Evaluation of odontometric methods in immature permanent teeth: research for a better practice

Kristina Vicko; Jelena Nikolic Ivosevic; Bojan Petrovic

doi:10.2298/VSP160526057V

Kristina Vicko Phd candidate, Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad
Jelena Nikolic Ivosevic Pedodontic resident, Medical faculty, University of Novi Sad
Bojan Petrovic Assistant Professor, Medical faculty, University of Novi Sad

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/VSP160526057V

Keywords: endodontics, root canal preparation, odontometry

Abstract

Abstract

Background/Aim. Determination of correct working length is one of the keys to success in root canal treatment. It provides efficient canal cleaning and shaping, a three-dimensional chermetic obturation and an optimal healing procees following root apex formation. The aim of this work was to evaluate and compare the accuracy and applicability of working lengths determined in permanent immature teeth in vivo using different clinical methods. Methods. The research was conducted at the Dental Clinic of Vojvodina in Novi Sad, the Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry. A sample of 30 canals of young permanent teeth were selected for the research. Inclusion criteria were: a need for endodontic treatmant, young permanent teeth, teeth with incomplete apex formation according to Demirijans stages F and G determined on radiography. Exclusion criteria: more than 3 years from eruption, pathological and iatrogenic resorption of the apex. The canal lenght was measured first on the initial radiograph used later as the parameter for comparison with various clinical methods. Results. The greatest average difference of measured working lengths was found by using electroodontometry and the paper point method afterwards. Regarding individual measurements, the most unprecise reading was with electroodontometry and tactile method up to 5 mm difference, and 4.6 mm was the maximal deviation for radiographic method. A deviation was defined by matching the measurements with a canal length measured on the initial radiograph. Our results showed that there was a difference between observed methods, although there was no statistical significance. Conclusion. The radiographic method and tactile method stand out as dominant methods for odontometry in permanent immature teeth, thanks to highly accurate readings, while the electroodontometry is considered the most unreliable method for determining working length in immature permanent teeth.

References

REFERENCES

Kim YJ, Chandler NP. Determination of working length for teeth with wide or immature apices: a review. Int Endod J 2013; 46(6): 483–91.

Gutmann JL, Heaton JF. Management of the open (immature) apex. 2. Non-vital teeth. Int Endod J 1981; 14(3): 173–8.

Bogen G, Kuttler S. Mineral trioxide aggregate obturation: a re-view and case series. J Endod 2009; 35(6): 777–90.

Flanagan TA. What can cause the pulps of immature, perma-nent teeth with open apices to become necrotic and what treatment options are available for these teeth. Aust Endod J 2014; 40(3): 95–100.

Mohammed RB, Koganti R, Kalyan SV, Tircouveluri S, Singh JR, Srini¬vasulu E. Digital radiographic evaluation of mandibular third molar for age estimation in young adults and adolescents of South Indian population using modified Demirjian's me-thod. J Forensic Dent Sci 2014; 6(3): 191–6.

European Society of Endodontology. Quality guidelines for endo-don¬tic treatment: consensus report of the European Soci¬ety of Endodontology. Int Endod J 2006; 39(12): 921–30.

Rosenberg DB. The paper point technique. Part I. Dent Today 2003; 22(2): 80–6.

Frank AL. Therapy for the divergent pulpless tooth by contin-ued apical formation. J Am Dent Assoc 1966; 72(1): 87–93.

Webber RT. Apexogenesis versus apexification. Dent Clin North Am 1984; 28(4): 669–97.

Beltrame AP, Triches TC, Sartori N, Bolan M. Electronic determi¬nation of root canal working length in primary molar teeth: An in vivo and ex vivo study. Int End J 2011; 4(5): 402–6.

Goldberg F, De Silvio AC, Manfré S, Nastri N. In vitro measure-ment accuracy of an electronic apex locator in teeth with simulated apical root resorption. J Endod 2002; 28(6): 461–3.

Williams CB, Joyce AP, Roberts S. A comparison between in vivo radiographic working length determination and measurement after extraction. J Endod 2006; 32(7): 624–7.

Herrera M, Ábalos C, Lucena C, Jiménez-Planas A, Llamas R. Criti¬cal diameter of apical foramen and of file size using the Root ZX apex locator: an in vitro study. J Endod 2011; 37(9): 1306–9.

Fouad AF, Rivera EM, Krell KV. Accuracy of the Endex with variations in canal irrigants and foramen size. J Endod 1993; 19(2): 63–7.

Briseño BM, Sonnabend E. The influence of different root canal instruments on root canal preparation: An in vitro study. Int Endod J 1991; 24(1): 15–23.

Haffner C, Folwaczny M, Galler K, Hickel R. Accuracy of elec-tronic apex locators in comparison to actual length-an in vivo study. J Dent 2005; 33(8): 619–25.

Mentes A, Gencoglu N. Canal length evaluation of curved canals by direct digital or conventional radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002; 93(1): 88–91.

Ravanshad S, Adl A, Anvar J. Effect of working length mea-sure¬ment by electronic apex locator or radiography on the adequacy of final working length: a randomized clinical trial. J Endod 2010; 36(11): 1753–6.

ElAyouti A, Dima E, Löst C. A tactile method for canal length determination in teeth with open apices. Int Endod J 2009; 42(12): 1090–5.

Economides N, Vouzara T. Non-surgical endodontic retreat-ment after unsuccessful apicectomy: a case report. Balk J Stom 2011; 15(3): 166–70.

Baggett FJ, Mackie IC, Worthington HV. An investigation into the measurement of the working length of immature incisor teeth requiring endodontic treatment in children. Br Dent J 1996; 181(3): 96–8.

Gurtu A, Singhal A, Singhal P. A tactile method for canal length determination in teeth with open apices – A case report. Ann Essences Dent 2010; 2: 36.