Towards a global geopolitical novum – with or without World War until a change of order?

Keywords: geopolitical transition, era of wars, non-polarity, integration blocs, incoherence of principles

Abstract


The world is undergoing a turbulent transition between different orders, which is manifested through political, military, technological, economic, religious, propaganda, and other confrontations. The participants in the said conflicts are actors who are striving to perpetuate a privileged status quo, on the one hand, and rising powers with aspirations to change the system in which their position is inferior, on the other. Although armed conflicts may at first glance have a proxy character, a world war is possible as multiple simultaneous regional wars. The author argues that the outcomes of such wars are already yielding a geopolitical, i.e., comprehensive reshaping of the world. Absolute domination of the US during the “unipolar moment” ceased to exist a long while ago, whereas a multipolar system in its true sense has not yet been fully established. The current historical-geopolitical situation would be the most accurately defined as a process of multipolarisation, that is, a process of structuring a polycentric world. For the time being, it is impossible to say what this polycentricity will look like, what the alignment of powers will be on the scale of global power, and whether they will incline towards at least a passable balance of (neo) bipolarity. Additionally, there is another “end of history”(?) on the horizon, with an imminent shifting of the earlier unipolarity towards a new one – Pax Americana will be followed by an attempt to establish Pax Sinica. Therefore, general thinking does not go beyond the set patterns of coordinates of some form of polarity. Nevertheless, there is ample indication that there is an ongoing shifting towards a new geopolitical novum – mosaic-like structure of building blocks whose principles of integration will be fragmented, with fluid borders, while connections will be flexible.

References

Brzezinski, Z. (1997). Geostrategy for Eurasia. Foreign Affairs, 76 (5), 50–64. Available at: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/asia/1997-09-01/geostrategy-eurasia

Brzezinski, Z. (2001). The Grand Chessboard. Podgorica: CID; Banja Luka: Romanov. [In Serbian]

Brzezinski, Z. (2004). American Choice: Global Domination or Global Leadership. Zagreb: Politička kultura; Podgorica: CID. [In Croatian]

Huntington, S. (1996). The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Huntington S. (1999). The Lonely Superpower. Foreign Affairs, 78 (2), 35–49. Available at: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/1999-03-01/lonely-superpower

Krivokapić, B. (2010). Encyclopedic Dictionary of International Law and International Relations. Beograd: Službeni glasnik. [In Serbian]

Mackinder, H. J. (1996). Democratic Ideals and Reality. Washington DC: National Defense University Press.

Ramonet, I. (1998). Geopolitics of chaos. Beograd: Institut za geopolitičke studije. [In Serbian]

Stepić, M. (2016). Geopolitics: Ideas, Theories, Conceptions. Beograd: Institut za političke studije. [In Serbian]

Stepić, M. (2017a). From (Neo)classical to Postmodern Geopolitical Postulates. In: M. Stepić (ed.). The World and New Geopolitical Paradigms, 13–36. Beograd: Institut za političke studije. [In Serbian]

Stepić, M. (2017b). Islamic Heartland. Srpska politička misao. № 1/2017, 55, 57–80. https://doi.org/10.22182/spm.5512017.3 [In Serbian]

Stepić, M. (2020). New Serbian integration challenge: Russian and/or Chinese Eurasianism. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18485/iipe_ru_sr.2020.ch12 In: B. Stojanović, E. Ponomareva (eds.). Russia and Serbia in the Contemporary World: bilateral relations and opportunities (187–200). Beograd: Institut za međunarodnu politiku i privredu.

Stepić, M. (2023). Geopolitical Glossary of the Balkans. Beograd: Catena mundi. [In Serbian]

Stepić, M. (2024). At the Geopolitical Crossroads: Europe, Quo Vadis? In: B. Forca & D. Sekulović (eds.). Europe at the Crossroads – Security Analytics (27–51). Beograd: Fakultet za poslovne studije i pravo Univerziteta „Union – Nikola Tesla”. [In Serbian]

Stepić, M. (2025a). Košare as a Geopolitical and Geoidentity Paradigm. Politička revija, № 2/2025, 135–157, DOI: 10.5937/pr84-57093. [In Serbian]

Stepić, M. (2025b, February 6). Trump wants his own “Siberia”. Available at: https://rt.rs/opinion/milomir-stepic/128955-tramp-hoce-svoj-sibir/ [In Serbian]

Stepić, M., Zarić, I. (2016). Serbia and Geopolitical (non)Complementarity of the Danube Strategy and the New Silk Road. In: D. Dimitrijević (ed.). Danube and the New Silk Road (447–466). Beograd: Institut za međunarodnu politiku i privredu.

UCDP (Uppsala Conflict Data Program) (2025). Available at: https://ucdp.uu.se/year/2024

Published
2026/05/08
Section
Original scientific paper