Oblici polarnosti u neorealizmu i svetsko-sistemskoj teoriji
Sažetak
Savremene svetske odnose karakteriše razgradnja američke jednopolarnosti i haotičnost u međunarodnim odnosima. Ova promena u sferi geopolitike nesumnjivo je povezana i sa restrukturiranjem svetskog kapitalističkog sistema u kojem SAD gube status hegemona, centralni položaj zapadnih zemalja postaje upitan, a sve veći broj poluperifernih regija po svojim ekonomskim i političkim karakteristikama približava se centru. Usled navedenog, na savremeno doba može se gledati kao na eru radikalne transformacije geopolitičkih obrazaca zbog čega analiza osnovnih karakteristika jedno-, bi- i multipolarnosti dobija na značaju. Detaljna analiza neorealizma kao teorije zaslužne za razvitak ovih koncepata neophodna je za što adekvatnije razumevanje različitih oblika polarnosti. Takođe, teorijski je značajno upoređivanje neorealističkog viđenja polarnosti sa svetsko-sistemskim shvatanjem hegemonije kako bi se adekvatno proučila distribucija moći u međunarodnom poretku država. Osnovni cilj ovog rada je da analizom neorealističkog i svetsko-sistemskog pogleda na polarnost stvori osnove za ispitivanje današnjeg dominantnog oblika polarnosti i da pretpostavi kakav oblik polarnosti će biti dominantan u 21. veku.
Reference
Antonić, S. (1995). Challenges of Historical Sociology. Beograd: Institut za političke studije.[In Serbian]
Army Technology (2012). Military spending 2011 – regional infographic, top 10 military spenders & more. Available at: https://www.army-technology.com/features/featuremilitary-spending-infographic-2011/?cf-view
Arrighi, G. (2010). The Long Twentieth Century: Money, Power, and the Origins of Our Times. London: Verso Books.
Borhi, L. (1999). Containment, Rollback, Liberation or Inaction? The United States and Hungary in the 1950s. Journal of Cold War Studies, 1 (3), 67–108. Available at: http://www.coldwar.hu/publications/rollback.html
Brooks, S. G. (1997). Dueling Realisms. International Organization, 51 (3), 445–477. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2703611
Brown, G., McLean I., McMillan, A. (2018). The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Politics and International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brzezinski, Z. (2001). The Grand Chessboard. Podgorica: CID. [In Serbian]
Cladi, L. (2022) Persevering with bandwagoning, not hedging: why European security cooperation still conforms to realism. Defence Studies, vol. (4). 624–643. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2022.2110476
Cordesman, A. H. (2023). The global nuclear balance: Nuclear forces and key trends in nuclear modernization. Center for Strategic and International Studies. Available at: https://csis-website-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/2023-04/230414_Cordesman_Global_NuclearBalance%202.pdf
De Keersmaeker, G. (2017). Polarity, Balance of Power and International Relations Theory: Post-Cold War and the 19th Century Compared. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Dugin, A. (1997). Foundations of Geopolitics: The Geopolitical Future of Russia. Moscow: Arktogeya. [in Russian]
Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge. New York: Pantheon Books.
Global Firepower (2025). Global Firepower 2025 military strength ranking. Available at: https://www.globalfirepower.com/countries-listing.php
Harrington, A. I. (2016). Power, violence, and nuclear weapons. Critical Studies on Security, 4 (1), 91–112. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/21624887.2016.1177784
Hawkins, M. (1997). Social Darwinism in European and American Thought, 1860–1945: Nature as Model and Nature as Threat. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hertz, J. H. (1950). Idealist Internationalism and the Security Dilemma. World Politics, vol. 2 (2), 157–180. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/2009187
Huntington, S. P. (1996). The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Institute for Economics & Peace (IEP) (2012). Global Peace Index 2011. Available at: https://www.economicsandpeace.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/2011-GPI-Results-Report.pdf
Institute for Economics & Peace (IEP) (2025). Global Peace Index 2025: Measuring peace in a complex world. Vision of Humanity. Available at: https://www.visionofhumanity.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Global-Peace-Index-2025-web.pdf
Korolija, A. (2024). Theory of Ideological Hegemony and the Imperialist Phase of Capitalism (doctoral dissertation). Beograd: Filozofski fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu. https://nardus.mpn.gov.rs/handle/123456789/23921 [In Serbian]
Lachmann, R. (2000). Capitalists in Spite of Themselves: Elite Conflict and Economic Transition in Early Modern Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lange, J. (2024, July 16). Four in five Americans fear country is sliding into chaos, Reuters/Ipsos poll finds. Reuters. Available at: https://www.reuters.com/world/us/four-fiveamericans-fear-country-is-sliding-into-chaos-reutersipsos-poll-finds-2024-07-16/
Larson, C. (2025, June 17). China’s H-20 Stealth Bomber Simply Summed Up in 4 Words. National Security Journal. Available at: https://nationalsecurityjournal.org/chinas-h-20-stealth-bomber-simply-summed-up-in-4-words/
Layne, C. (1993). The Unipolar Illusion: Why New Great Powers Will Rise. International Security, 17 (4), 5–51. https://doi.org/10.2307/2539020
Layne, C. (1994). Kant or Cant: The Myth of the Democratic Peace. International Security, 19 (3), 5–49. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/2539195
Mandić, S. (2024a). Theories on the Origins of Capitalism: The Origin of the Modern World. Beograd: Filozofski fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu. [In Serbian]
Mandić, S. (2024b). The Economic and Ideological Position of Underdeveloped Countries and Their Potential for Emancipation. In: N. Zvijer (ed.). The Inevitability of Interculturality (323–348). Beograd: Filozofski fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu. [In Serbian]
Mandić, S. (2025). Maoism: An Analysis of Its Development and Relation towards the National Question. Sociološki pregled, 59 (1), 256–287. DOI: 10.5937/socpreg59-54370
Marx, K., Engels, F. (2009). The Communist Manifesto. Beograd: Centar za liberterske studije. [In Serbian]
Mearsheimer, J. J. (1994). The False Promise of International Institutions. International Security, 19 (3), 5–49. https://doi.org/10.2307/2539078
Mearsheimer, J. J. (2014). The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: W.W Norton & Company.
