The application of artificial intelligence in the context of the educational system in Serbia, with a special focus on religious education

Keywords: artificial intelligence, education, Serbia, religious education

Abstract


The presence and increasing influence of artificial intelligence (AI) in modern society and its already acknowledged potential for transforming educational practice demand a thorough and systematic study of the implications of its use in the entire educational system, aa well as in the context of certain school subjects and curricula. This paper covers the theoretical and empirical frameworks for analyzing positive and negative aspects of AI integration into education, with a special focus on religious education. In the theoretical segment, AI possibilities and challenges are analyzed in the context of today’s teaching process, while the empirical part of the research is focused on analyzing the aspects of AI application in the organization of the teaching process for the optional subject Religious Education. By identifying advantages and challenges in the application of this technology, AI possibilities are considered in detail as an auxiliary instrument for preparing Religious Education lessons in the primary school. For that purpose, the answers generated by ChatGPT application were compared with the subject teacher’s experience about the lesson preparation, whereas apart from content overlapping, deviation was also observed in the quality of certain generated answers. Through a critical review of the current situation in AI use in education, this paper offers a general estimate of the current situation, recognizing the importance of further development and adaptation of pedagogical practices to AI possibilities.

References

Adiguzel, T., Kaya, M. H., Cansu, F. K. (2023). Revolutionizing education with AI: Exploring the transformative potential of ChatGPT. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15 (3), ep429. doi:10.30935/cedtech/13152

Amrutha, N. (2023). An Analysis of Artificial Intelligence in Education. International Journal for Research Trends and Innovation, 8 (5), 206–208. Available at: https://www. ijrti.org/papers/IJRTI2305030.pdf

Baidoo-Anu, D., Owusu Ansah, L. (2023). Education in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI): Understanding the Potential Benefits of ChatGPT in Promoting Teaching and Learning. SSRN. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4337484

Bazić, Ј., Sekulić, B. (2023). Education in coordinates of industry 4.0 and industry 5.0, Sociološki pregled, 57 (2), 610–637. doi: 10.5937/socpreg57-42977

Bhutoria, A. (2022). Personalized education and Artificial Intelligence in the United States, China, and India: A systematic review using a Human-In-The-Loop model. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. caeai.2022.100068

Brekke, I., Alecu, A., Ugreninov, E., Surén, P., Evensen, M. (2023). Educational achievement among children with a disability: do parental resources compensate for disadvantage?. SSM – Population Health, 23, 101465, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2023.101465

Castañeda, L., Selwyn, N. (2018). More than tools? Making sense of the ongoing digitiza- tions of higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15, 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0109-y

Chen, L., Chen, P., Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264-75278. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510

Cumming, G., McDougall, A. (2000). Mainstreaming AIED into education?. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 11, 197–207. Available at: https://telearn. hal.science/hal-00197331/document

Flogie, A., Aberšek, B. (2019). The Impact of Innovative ICT Education and AI on the Pedagogical Paradigm. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Government of the RS (2019). Strategy for the development of artificial intelligence in the Republic of Serbia for the period 2020–2025. Službeni glasnik RS, 96/2019. [In Serbian]

Government of the RS (2020). Action plan for the period 2020–2022 for the implementation of the Artificial Intelligence Development Strategy in the Republic of Serbia for the period 2020–2025. Službeni glasnik RS, 81/2020. [In Serbian]

Government of the RS (2023). Conclusion on the adoption of the Ethical Guidelines for the development, application and use of reliable and responsible artificial intelligence. Službeni glasnik RS, 23/2023. [In Serbian]

Hampton, K. N., Fernandez, L., Robertson, C. T., Bauer, J. M. (2020). Broadband and Student Performance Gaps. Quello Center, Michigan State University. https://doi. org/10.25335/BZGY-3V91

Hohenstein, J., Kizilcec. R. F., DiFranzo, D., Aghajari, Z., Mieczkowski, H., Levy, K., Naaman, M., Hancock, J., Jung, M. F. (2023). Artificial intelligence in communication impacts language and social relationships. Sci Rep, 13 (1), 5487. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023- 30938-9. Erratum in: Sci Rep, 13 (1), 16616 (2023). doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-30938-9

Holmes, W., Bialik, M., Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial Intelligence in Education: Promises and Implications for Teaching and Learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.

