Addiction: Disease and/or Social Construct
Abstract
The paper deals with the concept of addiction and its deconstruction. There are different approaches to its study: as a disease, vice, sin, criminal behavior, social construct, weakness of character, genetically conditioned state, or the combination of the above. We present the development of social thought about addiction in the historical and cultural context and so we reach the “official view of addiction”, which is essentially a biomedical model. Through inconsistencies that come out of it, we “return” addiction to the social context, design a new meaning and consider the future of the concept. In conclusion, we suggest the possibility of overcoming the dichotomy arising from the title in terms of its practical application.
Keywords: addiction, medicalization, inconsistencies of the biomedical model
References
Alexander, B.K., Coambs, R.B., & Hadaway, P.F. (1978). The effect of housing and gender on morphine self-administration in rats. Psychopharmacology, 58(2), 175-179. doi:10.1007/bf00426903
Alexander, B. (2010). The Globalization of Addiction: A Study in Poverty of the Spirit. Oxford University Press (OUP). doi:10.1093/med/9780199588718.001.0001
Alexander, B.K. (2010). A Change of Venue for Addiction: From Medicine to Social Science. Available at:http://www.brucekalexander.com/articles-speeches/
Alexander, B.K. (2010). Addiction: The View from Rat Park. Retrieved November 21 2017 Available at: http://www.brucekalexander.com/articles-speeches/rat-park/148-addiction-theview-from-rat-park
Alexander, B.K. (2018). Treatmen for Addiction: Why Aren`t We Doing Better. In Presentation to Leeds and York Partnership, NHS Foundation Trust. Available at: http://www.brucekalexander.com/articles-speeches/
American Psychiatric Association (APA). (2000).Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association Publishing. doi:10.1176/appi.books.9780890423349
American Psychiatric Association (APA). (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. Washington, DC. 5th Edn.
Bergmark, K.H. (2018). Behavioral addictions-a social science perspective. General Internal Medicine and Clinical Innovations, 3(2), doi:10.15761/gimci.1000159
Bernhard, B.J. (2007). The voices of vices: sociological perspectives on the pathological gambling entry in the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. American Behavioral Scientist, 51(1), 8-32. doi:10.1177/0002764207304869
Buchman, D.Z., Illes, J., & Reiner, P.B. (2011). The Paradox of Addiction Neuroscience. Neuroethics, 4(2), 65-77. doi:10.1007/s12152-010-9079-z
Clark, M. (2011). Conceptualising Addiction: How Useful is the Construct. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, Vol. 1 No. 13 [Special Issue – September 2011 Available at :http://www.ijhssnet.com/journals/Vol_1_No_13_Special_Issue_September_2011/8.pdf
Compton, W.M., Thomas, Y.F., Stinson, F.S., & Grant, B.F. (2007). Prevalence, Correlates, Disability, and Comorbidity of DSM-IV Drug Abuse and Dependence in the United States: Results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Archives of General Psychiatry, 64(5), 566. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.64.5.566
Davies, J. (1997). The Myth of Addiction. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.
Dunbar, D., Kushner, H., & Vrecko, S. (2010). Addiction, biology and culture.BioSocieties,5,1. Available at :https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/biosoc.2009.10.
Fraser, S. (2017). The future of ‘addiction’: Critique and composition. International Journal of Drug Policy, 44, 130-134. doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.05.034
Hart, C. (2013). High price: A neuroscientist’s journey of self-discovery that challenges everything you know about drugs and society. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
Heilig, M., Epstein, D.H., Nader, M.A., & Shaham, Y. (2016). Time to connect: bringing social context into addiction neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 17(9), 592-599. doi:10.1038/nrn.2016.67
Hoffman, J., & Froemke, S. (2007). Addiction: Why Can’t They Just Stop. New York, NY: Rodale.
Jellinek, E.M. (1962). Phases of alcohol addiction. In D.J. Pittman & C. Snyder (Eds.), Society Culture and Drinking Patterns. Carbondale (IL): Southern Illinois Universit Press. Pp. 356-368.
Latour, B. (2010). An attempt at a ‘compositionist manifesto. New Literary History, 41(3), 471–490.
Leshner, A.I. (2001). Addiction is a brain disease. Issues in Science and Technology. Available at: Online, http://www.issues.org/17.3/leshner.htm.
Levine, H.G. (1978). The discovery of addiction. Changing conceptions of habitual drunkenness in America. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 39(1), 143-174. doi:10.15288/jsa.1978.39.143
Levy, N. (2013). Addiction is Not a Brain Disease (and it Matters). Frontiers in Psychiatry, 4, doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2013.00024
Lindesmith, A.R. (1938). A Sociological Theory of Drug Addiction. American Journal of Sociology, 43(4), 593-613. doi:10.1086/217773
National Institute on Drug Abuse. (2007). Drugs, Brains and Behavior: The Science of Addiction. Bethesda MD: National Institutes of Health.
Pickard, H. (2012). The Purpose in Chronic Addiction. AJOB Neuroscience, 3(2), 40-49. doi:10.1080/21507740.2012.663058
Pineaar, K., & Dilkes-Frayne, E. (2017). elling different stories, making new realities: The ontological politics of ‘addiction’ biographies. International Journal of Drug Policy, 44, 145-154 Available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.05.011.
Reinarman, C. (2005). Addiction as accomplishment: The discursive construction of disease.Addiction Research & Theory,13(4), 307-320. doi:10.1080/16066350500077728
Robins, L.N. (1993). Vietnam veterans’ rapid recovery from heroin addiction: a fluke or normal expectation. Addiction, 88(8), 1041-1054. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.1993.tb02123.x
Room, R. (2003). The Cultural framing of addiction. Janus Head, 6(2), 221-234.
Sanders, C. (1994). Workshop Notes: Deconstructing Addiction Mythology. The Calgary Participator, 25-28; 4.
Satel, S., & Lilienfeld, S.O. (2013). Addiction and the brain-disease fallacy. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 4. (141). from doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2013.00141.
Shaffer, H. (2005). From disabling to enabling the public interest: Natural transitions from gambling exposure to adaptation and self-regulation. Addiction, 100(9), 1227-1230. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01200.x
Vrecko, S. (2010). Birth of a brain disease: science, the state and addiction neuropolitics.History of the Human Sciences, 23(4), 52-67. doi:10.1177/0952695110371598
Weinberg, D. (2000). “Out there”: the ecology of addiction in drug abuse treatment discourse. Social Problems, 47(4), 606-621.
Weinberg, T. (2012). The sociology of addiction, in Historical Developments and Theoretical Approaches in Sociology. In -UNESCO-EOLSS Joint Committee (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems(EOLSS). Oxford ,UK: Eolss Publishers. Developed under the Auspices of the UNESCO, [http://www.eolss.net].
Zinberg, N. (1984). Drug, Set, and Setting: The Basis for Controlled Intoxicant Use. London: Yale University Press.
Zobenica, A. (2012). Effect of systemic therapy on alcoholics family resilience. Beograd: Filozofski fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu. (doctoral disseratation), Available at: https://fedorabg.bg.ac.rs/fedora/get/o:6095/bdef:Content/ [In Serbian].