Digital dimension of entrepreneurship as a significant dimension of social security
Abstract
Digital entrepreneurship represents an important component of economic development. This paper tries to emphasize the importance of the factors that belong to the digital dimension of the entrepreneurial ecosystem according to the EIDES methodology, in the early phase of the company’s life cycle, from the area of human capital. The goal is to point out the role of these factors in improving economic stability and the ability of individuals to effectively respond to the challenges and opportunities of the modern digital environment. Understanding the importance of this dimension becomes crucial when defining policies and strategies aimed at improving the quality of life of individuals and the social community as a whole, ensuring fair access to economic and professional opportunities of importance for social security in the 21st century.
References
Abdullah, O. K. (2019). Exploring the role of safety culture factors towards safety behav-iour in small-medium enterprise. Scholarly Journal, 23 (3). Available at: https://www.proquest.com/openview/d4b9699e9761c223c733c11907aa3405/1?pq-origsite=g-scholar&cbl=29727.
Acquah, A. N. (2021). Literature review on theories motivation. EPRA International Journal of Economic and Business Review – Peer Reviewed Journal, 9 (5), 25–30. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Alex-Acquah/publication/351790886_LITERATURE_REVIEW_ON_THEORIES_MOTIVATION/links/63541c758d4484154a23ede0/LITERATURE-REVIEW-ON-THEORIES-MOTIVATION.pdf.
Autio, E., Szerb, L., Komlosi, E., Tiszberger, M. (2018). EIDES 2018: The European Index of digital entrepreneurship systems. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
Berger, E. B. (2021). Digital or not – The future of entrepreneurship and innovation: Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Business Research, 125, 436–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.12.020.
Bulturbayevich, M. (2022). In private entrepreneurship employee incentives issues. Asia Pacific journal of marketing and management review, 11 (4). Available at: http://gejournal.net/index.php/APJMMR/article/view/421.
Elia, G., Margherita, A., Passiante, G. (2020). Digital entrepreneurship ecosystem: How digital technologies and collective intelligence are reshaping the entrepreneurial pro-cess. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 150, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119791.
Individuals who have basic or above basic overall digital skills. Retrieved from Eurostat: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/tepsr_sp410/default/table?lang=en.
Kallinikos, J. A. (2013). The ambivalent ontology of digital artifacts. MIS Q, 37 (2), 357–370. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/43825913.
Latinović, L., Stojić, N., Latinović, J. (2020). Important factors in the revival of the biodiesel industry in Serbia – progress or pitfall?. Serbian Journal of Engineering Management, 5 (2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.5937/SJEM2002001L.
Lyytinen, J. Y. (2016). Digital product innovation within four classes of innovation networks. Inf. Syst. J., 26 (1), 47–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12093.
Markus, M., Loebbecke, C. (2013). Commoditized digital processes and business commu-nity platforms: new opportunities and challenges for digital business strategies. MIS Quart, 37 (2), 649–653. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/43825930.
Nambisan, S., Lyytinen, K., Majchrzak, A., Song, M. (2017). Digital innovation manage-ment: reinventing innovation management in a digital world. MIS Q, 41 (1), 223–238.
Raut, J., Mitrović Veljković, S., Melović, B., Vidicki, P. (2022) . The Influence of the Entrepreneurial Ecosystem on the Initiation and Development of Innovation Processes. Serbian Journal of Engineering Management, 7 (2), 8–13. Available at: https://fim.edu.rs/wp-content/uploads/Serbian-Journal-of-Engineering-Management-Vol7-No-2-2022.pdf.
Seeley, E. (1992). Human needs and consumer economics: the implications of Maslow’s theory of motivation for consumer expenditure patterns. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 21 (4), 303–324. Available at: http://www.raijmr.com/ijrsml/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/IJRSML_2019_vol07_issue_06_Eng_09.pdf.
Shen, Z. L. (2015). Time and information technology in teams: a review of empirical research and future research directions. European Journal of Information Systems, 24, 492–518. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/ejis.2014.8.
Stam, E. (2015) . Entrepreneurial ecosystem and regional policy: a sympathetic critique. European planning studies, 25(9), 1759–1769. Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09654313.2015.1061484.
Trivedi, A. (2019). Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs – Theory of Human Motivation. International Journal of Research in all Subjects in Multi Languages, 7(6), 38–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/1053-5357(92)90002-O
Usage ICT – households (2022, 9 23). Available at: Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia, https://www.stat.gov.rs/en-us/oblasti/upotreba-ikt/upotreba-ikt-domacinstva/.
Zaheer, H. B. (2019). Digital entrepreneurship: An interdisciplinary structured literature review and research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 148, 1–20. Available at: https://fardapaper.ir/mohavaha/uploads/2021/06/Fardapaper-Digital-entrepreneurship-An-interdisciplinary-structured-literature-review-and-research-agenda.pdf.
Yoo, Y. H. (2010). Research commentary – the new organizing logic of digital innovation: an agenda for information systems research. Inf. Syst. Res., 21(4), 724–735. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1100.0322.