Hughes, S., Bae, M. (2023). Vectara Hallucination Leaderboard [Data set]. Available at: https://github.com/vectara/hallucination-leaderboard

Jauhiainen, J. S., Guerra, A. G. (2023). Generative AI and ChatGPT in School Children’s Education: Evidence from a School Lesson. Sustainability, 15, 14025. https://doi. org/10.3390/su151814025

Johnson, T. L., Johnson, N. N. (2023, May 18). Police Facial Recognition Technology Can’t Tell Black People Apart. Scientific American, Available at: https://www.scientificamer- ican.com/article/police-facial-recognition-technology-cant-tell-black-people-apart/

Kadijevich, Dj. M., Masliković, D., Tomić, B. M. (2022). Familiarity with state regulations regarding access to information for persons with disabilities in Serbia. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 69 (5), 1715–1725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2020.106309

Kooli, C. (2023). Chatbots in Education and Research: A Critical Examination of Ethical Implications and Solutions. Sustainability, 15 (7), 5614. https://doi.org/10.3390/ su15075614

Limna, P., Jakwatanatham, S., Siripipattanakul, S., Kaewpuang, P., Sriboonruang, P. (2022). A Review of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Education during the Digital Era. Advance Knowledge for Executives, 1 (1), 1–9, 2022. Available at: https://deliverypdf.ssrn.com/ delivery.php

Marković, M. M. (2014). Persons with disabilities in Serbia. Beograd: Republički zavod za statistiku. Available at: https://pod2.stat.gov.rs/ObjavljenePublikacije/Popis2011/ invaliditet.pdf [In Serbian]

Masliković, D., Tomić, B. M., Tomić, M. (2023). Innovative tools for protection and pres- entation of cultural heritage. In: Vizantijsko-slovenska čtenija 6. Niš: Međunarodni centar za pravoslavne studije, Centar za vizantijsko-slovenske studije, Centar za crkvene studije, 525–532. [In Serbian]

Pashentsev, E. N., Blekanov, I. S., Chernobrivchenko, A. (2023). Personal data protection in Russia and the risks of malicious use of artificial intelligence technologies: new challenges to psychological security. Sociološki pregled, 57 (2), 471–490. doi: 10.5937/ socpreg57-42986

Photopoulos, P., Tsonos, C., Stavrakas, I., Triantis, D. (2023). Remote and In-Person Learning: Utility Versus Social Experience. SN Comput Sci., 4 (2), 116. doi: 10.1007/ s42979-022-01539-6

Radovanović, N., Tomić, B. M., Vasojević, N. (2022). Advantages and disadvantages of online teaching with reference to religious education. In: Vizantijsko-slovenska čtenija 5. Niš: Centar za vizantijsko-slovenske studije Univerziteta u Nišu, Međunarodni centar za pravoslavne studije, Centar za crkvene studije, 247–254. [In Serbian]

Schonert-Reichl, K. A. (2017). Social and Emotional Learning and Teachers, Future of Children, 27 (1), 137–155. Available at: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1145076.pdf

Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., Suthers, D. (2014). Computer-supported collaborative learning. In: R. K. Sawyer (ed.). The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (479–500). New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519526.029

Tomić, B. M., Milovanović, M., Medić-Simić, G. (2023). Deduction in Education: The Case of Serbia. In: P. Quaresma, Z. Kovács (eds.). 14th International Conference on Automated Deduction in Geometry Book of Abstracts, 8. Available at: https://www. adg2023.matf.bg.ac.rs/downloads/bookOfAbstractsADG2023.pdf

UNESCO (2016). Education 2030: Incheon Declaration and Framework for Action for the implementation of Sustainable Development Goal 4: Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all. UNESCO. Available at: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000245656/PDF/245656eng.pdf.multi

UNESCO (2023). Ministerial Roundtable on Generative AI in Education. UNESCO. Available at: https://articles.unesco.org/sites/default/files/medias/fichiers/2023/05/Agenda%20 Ministerial%20Roundtable%20on%20GAI%20in%20Education%20ENG.pdf

Winnard, N. (2024, Jan 17). The Rise of Deepfakes in Schools. The International Educator. Available at: https://www.tieonline.com/article/3632/the-rise-of-deepfakes-in-schools

Woolf, B. (1988). Intelligent tutoring systems: A survey. In: Exploring Artificial Intelligence (1–43). Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.

Published
2024/07/11
Section
Original scientific paper