Three decades of sustainable development – emergence, domination, weaknesses and perspective
Abstract
The paper is aimed to perceive critically the three-decade concept of sustainable development at several levels, and, accordingly, it is divided into three parts. The first one is dedicated to the specific features of the emergence of this concept in the initial period 1983-1992 and the first developmental period 1992-2000. A special emphasis is laid on the theoretical distinction and domination of the concept of sustainable development in relation to the then existing forms, such as ecological modernization. The second part of the paper continues the identification of the developmental stages within the scope of the Millennium Goals 2000–2015, with a central critical focus on the achieved results. The third part of the paper covers the current stage of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) envisaged for the period 2015–2030, and particularly points to the quantitative faults and inconsistencies in the methodology of evaluation, as well as measurement of the fulfilment of the goals themselves. The analytical apparatus points ty qualitative and quantitative methods to the chronically faulty set of instruments of sustainable development due to which the ecological component as the first among the equal is derogated to the level of the least importance, which is contrary to the founding principles of this concept.
References
Attaran, A. (2005). An Immeasurable Crisis? A Criticism of the Millennium Development Goals and Why They Cannot Be Measured. PLoS Medicine,2(10): e318. DOI: 10.1371/ journal.pmed.0020318
Baker, S. (2007). Sustainable development as symbolic commitment: Declaratory poli-tics and the seductive appeal of ecological modernisation in the European Union. Environmental Politics 16 (2), 297-317. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010701211874
/>Blowers, A. (1998). Power, participation and partnership. In: P. Glasbergen (Ed.) Co-operative Environmental Governance: Public – Private Agreements as a Policy Strategy,. Kluwer Academic Publishers
Dias, C., Seixas. P, & Lobner, N. (2020). Sustainable Development and Ecological Modernization: Boundary Discourses between “Strong” and “Weak” Approaches, Journal of Sustainable Development 13 (4), 268-278. DOI:10.5539/jsd.v13n4p268
Dryzek, S. J. (2005). The Politics of the Earth: Environmental Discourses. London: Oxford University Press.
Elliott, A. J. (2006). An Introduction to Sustainable Development, 3rd edition. London: Routledge
Fudge, C & Rowe, J. (2001). Ecological Modernisation as a Framework for Sustainable Development: A Case Study in Sweden. Environment and Planning 33(9), 1527–1546. https://doi.org/10.1068/a33153
/>General Assembly of the UN. (2000). United Nations Millennium Declaration, UN, New York, resolution 55/2. Available at https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/popu-lation/migration/generalassembly/docs/globalcompact/A_RES_55_2.pdf
/>General Assembly of the UN. (2015) Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, United Nations, New York. Available at: https://documents-dds-ny.un-.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N15/291/89/PDF/N1529189.pdf?OpenElement
/>Gibbs, D. (2015). MDG Failure, Borgen Project. Available at https://borgenproject.org/ mdg-failures/
Hickel, J. (2020). The World’s Sustainable Development Goals Aren’t Sustainable. Foreign policy, September.
IAEG – SDGs. (2017). Global indicator framework for the Sustainable Development Goals and targets of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, New York Available at https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/indicators/Global%20Indicator%20Framework%20 after%202021%20refinement_Eng.pdf
Langhelle, O. (2000). Why ecological modernization and sustainable development should not be conflated. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 2 (4), 303-322. https:// doi.org/10.1080/714038563
Lugaresi, N. (2014). The Unbearable Tiredness of Sustainable Development. In: Robert Percival, et al. Global Environmental Law at a Crossroads. Edward Elgar Publishing
Marković, D. Ž. (2015). Social Ecology, 6th edition, Beograd: Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva. [In Serbian]
Milenković, D. (2006). Environmental protection law: With elements of Introduction to law. Beograd: Viša politehnička škola. [In Serbian]
Mohammed, A. Al-Sharafi & Nishikant, C. (2019). “Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) The Achievement and Failure: A Comparative Presentation Between Yemen and India in the Light of the Development Sectors’ Indicators, Social Sci Journal, Punjab, Vol 5.
Nadić, D. (2012). Essays from political ecology. Beograd: Čigoja [In Serbian]
OECD. (1996). Development Assistance Committee, Shaping the 21st Century: The Contribution of Development Co-operation. Paris. Available at https://www.oecd.org/ dac/2508761.pdf
UN. (2000). Millennium goals document, New York. Available at https://www.ndi.org/sites/ default/files/Handout%207%20-%20Millennium%20Development%20Goals.pdf
UN. (2015). The Millennium Development Goals Report, United Nations, New York. Available at: https://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/2015_MDG_Report/pdf/MDG%20 2015%20rev%20(July%201).pdf
UN. (2021). The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2021, New York. Available at https:// unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2021/The-Sustainable-Development-Goals-Report-2021. pdf
UNDP. (2021) Sustainable Development Goals. Serbia. Available at https://www.undp.org/ sr/serbia/ciljevi-odr%C5%BEivog-razvoja
Vujić, M. (2022). Environmental position in socio-political forms of the Western civilization development (doctoral dissertation). Beograd, Fakultet političkih nauka. Available at https://nardus.mpn.gov.rs/handle/123456789/20822 [In Serbian]
WCED. (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. New York. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/ documents/5987our-common-future.pdf
www.nationalgeographic.rs
www.worldpopulationreview.com
www.balkangreenenergynews.com
www.borgenproject.org
www.britannica.com
www.carbonbrief.org
www.dashboards.sdgindex.org
www.data.footprintnetwork.org
www.economist.com
www.politika.rs
www.statista.com
www.un.org