Coronavirus in the (bio)political imaginarium

  • Tijana D. Perić Dilgenski Institute for Political Studies, Belgrade (Serbia)
Keywords: biopolitics, coronavirus, pandemic, quarantine, life

Abstract


The paper starts from the premise that (bio)political engineering of conservatively profiled political actors during the coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic was determined by economic calculations. The coronavirus imaginarium exposed the logic of the neoliberal market economy and pointed to the need to deconstruct the existing and establish a new economic paradigm. The findings of the paper show that the pandemic has brought to light an infection of non-solidarity and intolerance towards the phenomenon of otherness, which is accused of being a contagious factor. The paper elaborates that democratic ways of governing are overshadowed by populist manners that tend to use the narrative of fear of viruses to consolidate their own regimes.

References

Agamben, G. (2006). Homo sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Zagreb: Multimedijalni institut, Arkzin [In Croatian]

Alon, I., Farrell, M., Li, S. (2020). Regime Type and COVID-19 Response. Perspective FIIB Business Review SAGE Journals, 9 (3), 152–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/2319714520928884

Aven, T. (2015). Implications of black swans to the foundations and practice of risk assessment and management. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, Science Direct Vol. 134, 83–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2014.10.004

Basbay, M. (2020). Reordering Capitalism A New Economic World Order Post COVID-19, Discussion Paper. Istanbul: TRT World Research Centre

Delumeau, J. (1987). Fear in the West (From XIV to XVIII century), Obsessed city, I & II. Novi Sad: Dnevnik ‒ Književna zajednica Novog Sada [In Serbian]

Gržinić, M. (2010). From biopolitics to necropolitics and institution of contemporary art. Pavilion. Journal of Politics and Culture (14), 9–93.

Kochi, T. (2020). A Violence Which Must Be Named Critique in Times of Coronavirus Available at https://criticallegalthinking.com/2020/04/29/a-violence-which-must-benamed-critique-in-times-of-coronavirus/

Krastev, I. (2020). A Pandemic of Nostalgia. How the coronavirus is changing Europe. Zagreb: TIM PRES [In Croatian]

Maboloc, C. (2020). Globalization and Consumer Culture: Social costs and Political Implications of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics vol. 30 (3), 77–79.

Magen, A. (2018). Fighting terrorism: The democracy advantage. Journal of Democracy vol. 29 (1), 111–125.

Martens, Ј., Seitz, К. (2015). Philanthropic Power and Development Who shapes the agenda? Bonn: Global Policy Forum

Megret, F. (2020). Returning Home: Nationalist International Law in the Time of the Coronavirus in COVID-19 and International Law, Opinio Iuris Symposium (MarchApril 2020), Barrie Sander and Jason Rudall (eds.) Available at https://opiniojuris.org/2020/03/30/covid-19-symposium-returning-home-nationalist-international-law-in-the-time-of-the-coronavirus/

Newheiser, D. (2016). Foucault, Gary Becker and the Critique of Neoliberalism. Theory, Culture and Society Vol. 35 (5), 3–21. doi: 10.1177/0263276415619997

Perić Diligenski, T. (2018). Political corruption and clientelism – per genus et differentiam. In: B. Đorđević (ed.) Constitutionalism and Constitutional Design in Democratic Recession Proceedings of the 2018 Serbian Political Science Association Annual Conference (343–356). Beograd: Udruženje za političke nauke Srbije [In Serbian]

Perić Diligenski, T. (2019). Anti-migrant discursive matrix as political narrative. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Novom Sadu vol. 53 (4), 1319–1330. doi: 10.5937/zrpfns53-23993, Available at http://zbornik.pf.uns.ac.rs/images/download/2019/2019-4/doi_10.5937_zrpfns53-23993.pdf [In Serbian]

Pollard, M. (2020). The Use of Criminal Sanctions in COVID-19 Responses – Enforcement of Public Health Measures, Part II. In B. Sander and J. Rudall (eds) in COVID-19 and International Law, Opinio Iuris Symposium (March-April 2020). Available at https://opiniojuris.org/2020/03/30/covid-19-symposium-returning-home-nationalist-international-law-in-the-time-of-the-coronavirus/

Ringen, S. (2016). The Perfect Dictatorship: China in the 21st Century. Hong Kong: HKU Press

Sheptycki, J. (2020). The politics of policing a pandemic panic. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology vol. 53 (2), 157–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004865820925861

Tanzeem, A. (2020). Survival as Societal Value, Biopolitics in Times of Corona. International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews Vol. 7 (22), 592–599.

Tlostanova, M. (2011). From bio-politics and necro-politics to geo-politics and body-politics of knowledge. RUDN Journal of Philosophy (1), 39–48.

Urošević, М. (2020). Subject in the work of Michael Foucault - the reflexive subject and governmentality theory. Sociološki pregled vol. LIV (1), 64–74. doi: 10.5937/socpreg54-23067

Verma, R. (2020). China’s diplomacy and changing the COVID-19 narrative. International Journal: Canada’s Journal of Global Policy Analysis 0 (0), 1–11. doi: 10.1177/0020702020930054 Available at https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0020702020930054

Vuletić, V. (2019). Global neoconservative turn. Sociološki pregled 53 (2), 403–411. doi:10.5937/socpreg53-21883

Žižek, S. (2020, March, 16). Monitor and Punish? Yes, please! Available at https://thephilosophicalsalon.com/monitor-and-punish-yes-please/

Published
2020/10/04
Section
Original scientific paper