 (2), 137-149. DOI: 10.1080/13511610.2012.660325.

Marković, J. (2023). Information security in the function of business continuity manage- ment. Savremene studije bezbednosti, 1 (2), 11-28. DOI: 10.5937/ssb202301011M. [In Serbian].

McClain, C., Faverio, M., Anderson, M., Park, E. (2023). How Americans View Data Privacy. Pew Research Center. Available at: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2023/10/18/how-americans-view-data-privacy/.

Nam, T. (2018). What determines the acceptance of government surveillance? Examining the influence of information privacy correlates. The Social Science Journal, 56, 530-544. DOI: 10.1016/j.soscij.2018.10.001.

Population Data Portal UNFPA. (n. d.). Percentage of population residing in urban areas. Available at: https://arcg.is/1DuzC1.

Praharaj, S., Han, H. (2019). Cutting through the clutter of smart city definitions: A reading into the smart city perceptions in India. City, Culture and Society, 18, 100289. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccs.2019.05.005.

Putnik, N. R., Milošević, M. M., Cvetković, V. N. (2022). Ransomware as a security threat - Social and criminal legislation aspects. Sociološkipregled, 56 (1), 328-353. DOI: 10.5937/socpreg56-36845.

Silva, B. N., Khan, M., Han, K. (2018). Towards sustainable smart cities: A review of trends, architectures, components, and open challenges in smart cities. Sustainable cities and society, 38, 697-713. DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2018.01.053.

Thomas, V., Mullagh, L., Wang, D., Dunn, N. (2015). Where’s Wally? In Search of Citizen Perspectives on the Smart City. In: D. Kim et al. (eds.). Proceedings of the 8th Conference of the International Forum on Urbanism (IFoU). Basel: MDPI. DOI:10.3390/ifou-A001.

Thompson, N., McGill, T., Bunn, A., Alexander, R. (2020). Cultural factors and the role of privacy concerns in acceptance of government surveillance. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 71 (9), 1129-1142. DOI: 10.1002/asi.24372.

United Nations Human Settlements Programme [UN-Habitat]. (2021). CenteringPeople in Smart Cities: A playbook for local and regional governments. United Nations. Available at: https://unhabitat.org/programme/people-centered-smart-cities/people-centered-smart-cities-playbooks.

Van Zoonen, L. (2016). Privacy Concerns in Smart Cities. Government Information Quarterly, 33 (3), 472-480. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2016.06.004.

Young, A. L., Quan-Haase, A. (2013). Privacy protection strategies on Facebook: The Internet privacy paradox revisited. Information, Communication &Society, 16 (4), 479-500. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2013.777757.