The crossroads of contemporary sociology and the crisis of its subject and vocational identity
Abstract
Contemporary sociology is at a fateful crossroads. The paper points to some aspects of its crisis as a science and vocation, the forms of its cognitive pathology and the erosion of positive identity in the universe of sciences and the modern professional division of labour. Indicating the causes and consequences of this crisis, the author concludes that it cannot be overcome only by technical improvement of the methodology of empirical research, but requires profound efforts of the new generation of sociologists, and new answers. Otherwise, Peter Berger’s pessimistic predictions about the obsolescence and bankruptcy of sociologists and sociologists might come true. The conclusions we reached in our problematization of this issue can be summarized as follows: 1) the need to redefine contemporary sociology in the spirit of globalization of its subject as a multicomplex science of the laws of structure and dynamics of the global world system and the theoretical-empirical study of phenomena and processes at all levels of social organization. macro, meso, micro) from the perspective of the methodological principle of dialectical concrete totality; 2) building a new theoretical synthesis in the form of a multidisciplinary integrated paradigm; 3) opening sociology through multidisciplinary and transdisciplinary research towards new challenging fields of the future that has begun; 4) redefining its vocation identity in the Mils-Bourdieu key as a martial discipline, radical-critical, reflexive-engaged, emancipatory and actionist sociology.
References
Aron, R. (1967). Les étapes de la pensée socilogique. Paris: Gallimard [In French]
Berger, P. (1992/2006). Sociology: A Disinvitation?, Žurnal za sociologiju, No. 4/2006, 191–203. [In Serbian]
Castells, M. (2000–2003). The information age : economy, society and culture, vol. 1–3. Zagreb: Golden marketing [In Croatian]
Goldmann, L. (1962). Recherches dialectiques. Sarajevo: Veselin Masleša [In Serbian]
Gouldner, A. (1973/1980). For Sociology. Zagreb: Globus [In Serbian]
Gurvitch, G. (1962). Dialectique et Sociologie. Paris: Flammarion [In French]
Habermas, J. (1963/1980). Theorie und Praxis. Beograd: BIGZ [In Serbian]
Habermas, J. (2017). Theory of Communicative Action I–II. Novi Sad: Akademska knjiga [In Serbian]
Kosík, K. (1963/1967). Dialectics of the Concrete. Beograd: Prosveta [In Serbian]
Lukács, G. (1923/1967). History & Class Consciousness. The Merlin Press Ltd. Available at: https://www.marxists.org/archive/lukacs/works/history/
Marković, M. (1981). Philosophical Foundations of Science. Beograd: SANU [In Serbian]
Mitrović, Lj. (1982). Sociological Study of Sociology, Sociološki pregled, 16 (3), 99–109. Available at http://www.socioloskipregled.org.rs/2017/08/20/socioloski-pregled-1982/ [In Serbian]
Milić, V. (1965). Sociological method. Beograd: NOLIT [In Serbian]
Mitrović, Lj (1984). Sociology and Modernity. Niš: Gradina [In Serbian]
Supek, R. (1983). Sociologist’s Craft. Zagreb: Školska knjiga [In Serbian]
Touraine, A. (1969/1980). Pour la sociologie. In Touraine, A. (1980). La société post-industrielle. Zagreb: Globus [In Serbian]
Touraine, A. (1981). Une sociologie sans société. Revue française de sociologie 22 (1), Jan.- Mar., 3-13. https://doi.org/10.2307/3321182
Touraine, A. (2005/2011). Un nouveau paradigme: Pour comprendre le monde d’aujourd’hui. Beograd: Službeni glasnik [In Serbian]
Wallerstein, I. (2004). The Decline of American Power. Podgorica: CID [In Serbian]
Wallerstein, I. (2005). World-systems Analysis: An Introduction. Cetinje: Otvoreni kulturni forum [In Serbian]
Wallerstein, I. (2012). The Modern World System. Podgorica: CID [In Serbian]