Solitary Confinement Of Inmates As A Form Of Extreme Marginalization
Abstract
Confinement of persons, perpetrators of acts that the community deems unacceptable prior to being sanctioned or punished is a phenomenon that goes back to the earliest period of human civilization. It was not until the transition from the Middle Ages to the new century that it became a legally regulated way of responding to crime. With the introduction of the punishment of confinement in the register of criminal sanctions, the first institutions which carried out confinement were created. Interestingly, the first conceived modality of confinement entailed strict solitary confinement and was soon abandoned due to the serious shortcomings it showed. However, in the last decades of the twentieth century, with the establishment of supermax units, this model has re-emerged, first in the United States and then in many other countries. Although numerous studies have shown how harmful this type of punishment to persons who are isolated for a long time is, the model survives and even shows a tendency to spread. Serbia’s legal system has also not been spared of the new mode of marginalization of confined persons, which applies to the perpetrators of most serious crimes, and above all those belonging to the category of organized crime. Recent changes to the criminal code create the possibility of coming even closer to the model existing in the US, as well as expanding the circle of persons to whom it shall apply.
References
Całkowska, K. (2018). American penitentary systems at the beginning of the 19th century through the eyes of European intellectuals, CRIMEN 9 (3), 303–320
Clear, T., Cole, G., Reisig, M. (2006). American Corrections, 7th ed., Belomont: Thomson Wadsworth
Collica K. (2005). Special housing units. In M. Bosworth (ed) Encyclopedia of Prisons & Correctional Facilities, 913–917. Thousand Oaks, Sage Publ.
Davis A. (2005). Race, gender and prison history: from the convict lease system to supermax prisons. In D. Britton (ed) Gender and Prison. Aldershot: Ashgate Publ.
Hafemeister, T., George, J. (2013). The ninth cyrcle of hell: an Eight Amandment analysis of imposing prolonged solitary confinement on inmates with a mental illness, Denver University Law Review 90 (1), 1–54
Haney, C. (2005). Supermax prisons. In M. Bosworth (ed) Encyclopedia of Prisons & Correctional Facilities, 938–944. Thousand Oaks, Sage Publ.
Hannem-Kish, S. (2005). Solitary confinement. In M. Bosworth (ed) Encyclopedia of Prisons & Correctional Facilities, 909–912. Thousand Oaks, Sage Publ.
Hresko T. (2006). In the cellars of hollow men – use of solitary confinement in U.S. prisons and its implications under international laws against torture, Pace International Law Review 18 (1), 1–27.
Ignjatović, Đ. (2018). Controversions of imprisonment and prisons, Sociologija 55 (4), 750–768 [in Serbian]
Ignjatović, Đ. (2018a). Criminology, 14th ed. Beograd: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu [in Serbian]
Ignjatović, Đ. (2018b). Penal Sanctions Execution Law, 6th ed. Beograd: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu [in Serbian]
Jackson M. (1983). Prisoners of Isolation: Solitary Confimenent in Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press
Jackson M. (2015). Reflections on 40 years of advocacy to end the isolation of Canadian prisons, Canadian Journal od Human Rights 4 (1), 57–87.
Jeffreys D. (2013). Spirituality in Dark Places – The Ethics of Solitary Confinement. New York: Palgrave Macmillan
Johnson, H., Wolfe, N. (1996). History of Criminal Justice, 2nd ed., Cincinnati: Anderson Publ.
Kaba F. et al. (2012). Solitary confinement and risk of self-harm among jail inmates, American Journal of Public Health 104 (3), 442–447
Mushlin M. (2012). Unlocating the courthouse door …, Federal Sentencing Reporter 24(4), 268–275
Newburn T. (2002). Atlantic crossing – ’Policy transfer’ and crime control in the USA and Britain, Punishment & Society 4 (2), 165–194
Parkes D. (2015). Ending the isolation – An introductory to special volume on human rights and solitary confinement, Canadian Journal on Human Rights 4 (1), vii-xiii
Piché J. (2016). Playing the “treasury card” to contest prison expansions: lessons from public criminology campaign, Social Justice 41 (3), 145–167
Piché, J., Major, K. (2015). Prisoner writing in / on solitary confinement: contributions from the Journal of Prisoners on Prisons (1988–2013), Canadian Journal of Human Rights 4 (1), 1–31
Pizzaro, J., Stenius, V. (2009). Supermax prison – their rise, current pratctices and effect on inmates. In M. Stohr, A. Walsh, C. Hemmens (eds.) Corrections –Text / Reader. Los Angeles: Sage Publ.
Ross J. (2007). Supermax prisons, Social Science and Modern Society 44 (3), 60–64
Rovner L. (2015). Dignity and Eight Amendment – new approach to challenging solitary confinement, Advance (9), 3–20
Rovner L. (2017). On litigating constitutional challenges to the supermax – improving conditions and shining a light, Denver Law Review 95 (2), 458–517
Schalanger M. (2012). Prison segregation – Symposium introduction and preliminary date on racial disparities, Michigan Journal of Race & Law 18/2013, 241–250
Shalev S. (2009). Supermax – Controlling Risk Through Solitary Confinement. Portland: Willan Publ.
Shalev S. (2015). Solitary confinement – the view from Europe, Canadian Journal of Human Rights 4 (1), 143–165
Stohr, M., Walsh, A., Hemmens, C. (2009) Corrections – A Text / Reader. Los Angeles: Sage Publ.
Sykes G. (1958). Society of Captives: A Study of Maximum Security Prison. Princeton: Pricenton University Press