The image of COVID-19 in the Serbian daily newspapers
Abstract
This work is focused on reporting of daily newspapers in Serbia during coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, and specifics of dominant narratives and relationship between the government and popular press. The content research includes the first half of 2020, when 1,271 from eight influential daily papers were analysed. While the representatives of the quality press have tried to steer the attention of citizens and introduce serious questions most tabloids trivialised the danger as another spectacle which will secure larger sales irrespective of social consequences and ethical norms of journalistic profession. Objectivity and unbiasedness are sacrificed for sensationalism, spectacle and political clientelism. Celebritization of medical profession has only led to spread of confusion in public opinion, while revealing how political elites eagerly use crisis for promotion of their own ideas and programs, instead of professional debate.
References
Chase, W. H. (1982). Issue management conference: A special report. Corporate public issues and their management, 7, 1–2.
COVID-19 – Basic information (2020). Ministarstvo zdravlja Republike Srbije. Available at https://covid19.rs/o-covid-19-virusu. [In Serbian]
Entman, R. M. (2004). Projections of power: Framing news, public opinion, and U.S. foreign policy. Chicago: University of Chicago press.
Gemius Audience (2020, June). The most visited websites in Serbia. Available at https://rating.gemius.com/rs/tree/32.
Jevtović, Z., Bajić, P. (2017). The change of communication paradigm on the reporting of migrants in Serbian daily press. Kultura polisa 14 (special edition 2), 221–239. https://kpolisa.com/KPP2017_2a/KPP2017KulturaBezbednosti.pdf [In Serbian]
Jevtović, Z., Bajić, P. (2018). Cultural policy on the front pages of daily newspapers in Serbia. Kultura, (160), 274–290. doi: 10.5937/kultura1860274J[In Serbian]
Jevtović, Z., Bajić, P. (2019). The failed transition of Serbian media system. Sociološki pregled, 53 (3), 1020–1045. doi: 10.5937/socpreg53-22587.
Katz, E., Blumler J. & Gurevitch, M. (1973). Uses and gratifications research. The public opinion quarterly, 37 (4), 509–523. DOI: 10.1086/268109.
Kovach, B. & Rosenstiel, T. (2006). The elements of journalism: what newspeople should know and the public should expect. Podgorica: CID. [In Serbian]
Milutinović, I. (2019). Crisis of professional journalism in the transitional society of Serbia. Sociološki pregled, 53 (3), 1046–1070. doi: 10.5937/socpreg53-21945
Perloff, R. M. (2014). The dynamics of political communication: Media and politics in a digital age. New York: Routledge.
Reljić, S. (2013). Ownership concentration and the change of media character and role. Sociološki pregled, 47 (1), 109–122. doi: 10.5937/socpreg1301109R [In Serbian]
Rojek, C. (2001). Celebrity. London: Reaktion books.
Severin, W. J. & Tankard, J. W. (2001). Communication theories: Origins, methods, and uses in the mass media (fifth edition). New York: Longman.
Stanić, M. (2020, May 12). Analysis of online media in the age of coronavirus: Dizzying growth in the number of readers “killed” the engagement of the audience. Cenzolovka. Available at https://www.cenzolovka.rs/mediologija/analiza-onlajn-medija-u-doba-korone-vrtoglavi-rast-broja-citalaca-ubio-angazman-publike. [In Serbian]
Thompson, K. (2003). Moral panics. Belgrade: Clio. [In Serbian]
Timeline of EU action (2020). European Commission. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/info/live-work-travel-eu/health/coronavirus-response/timeline-eu-action_en.
Timeline of WHO’s response to COVID-19 (last updated 30 June 2020). World Health Organization. Available at https://www.who.int/news-room/detail/29-06-2020-covidtimeline.