(Non)success of Transitional Reforms in the Countries of Former Yugoslavia

  • Ivana М. Božić Miljković University Singidunum
Keywords: transition, reforms, economy, former Yugoslavia, European Union,

Abstract


The paper analyzes the economic effects of the transition process in the countries of the former Yugoslavia, with particular reference to those segments of that process that define the directives for their economic and institutional development. The results of the transition process are also analyzed in terms of the position of these countries vis-à-vis the European Union. The countries of the former Yugoslavia have achieved different results in the transition period so far in terms of membership in this integration and these results have been accepted by some researchers as the standard for evaluating their success in the transition process. If one assumes that membership in the Union alone is a “certificate of success” and an indicator of the end of the transition process, it can be said that only Slovenia and Croatia have succeeded in implementing the transitional reforms. However, according to economic indicators, the two countries share the fate of the other former Yugoslav republics and their success in the transition process is judged to be modest.

Author Biography

Ivana М. Božić Miljković, University Singidunum
Poslovni fakultet, docent

References

Božić Miljković, I. (2018). The economies of the Balkan countries at the beginning of the XXI century. Beograd: Institut za međunarodnu politiku i privredu [In Serbian]

Božić, M. (2005). Serbia at the beginning of the 21. Century: the state of economy and the process of social and economic reforms. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Nišu 46(2005), Niš: Pravni fakultet, 35-58 [In Serbian]

Božić, M. (2009). Deindustrialization in transition countries and its economic consequences. Teme XXXIII 2/2009, 423-442 [in Serbian]

Budak, J. i Sumpor, M. (2009), New institutional economics and institutional convergence. Ekonomski pregled 60 (3-4) 168-195 [In Serbian]

Buterin, V. (2015). Institutional change – a factor in attracting investment in transition countries. Praktični menadžment, Vol. VI, (1) 30-40

Despotović, Lj. (2017). Globalization and the geopolitics of identity. Sremski Karlovci: Kairos. [In Serbian]

Družić, I. (2003) Market restructuring and privatization of the Croatian economy. In I. Družić (ed.) Croatian Economic Development, 137-173 Zagreb: Ekonomski fakultet Sveučilišta u Zagrebu i Politička kultura [In Serbian]

Golubović, Z. (2004). Elements of a critique of neoliberal model of transition. Sociološki pregled, XXXVIII (1-2), 5-21 doi:10.5937/socpreg0402005G [in Serbian]

http://arhivanalitika.hr/blog/siva-ekonomija-u-hrvatskoj-sto-pokazuju-podaci-opotrosnji/ Retrieved 20.04.2019.

Jakšić, D. & Bomeštar, N. (2011).Price of transition and transition losses in the CEE countries with a special focus on BIH. http://www.makroekonomija.org/bih/cijenatranzicije-i-tranzicioni-gubici-u-zemljama-cee-sa-posebnim-osvrtom-na-bih/ Retrieved 15.05.2019.

Lazić, M. (2011). The post-socialist transformation in Serbia: Social actors and social change. In: S. Mihajlović (ed) Transition results - from socialism to capitalism. Edition: 20 years of transition from socialism to capitalism Beograd: Fridrich Ebert Stiftung, CSSD i CESID, 41-56 [In Serbian]

Mitrović, Lj. (2017). In the jaws of transition: between the daffodils and the alternatives. Final word for transition of transition and alternative society). Niš: Filozofski fakultet, Novi Sad: Prometej [In Serbian]

Praščević, A. (2014). Big debates in Macroeconomics: the end of radical antiKeynesianism? In: B. Jovanović Gavrilović (ed.) Ekonomska politika i razvoj, 1-22. Beograd: Ekonomski fakultet [in Serbian]

Reinert. E.S. (2006). Global economy: How Rich Countries Got Rich and Why Poor Countries Stay Poor. Beograd: Čigoja štampa [In Serbian]

Smiljković, R. (2011). Moral-economic crisis of bourgeois restoring in Serbia and responsibility of elite in power. Politička revija (2), 125-156 https://doi.org/10.22182/pr.2822011.8 [In Serbian]

Šuvaković, U. (2014). Transition: a contribution to the sociological study of social change. Kosovska Mitrovica: Filozofski fakultet Univerziteta u Prištini [In Serbian]

The World Bank. https://databank.worldbank.org/data/reports.aspx?source=2&country=SVN,MKD Retrieved 18.05.2019.

The World Bank. Transition: First ten years. Analysis and lessons for Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union.

http://siteresources.worldbank.org/SERBIAEXTN/Resources/300903-1106760681824/TRANZICIJA_Prvih_10_Godina.pdf Retrieved 20.05.2019. [in Serbian]

UNCTAD Handbook of Statistics database: https://unctadstat.unctad.org/wds/TableViewer/tableView.aspx Retrieved 15.05.2019.

UN Statistics: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/snaama/CountryProfile? Retrieved 20.04.2019.

Vidojević, Z. (1997). Transition, restoration and neo-totalitarism. Beograd: Institut društvenih nauka. [In Serbian]

Vidojević, Z. (2015). Defeats and alternatives: The threat of desolation and the ethics of resistance. Beograd: Zavod za udžbenike. In Serbian]

Vratuša, V. (2012). The transition – from where to where? The first vol.. Beograd: Čigoja [In Serbian]

Published
2019/11/01
Section
Review scientific paper