Mingst, A. K., McKibben, H. E., Arreguin-Toft, I. M. (2019). Essentials of International Relations. Eighth Edition. New York: W.W Norton & Company.
Moravcsik, A. (1997). Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics. International Organization, vol. 51 (4), 513–553. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081897550447
Peace Research Institute Oslo (2025). Conflict Trends: A Global Overview, 1946–2024. Available at: https://www.prio.org/publications/
Pešić, J. (2025). Dependency Theories, Capitalism from the Perspective of the Periphery. Beograd: Filozofski fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu. [In Serbian]
Pevehouse, J. C. W., Goldstein J. S. (2019). International Relations, Twelfth Edition. Harlow: Pearson.
Poushter, J., Fagan, M., Smerkovich, M., Prozorovsky, A. (2025, August 19). International Opinion on Global Threats. Pew Research Center. Available at: https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2025/08/19/international-opinion-on-global-threats/
Qalampir (2025, July 17). From triads to tactical missiles: who possesses nuclear weapons? Available at: https://qalampir.uz/en/news/triadadan-taktik-raketalargacha-kimlarning-k-ulida-yadro-k-urollari-bor-124405
Ripsman M. N., Levy S. J. (2008). Wishful Thinking or Buying Time? The Logic of British Appeasement in the 1930s. International Security, 33 (2), 148–181. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec.2008.33.2.148
Rose, G. (1998). Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy. World Politics, 51(1), 144–172. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887100007814
Schweller, R. L. (2004). Unanswered Threats: A Neoclassical Realist Theory of Underbalancing. International Security, 29 (2), 159–201. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/4137589
Sklair, L. (2000). The Transnational Capitalist Class. Oxford: Blackwell.
Skocpol, T. (1979). States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) (2024). SIPRI Yearbook 2024, Chapter 2: Trends in armed conflicts. Available at: https://www.sipri.org/yearbook/2024/02
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) (2025, April 28). Trends in world military expenditure, 2024 (SIPRI fact sheet). Available at: https://www.sipri.org/sites/default/files/2025-04/2504_fs_milex_2024.pdf
Tilly, C. (1990). Coercion, Capital, and European States, AD 990–1990. Cambridge: Blackwell.
Trading Economics (2024). Corruption Index Europe. Available at: https://tradingeconomics.com/country-list/corruption-index?continent=europe
Transparency International (2024). Corruption Perceptions Index. Available at: https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2024
Wallerstein, I. (2000). The Essential Wallerstein. New York: The New Press.
Wallerstein, I. (2004). World-Systems Analysis: An Introduction. Durham: Duke University Press.
Wallerstein, I. (2006). The curve of American power. New Left Review, 40, 77–94. Available at: https://newleftreview.org/issues/ii40/articles/immanuel-wallerstein-the-curve-of-american-power
Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of International Politics. London: Addison-Wesly Publishing Company.
Waltz, K. N. (1988). The Origins of War in Neorealist Theory. Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 18 (4), 615–628. https://doi.org/10.2307/204817
Weber, M. (1976). Economy and Society, vol. I. Beograd: Prosveta. [In Serbian]
Wohlforth, W. C. (1999). The Stability of a Unipolar World. International Security, 24 (1), 5–41. https://doi.org/10.1162/016228899560031
Sva prava zadržana (c) 2026 Sociološki pregled
Ovaj rad je pod Creative Commons Autorstvo-Deli pod istim uslovima 4.0 međunarodnom licencom.