Social implications of women’s language in media discourse
Abstract
This paper deals with linguistic means that characterize women’s speech in a specific type of media discourse – confrontational television interview, their meanings and social implications. The aim of this research is to examine whether linguistic patterns of women’s language in media discourse comprise the basic features of women’s language and which ones, as well as to identify their functions and social implications. The methodological framework draws on Critical Discourse Analysis and the three-dimensional model which analyses the corpus as (1) text, (2) discursive practice, and (3) social practice. The research starts with the assumption that, if the relationship between discourse and society is dialectical, i.e. discourse constitutes society, and is itself influenced by society, changes in the former inevitably cause changes in the latter. Consequently, if women’s social position is reflected in their language, and vice versa, we assume that changes in the social position of women are also reflected in the language they use. Also, by generating changes in the discourse, women can improve their position in society. The results obtained from the analysis largely confirm the initial assumption.
References
BBC, Hardtalk interviews. Available at: http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b006mg2m [09.05.2019]
N1, Pressing interviews. Available at: http://rs.n1info.com/Video/Pressing/a439174/Pressing.html [09.05.2019]
Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and subversion of identity. New York and London. Routledge.
Eckert, P. & McConnell-Ginet, S. (2003). Language and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Edwards, J. (2009). Language and identity. Key topics in sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fairclough N. (1989, 2001). Language and power. London: Longman.
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis: the Critical Study of Language. London: Longman.
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.
Filipović, J. (2011). Gender and Language. In I. Milojević, S. Markov (eds), Introduction to gender theories, 409–423. Novi Sad: Centar za rodne studije & Mediterran Publishing.[In Serbian]
Giddens, A. (1986). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Holmes, J. (2001). An introduction to sociolinguistics. London. Longman.
Holmes, M. (2007). What is gender? Sociological Approches. LA: SAGE Publications.
Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and Woman’s place. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lakoff, R. (2004). Language and Woman’s place – Revisited. In M. Bucholtz (ed.) Language and Woman’s place, Text and Commentaries, 15–28. Revised and Expanded Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nikolić, M. (2017). An attempt at defining the confrontational interview. Anali Filološkog fakulteta, 29/1, 125–148 [In Serbian]
Palmer, F. R. (1979). Modality and the English modals. London: Longman.
Risman, B, Froyum, C, Scarborough, W. J. (Eds.) (2018). Handbook of the Sociology of Gender. Second Edition. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Risman, B. (2011). Gender as structure or trump card? Journal of family theory and review, 3 (1), 18–21
Rogers, R. 2004. An Introduction to Critical Discourse Analysis in Education. In R. Rogers (ed.) An Introduction to Critical Discourse Analysis in Education, 1–18. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Sunderland, J. (2006). Language and Gender: An advanced resource book. London: Routledge.
Sunderland, J. & Litosseliti, Lia. (2002). Gender identity and discourse analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamin Publishing.
Tetlock, P. & Belkin, A. (1996). Counterfactual Thought Experiments in World Politics: Logical, Methodological, and Psychological Perspectives. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2001). Critical Discourse Analysis. In D. Schiffrin et al. (eds.) Handbook of Discourse Analysis, 352–371. Maiden: Blackwell.