Ontological security and collective identity through the prism of strategic culture on the example of Kosovo and Metohija
Abstract
The paper theoretically investigates the phenomena of ontological security and collective identity through the prism of strategic culture, with an empirical elaboration of the case study of Kosovo and Metohija. The authors supplement the realistic understanding of security with a social-constructivist perspective, emphasizing the influence of values, ideas, perceptions and culture in general in the shaping of collective identity, which is closely related to the subjective sense of security. The main hypothesis is that the solidity of the collective identity survives regardless of external pressures and reshaping tendencies because its survival is perceived as an inseparable essence of ontological security. The authors conclude that the strength of collective identity in certain situations overcomes the problems of collapsed institutions and the absence of actors who advocate the basic values of that identity. Kosovo and Metohija is more than a material part of the territory, strongly building the foundations of collective identity. An individual who feels a sense of belonging to such a collective identity will almost instinctively reject any solution which affects that identity, so he will perceive an attack on those values, no matter how intense, as a feeling of personal insecurity.
References
Ahel, I. (2018). Why Serbia Has Lost Kosovo. Danas. Available at: https://www.danas.rs/vesti/drustvo/zasto-je-srbija-izgubila-kosovo/. Accessed August 20, 2023. [In Serbian]
Antonić, S. (2016). Disassembly of Culture. Beograd: Catena Mundi. [In Serbian]
Antonić, S. (2023). Serbian and Russian Autochauvinism. RT Balkan. Available at:https://rt.rs/opinion/slobodan-antonic-politikolog/46410-slobodan-antonic-autosovinizam/. Accessed on August 29, 2023. [In Serbian]
Baldwin, D. (1997). The Concept of Security. Review of International Studies, 23 (1), 5–26.
Blagojević, V. (2019). Strategic Culture and National Security. Zbornik Matice srpske za društvene nauke, LXX (170), 163–178. https: doi.org/10.2298/ZMSDN1970163B [In Serbian]
Brubaker, R., Cooper, F. (2000). Beyond ‘identity’. Theory and Society, 29, 1–47.
Buzan, B. (1991). People, States & Fear, an Agenda for International Security Studies in the Post-cold War Era. London: Pearson Education Limited.
Đurić, J. (2016). Collective Identity in Serbia Today. Srpska politička misao, 4/2016, 31–50. https://doi.org/10.22182/spm.5442016.2 [In Serbian]
Ejdus, F. (2017). Critical Situations, Fundamental Questions and Ontological Insecurity in World Politics. Journal of International Relations and Development, 21 (4), 883–908.
European Commission (2018). A credible enlargement perspective for and enhanced EU engagement with the Western Balkans – Six new flagship initiatives to support the transformation of the Western Balkans. Brussels: EU Publication Office. Available at: https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2775/902991. Accessed on August 27, 2023.
Franco-Zamudio, J., Dorton, H. (2014). Collective Identity. In: Thomas Teo (ed.). Encyclopaedia of Critical Psychology. New York: Springer, 256–259.
Gavrov, S. N. (2012). Political Culture. In: Y. M. Reznik (ed.). Sociocultural Anthropology: History, Theory and Methodology: Encyclopaedic Dictionary. M. Kirov: Akademicheskiy proekt, Kultura, Konstanta, 733–740. [In Russian]
Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity. Self and society in the late modern age. New York: Polity Press.
Gumilev, L. N. (2005). Ethnogenesis and the Biosphere of Earth. Podgorica: CID. [In Serbian]
Gurney, C. (2021). Ontological security. A term of contradictions. Housing Studies Association. Available at: https://www.housing-studies-association.org/articles/318-ontological-se-curity-a-term-of-contradictions. Accessed on August 8, 2023.
Hopf, T. (1998). The promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory. International Security, 23 (1), 171–200.
House of Win (2018). Electoral behaviour of citizens in the Republic of Serbia and ex-amination of attitudes regarding the resolution of the Kosovo and Metohija issue. Available at: https://houseofwin.net/ispitivanje-javnog-mnjenja-kosovo.php. Accessed on August 15, 2023. [In Serbian]
Kim, J. (2009). Cultural Dimension of Strategy and Policy. Carlisle Barracks (Pennsylvania): Strategic Studies Institute – U.S. Army War College Press.
Laing, R. D. (2001). The Divided Self – An Existential Study in Sanity and Madness. New York: Routledge.
Lompar, M. (2020). The Spirit of Self-Denial. Beograd: Catena Mundi. [In Serbian]
Mastilović Jasnić, I. (2023). What do you feel when I tell you ’Serbia’? Research into the citizens’ feelings at the mention of the words ’power’, ’opposition’, ’Kosovo’, ’Russia’. Blic. Available at: https://www.blic.rs/vesti/politika/istrazivanje-o-osecanjima-gra-dana-na-pomen-reci-vlast-opozicija-kosovo-rusija/ex5j31m. Accessed on August 12, 2023.[In Serbian]
Miljković Matić, J. (2007). On ethnic and civil component of the concept of nation. Politička revija, 14 (2–4), 871–879. [In Serbian]
Mirović, D. (2021). Washington Agreement 2020: Kosovo – Jerusalem. Beograd: Catena Mundi. [In Serbian]
Mitzen, J. (2006). Ontological Security in World Politics: State Identity and the Security Dilemma. European Journal of International Relations, 12 (3), 341–370.
Parezanović, M., Željski, R. (2019). The Role of Propaganda Activities in Political Upheavals. Srpska politička misao, 3/2019, 409–426. https://doi.org/10.22182/spm.6532019.18 [In Serbian]
Proroković, D. (2022). Division of Kosovo and Metohija: Reality or Illusion. Vojno delo, 74(1), 55–74. DOI: 10.5937/vojdelo2202055P [In Serbian]
Vračar, M., Stanojević, G. (2019). Strategic Culture of Serbia and the Concept of Total Defence. Vojno delo, 71 (8), 294–315. DOI: 10.5937/vojdelo1908294V [In Serbian]
Wolfers, A. (1952). National Security as an Ambiguous Symbol. Political Science Quarterly, 67 (4), 481–502.
Woodward, K. (2002). Understanding identity. New York: Oxford University Press.