Human enhancement and morality: some theoretical doubts

Nenad Cekić

doi:10.5937/socpreg58-51894

Nenad N. Cekić University of Belgrade, Faculty of Philosophy, Department of Philosophy, Belgrade (Serbia) https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7823-3531

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/socpreg58-51894

Keywords: ethics, neuroethics, moral enhancement, moral brain, models

Abstract

The author tackles the critical ethical ideas accompanying the idea that man can be “morally enhanced” by influencing the “moral brain”. Analyzing the primary approach of contemporary neuroethicists, the author notes that the idea of improvement mainly omits normative-ethical and metaethical elements, without which a clear idea of what can be considered “moral enhancement” is not possible. The author also draws attention to the over-reliance on technological procedures in assessing the determination and scope of moral enhancement. At the end of the paper, the author analyzes two models of the functioning of the “moral brain”. These two models are taken from pop culture. One is the model of the dual personality of Dr. Jekyll / Mr. Hyde, taken from literature and film adaptations. The second is the famous computer with personality, HAL 9000 from the renowned movie 2001: A Space Odyssey.

References

Arras, J. (2016). Theory and Bioethics. In: Zalta, E. N. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2016 Edition), Available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2016/entries/theory-bioethics/

Bykvist, K. (2010). Utilitarianism: A Guide for the Perplexed. London: Continuum.

Cekić, N. (2013). Metaethics. Novi Sad: Akademska knjiga. [In Serbian]

Crockett, M. (2008). Your Inner Jekyll and Hyde. Available at: http://www.youramazingbrain.org.uk/2008_Reseacher_runner-up_Molly_Crockett.pdf

Douglas, T. (2013). Moral Enhancement Via Direct Emotion Modulation: A Reply to John Harris. Bioethics 27 (3), 1160–1188.

Fisher A. (2014). Metaethics: An Introduction. Durham: Acumen.

Gutmann, A., Thompson, D. (1996). Democracy and Disagreement, Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.

Hare, R. M. (1963). Freedom and Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Harris, J. (2011). Moral Enhancement and Freedom. Bioethics 25 (2), 102–111, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01854.x

Liao, M. S. (2016). Morality and Neuroscience. In: Liao, MS (ed.). Moral Brains. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–2.

Magelssen, M., Reidar P., Reidun F. (2016). Four Roles of Ethical Theory in Clinical Ethics Consultation, The American Journal of Bioethics, 16 (9), 26–33, DOI:10.1080/15265161.2016.1196254.

Moore, G. E. [1903] 1988. Principia Ethica. Prometheus: Amherst.

Persson, I., Savulescu, J. (2008). The Perils of Cognitive Enhancement and the Urgent Imperative to Enhance the Moral Character of Humanity, Journal of Applied Philosophy, 25 (3), 162–177, DOI:10.1111/j.1468-5930.2008.00410.x

Persson, I. and Savulescu J. (2012). Unfit for the Future: The Need for Moral Enhancement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Prinz, J. (2016). Sentimentalism and the Moral Brain. In: M. S. Liao (ed.), 45–73.

Safire, V. (2002). Introduction: Visions for A New Field Of “Neuroethics”. In: Neuroethics: mapping the field, Conference proceedings, San Franscisco: DANA Press. Available at: https://dana.org/app/uploads/2023/09/neuroethics-mapping-the-field.pdf

Satpute, A. B., Shu, J., Weber, J., Roy M., Ochsner K. (2013). The Functional Neural Architecture of Self- Reports of Affective Experience. Biological Psychiatry 73, 631– 638, DOI:10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.10.001

Savulescu, J. (2009). Unfit for Life: genetically Enhance Humanity or Face Extinction. Available at: http://humanityplus.org/genetically-enhance-humanity-or-face-extinction/2009 Singer, P. (2011). Practical Ethics 3rd Edition, Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.

Wiseman, H. (2016). The Myth of the Moral Brain. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.