Rational choice theory – limitations and alternatives

  • Miloš S. Krstić University of Niš, Faculty of Science and Mathematics, Niš (Serbia)
Keywords: bounded rationality, procedural rationality, ecological rationality, homo heuristicus, heuristics, cognitive bias, rational choice theory

Abstract


In the focus of the paper there are some basic insights and ideas of rational choice theory, that is the “core” of contemporary economic theory. Also, rational choice theory is the “center” of modern political science and is used in various other scientific disciplines, such as: sociology, philosophy, political science, psychology and the like. There are two main goals of this paper. One is to point out the limitations of rational choice theory as one of the theories of economic behavior (and decision making). The second goal is to analyze psychological programs of research of heuristics and bias in behavioral economics and to consider the importance of alternative concepts, models and theories from the point of view of improving the understanding of economic and social behavior.

Author Biography

Miloš S. Krstić, University of Niš, Faculty of Science and Mathematics, Niš (Serbia)

Naučni saradnik na projektu "Unapređenje konkurentnosti javnog i privatnog sektora umrežavanjem kompetencija u procesu evropskih integracija Srbije" koji realizuje Ekonomski fakultet u Nišu i finansira Ministarstvo prosvete, nauke i tehnološkog razvoja RS

References

Akerlof, G. (2007). The missing motivation in macroeconomics. American Economic Review, 97(1), 5-36.

Akerlof, G, & Shiller, R. (2009). Animal spirits. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Bhagwati, J. (2011). Markets and morality. American Economic Review, 101(3), 162-165.

Boudon, R. (2003). Beyond rational choice theory. Annual review of sociology, 29(1), 1-21.

Bosman, R, Matthias, S, Franz, W. (2005). The impact of real effortand emotions in the power-to-take game. Journal of Economic Psychology, 26 (3), 407-429.

Buchanan, J. (1991). Constitutional economics. London: Basil Blackwell.

Camerer, C, Loewenstein, G, & Rabin, M. (2004). Advances in behavioral economics. Princeton: Princeton university press.

Coleman, J. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge: Mass. Harvard University Press.

Damnjanović, K, & Janković, I. (2014). Normative and descriptive theory of decision-making in risk conditions, Theoria, 57(4), 25-50. [In Serbian]

Edwards, W. (1954). The theory of decision making, Psychological bulletin, 51(4), 380-417.

Ellingsen, T, & Johannesson, M. (2007). Paying respect, Journal of Economic Perspectives,21(4), 135-150.

Elster, J. (1998). Emotions and economic theory, Journal of economic literature, 36(1), 47-74.

Elster, J. (2009). Interpretation and rational choice, Rationality and Society, 21(1), 5-33.

Golubović, N. (2011). Social economics – economic activity in the social environment. Niš: Ekonomski fakultet. [In Serbian]

Gigerenzer, G, Reinhard, S. (2001). Bounded rationality and the adaptive toolbox. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Gigerenzer, G. (2008). Why heuristics work, Perspectives on psychological science, 3(1),20-29.

Gigerenzer, G, Hertwig. R, Thorsten, P. (2011). Heuristics: the foundations of adaptive Behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.

Gigerenzer, G, & Sturm, T. (2012). How (far) can rationality be naturalized?, Synthese, 187(1), 243-268.

Glaeser, E. L. (2013). A nation of gamblers: Real estate speculation and American history, American Economic Review, 103(3), 1-42.

Hands, D. W. (2015). Normative rational choice theory: past, present, and future, Present, and Future (March 2015).

Hafner, P, Krstić, M. (2014). Rational economic behaviour–interdisciplinary approach, Ekonomika, 60(4), 155-164. [In Serbian]

Hechter, M, & Kanazawa, S. (1997). Sociological rational choice theory, Annual review of sociology, 23(1), 191-214.

Heukelom, F. (2011). Behavioral economics. In: J. B. Davis, D. W. Hands (eds.) The Elgar Companion to Recent Economic Methodology (19-38). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Hodgson, G. (2012). On the limits of rational choice theory, Economic Thought, 1, 94-108.

Kahneman, D, & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk, Econometrica, 47(2), 363-391.

Kahneman, D. (2003) Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics, American Economic Review, 93(5): 1449-1475.

Kahneman, D. (2015). Thinking, fast and slow. Smederevo: Heliks. [In Serbian]

Keynes, M. (1960). The general theory of employment, interest and money. London: Macmillan.

Klaes, M, Sent, E. M. (2005). A conceptual history of the emergence of bounded rationality, History of political economy, 37(1), 27-59.

Kliemt, H. (1990). Commitment and Rules. In: H. Kliemt (ed.) Papers on Buchanan and Related Subjects (72-95). Munich: Accedo.

Krstić, B, Krstić, M. (2015). Models of rational decision making in contemporary economic theory. Megatrend Review, 12(3), 67-87. [In Serbian]

Lahno, B. (2007), Rational choice and rule-following behavior, Rationality and Society, 19(4), 425-450.

Lee, K. S. (2011). Three ways of linking laboratory endeavours to the realm of policies, The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 18(5), 755-776.

Loewenstein, G. (2000). Emotions in economic theory and economic behavior, American economic review, 90(2), 426-432.

Mathis, K, & Steffen, A. D. (2015). From rational choice to behavioural economics. In European Perspectives on Behavioural Law and Economics (31-48). Springer, Cham.

Opp, K. D. (2011). Modeling micro-macro relationships: Problems and solutions, The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 35(1-3), 209-234.

Pavličić, D. (2007). The theory of decision making. Beograd: Centar za izdavačku delatnost Ekonomskog fakulteta.[In Serbian]

Polšek, D, Bokulić, M. (2013). Two paradigms in bihevioral economics. In: D. Polšek, K. Bovan (eds.) Introduction into behavioural economics of heuristics and bias (5-24). Zagreb: Institut društvenih znanosti Ivo Pilar u Zagrebu.[In Croatian]

Resnik, M. D. (1987). Choices: An introduction to decision theory. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.

Rosen, S. (2002). Markets and diversity, American Economic Review, 92(1), 1-15.

Sen, A. (1976). Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioural Foundations of Economic Theory, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 6(4), 317-344.

Simon, H. (1955). A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69 (1), 99-118.

Simon, H. (1961). Administrative behaviour. New York: Macmillan.

Simon, H. (1967). Models of man: social and rational. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

Stiglitz, J. E. (2002). Information and the Change in the Paradigm in Economics, American economic review, 92(3), 460-501.

Tversky, A, Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases, Science, 185(4157), 1124-1131.

Thaler, R. (1989). Anomalies: interindustry wage differentials, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3(2), 181-193.

Thaler, R. (1994). Quasi-rational economics. New York: Russell Sage.

Thaler, R. (2016). Behavioral economics: Past, present, and future, American Economic Review, 106(7), 1577-1600.

Von Neumann, J, & Morgenstern, O. (1947). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Vanberg, V. (1994). Rules and Choice in Economics. London: Routledge.

Козелецкий, Ю. (1979). Психологическая теория решений. Москва: Рипол Классик.

Шаститко, А. (1998). Модели рационального экономического поведения человека. Вопросы экономики, (5), 53-67.

Швери, Р. (1997). Теория рационального выбора: универсальное средство или экономический империализм?. Вопросы экономики, (7), 35-51.

Published
2020/04/30
Section
Review scientific paper