Gated communities in Еurope – fashionability or a social challenge?
Abstract
This paper deals with the poorly researched concept of fenced settlements (housing policy), which was developed in the USA in the middle of the 20th century, but has recently been particularly affirmed in neo-liberal society, all over the world. Walled settlements also exist in social-democratic Europe, and the article studies the consequences of applying this concept, i.e. the influence of fenced settlements on the democratic spirit of the city and the democratic and development potential of the city, on the example of cities in Europe (France, Britain and Ireland) with lessons learned.
Gated settlements have a number of negative effects on the community. For the needs of fenced communities, authorities often privatize roads, public spaces, and access to remaining public areas, to the detriment of the majority of residents, for whom entire complexes in the city remain inaccessible. This creates numerous social and spatial injustices, which actively undermines the democratic capacity of the city. These processes are in conflict with the democratic concept of the open city and the model of mixed housing, cultivated during the welfare state.
The article relies on the analyses of existing research and studies of fenced settlements in the world through indicative examples and case studies (content analysis, synthesis, generalization, comparison). Statistical methods, analysis of regulatory changes, interviews and surveys of tenants, development managers, politicians and officials were often used in these studies. The comparative method in this paper compares the similarities and differences of fenced settlements in various countries, which is the basis for conclusions and recommendations for optimal housing policy and urban development (synthesis).
The article introduces this challenging topic into the debate space of political and social sciences (field of urban studies), presents the existing consequences, and through comparison allows us to synthetically arrive at recommendations for choosing the optimal housing policy (learning from experience).
References
Atkinson, R, Flint, J. (2004). Fortress UK? Gated Communities, the Spatial Revolt of the Elites and Time - Space Trajectories of Segregation, Housing Studies 19.6, 875–892. doi: 10.1080/0267303042000293982.
Bagaeen, S. & Uduku, O. (Eds., 2015). Beyond Gated Communities, London, New York: Earthscan by Routledge.
Bagaeen, S. (2015). Beyond Gated Communities – Urban Gating, soft Boundaries and Networks of Influence and Affluence. In: Bagaeen, S. & Uduku, O. (еds.) Beyond Gated Communities (9–25). London, New York: Earthscan by Routledge.
Bagaeen, S. & Uduku, O. (Eds.). (2010). Gated Communities – Social Sustainability in Contemporary and Historical Gated Developments. London and Washington DC: Earthscan.
Bridge, G., Butler, T., Le Gales, P. (2014). Power Relations and Social Mix in Metropolitan Neighbourhoods in North America and Europe: Moving Beyond Gentrification? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Vol. 38.4, July 2014, 1133–41. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12125.
Butler, Tim (2007). Re-urbanizing London Docklands: Gentrification, Suburbanization or New Urbanism? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Vol. 31.4, 759–781. doi: 10.111/j.1468-2427.2007.00758.x.
Dupuis, A., & Dixon J. (2010). Barriers and Boundaries: An Exploration of Gatedness in New Zealand. In Bagaeen S. & Uduku O, (Eds.). Gated Communities (115-129). London, Washington DC: Earthscan.
Đorđević, S. (1998). Entrepreneurial City Management – City Manager Model. Beograd: Fakultet političkih nauka Univerziteta u Beogradu, Čigoja štampa. [In Serbian]
Glasze, G. (2005). Some Reflections on the Economic and Political Organisation of Private Neighbourhoods, Housing Studies, 20/2, 221-233. doi: 10.1080/026730303042000331745
Glasze, G., Webster, C. & Frantz, K. (Eds). (2006). Private Cities: Global and Local Perspectives, London: Routledge & Taylor and Francis.
Grant, J., Mittelsteadt, L. (2004). Types of Gated Communities, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 31, 913–930. doi: 10.1068/b3165.
Janoschka, M. & Salinas, L. (2013). Gentrification in Spain and Latin America – A Critical Dialogue, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 38(4), p. 1234–1265. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12030.
/>Kenna, T., Linehan, D., Brady, W., Hall, J. (2015). Gating in urban Ireland. In: Samer Bagaeen, Ola Uduku, Beyond Gated Communities (Eds.) London, New York: Earthscan by Routledge.
Lefebvre, H. (1996). Writings on Cities. Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing.
Le Goix, R., & Callen, D., (2010). Production and Social Sustainability of Private Enclaves in Suburban Landscapes – French and US Long Term Emergence of Gated Communities and Private Streets. In: Bagaeen, S. & Uduku, O. (Eds.). Gated Communities. (93-114). London, Washington DC: Earthscan.
Lees, L., Shin, N. B., Lopez-Morales, E. (2016). Planetary Gentrification. Malden, MA, USA: Polity Press.
Lee, L., Butler, T. (2006). Super-gentrification in Barnsbury, London – Globalization and Gentrifying Elites at the Neighbourhood Level, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS31 467-487 2006, Royal Geographical Society, Journal compilation, pp. 467–487. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2006.00220.x.
/>Low, S. (2003). Behind the Gates: Life, Security and the Pursuit of Happiness in Fortress America, New York, NY: Routledge.
McKenzie, E. (2006). The Dynamics of Privatopia: Private Residential Governance in the USA. In: Glasze, G., Webster, C., & Frantz, K. (Eds.). Private Cities: Global and Local Perspectives. (142–152). London: Routledge & Taylor and Francis.
MacLeod, G. (2014). Walling the City. In: Paddison Ronan & McCann, Eugen (Eds.), Cities and Social Change – Encounters with Contemporary Urbanism (130–147). Los Angeles, London: Sage.
Neil, S. (1996). The New Urban Frontier – Gentrification and Revanchist City, London, UK: Routledge.
Neil, S. & Williams, P. (Eds.). (2007). Gentrification of the City. New York, NY: Routledge.
Nyong`o, T. (2012).The Scene of Occupation, TDR: The Drama Review, Vol. 56, No. 4: 136–149. doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/DRAM_a_00219.
/>Odih, P. (2013). Visual Media and Culture of ‘Occupy’. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Peterson, P. (Ed.) (1985). The New Urban Reality. New York: Brookings Institution Press.
Renau, L. R. & Martin, L. L. (2015). Peterson, P. (Ed). (1985). The New Urban Reality – the Dark Side of a Trendy Neighbourhood: Gentrification and Dispossession in Russafa, the “Valencian Soho.” In: Conflict in the City – Contested Urban Spaces and Local Democracy (147–163). Berlin: JOVIS Verlag GmbH.
Robinson, S. P. (2015). Gated Communities in a Changing Geopolitical Landscape – an Exploratory Genealogy of Occupy London. In: Bagaeen, S. & Uduku, O. (Eds.). Gated Communities. (26–48). London, Washington DC: Earthscan.
Sassen, S. (2002). The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton University Press.
Ward, K. (2014). Splintered Governance: Urban Politics in the Twenty-First Century. In: Davidson Mark & Martin Deborah. Urban Politics – Critical Approaches. London: Sage.