Problems of aggression in authoritarian leadership in large groups – psychoanalytic and group-analytic view

  • Jasna J. Veljković University of Belgrade, Faculty of Political Sciences, Department of Social Policy and Social Work, Belgrade (Serbia)
Keywords: large group, leader, group dynamics, group processes, aggression

Abstract


Man is a being of a group that spends most of his life in groups distinguished by leadership, structure, type and organization. The human individual moves in the range between opposite tendencies: to belong to a group and be “invisible” in it or to be visible and become a leader. In this paper, our goal is theoretical research of the problems of sociodynamics and psychodynamics of aggression in large groups depending on the type of leadership. Research methods are: psychoanalytic and group-analytic methods. Our findings are that the occurrence of aggression in large groups is inevitable, but types and manifestations of aggression in large groups differ significantly, depending on the type of leadership in a large group (democratic or authoritarian), group cohesion, establishment or non-establishment of group identity and selection of group members.

References

Bion, W. R. (1983). Experience in Groups. Zagreb: Nаprijed [In Croatiаn]

Bridger, H. (2000). Northfield revisited. In: M. Pines (ed.). Bion and Group Psychotherapy (87–107). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul

De Maré, P., Schollberger, R. (2003). The Larger Group as a Meeting of Minds. In: S. Schneider and H. Weinberg (eds.) The Large Group Re-Visited – The Herd, Primal Horde, Crowds and Masses (214–233). London and New York: Jessica Kingsley Publisher

De Maré, P. (2018). The Larger Group as a meeting of minds: a philosophical understanding. In: Lenn, R., Stefano, К. (eds.) Small, Large and Median Groups. The Work of Patrick de Maré (151–161). London: Routledge

De Maré, P. (2018). Politics of Large Groups. In: Lenn, R., Stefano K. (eds.) Small, Large and Median Groups. The Work of Patrick de Maré (61–75). London: Routledge

Foulkes, S., Anthony, E. J. (1984). Group Psychotherapy, The psychoanalytical approach. London: Maresfield Reprints

Freud, S. (1981). The future of an illusion. Hogarth Press London: Standard Edition, Vol. 18, 13.

Freud, S. (1933) Why war?. In: Standard edition the of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, London: Hogarth Press, Collected Papers V

Freud, S. (1979). Moses and Monotheism. Beograd: Grafos [In Serbian]

Glover, E. (2001). War, sadism and pacifism. In: Ž. Martinović and M. Martinović (eds) Psychoanalysis and war (41–44). Beograd: Čigoja štampa [In Serbian]

Kellermann, P. F. (2007). Sociodrama and Collective Trauma. London and Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publsihers.

Kohut, H. (2004). The Analysis of the Self. Zagreb: Naprijed. [In Croatian]

Kernberg, O. (2004). Object-relations theory and Clinical Psychoanalysis. New York, Toronto, Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc.

Nitsun, M. (2014).The Anti-Group: Destructive Forces in the Group and their Creative Potential. London: Routledge

Scheidlinger, S. (1982). On Scapegoating in Group Psychotherapy. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, Vol. 32 (2), 131–145.

Turque, P. (1975).Threats to identity in the large group. In L. Kreeger (ed.) The Large group: Dynamics and Therapy. London: Constable

Veljković, J. (2014). Psychodrama changes. Beograd: Zadužbina Andrejević. [In Serbian]

Veljković, J., Despotović, V. (2017). The Sociodrama Narrative: Political Aspects. Serbian Political Thought, No.1/2017, 93–110. https://doi.org/10.22182/spt.1512017.6

Veljković, J., Đurić, Z. (2003). Psychodrama and Sociodrama. Beograd: Centar za primenjenu psihologiju. [In Serbian]

Volkan, V. (2001). Transgenerational transmission and chosen traumas: an aspect of large group identity. Group Analysis 34 (1), 79–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/05333160122077730

Yalom, I., Leszcz, M., (2013). Theory and Practice of Group Psychotherapy. Novi Sad: Psihopolis Institut. [In Serbian]

Published
2021/04/08
Section
Review scientific paper