Analysis of personality disorder profiles obtained by five-factor personality model
Abstract
Background/Aim. In spite of the growing body of evidence in the field of personality disorders, these disorders still retain the lowest diagnostic reliability of any major category of mental disorders. The aim of this study was to investigate the differences of personality profiles in patients diagnosed with personality disorder in comparison with the group of healthy control subjects, as well as to establish to what extent the five-factor personality model domains determine the specific clusters of personality disorders. Methods. The study group comprised 97 patients diagnosed as personality disorders (according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders – DSM-IV criteria), aged between 18 and 65 years [mean = 35.78 years, standard deviation (SD) = 13.72 years], 67% were female. Control group included 58 healthy subjects (student population) aged between 20 to 35 years (mean = 22.48 years, SD = 2.56 years), 56% were female. The assessment was carried out by the new version of the NEO Personality Inventory-Revised (NEO-PI-R), form S, and the Structured Clinical Interview (SCID II) for DSM-IV disorders. Results. The three clusters were found by the use of regression analysis: cluster A – eccentrics (low scores in agreeableness), cluster B – dramatics (high score in extroversion, low score in agreeableness, and cluster C – anxious (low score in extroversion). The findings showed that the high level of neuroticism was a non-specific predictor of all three clusters, while dimension openness to experience had no predictive power for any of the three clusters. Conclusion. Our findings support the meta-analysis which suggests consistently high level of neuroticism and low level of agreeableness in most personality disorders. The study showed that it is possible to conceptualize personality disorders by using five-factor personality model of normal personality. Integrating the psychiatric classification with the dimensional model of general personality structure could enable the uncovering of essential parameters for setting the diagnosis.
References
Trull TJ, Durrett CA. Categorical and dimensional models of personality disorder. Ann Rev Clin Psychol 2005; 1: 355‒80.
Tyrer P, Crawford M, Mulder R, Blashfield R, Farnam A, Fossati A, et al. The rationale for the reclassification of personality disorders in the 11th revision of the International Classifica-tion of Diseases (ICD-11). Pers Mental Health 2011; 5(4): 246‒59.
Krueger RF, Bezdjian S. Enhancing research and treatment of mental disorders with dimensional concepts: toward DSM-V and ICD-11. World Psychiatry 2009; 8(1): 3‒6.
Berghuis H, Kamphuis JH, Verheul R. Specific personality traits and general personality dysfunction as predictors of the pres-ence and severity of personality disorders in a clinical sample. J Pers Assess 2014; 96(4): 410‒6.
Miller JD, Lynam DR, Widiger T, Leukefeld C. Personality dis-orders as extreme variants of common personality dimen-sions: can the Five-Factor Model adequately represent psy-chopathy? J Pers 2001; 69(2): 253–76.
Widiger TA, Costa PT. Personality and personality disorders. J Abnorm Psychol 1994; 103(1): 78–91.
Samuel DB, Carroll KM, Rounsaville BJ, Ball SA. Personality disorders as maladaptive, extreme variants of normal personal-ity: Borderline personality disorder and neuroticism in a sub-stance using sample. J Pers Disord 2013; 27(5): 625‒35.
Knežević G, Džamonja-Ignjatović T, Đurić-Jočić D. Five-factor per-sonality model. Belgrade: Centar za primenjenu psihologiju; 2004. (Serbian)
Đurić-Joćić D, Džamonja-Ignjatović T, Knežević G. NEO PI-R - application and interpretation. Belograde: Center for Applied Psychology; 2004. (Serbian)
First MB, Gibbon M, Spitzer RL, Williams JBW. The Struc-tured Clinical Interview for DSM–IV Axis II Personality Dis-orders (SCID–II). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press; 1997.
Malouff JM, Thorsteinsson EB, Schutte NS. The relationship be-tween the five-factor model of personality and symptoms of clinical disorders: A meta-analysis. J Psychopathol Behav As-sess 2005; 27(2): 101–14.
Nestadt G, Costa PT Jr, Hsu FC, Samuels J, Bienvenu OJ, Eaton WW. The relationship between the five-factor model and la-tent Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition personality disorder dimensions. Comp Psychia-try 2008; 49(1): 98–105.
Widiger ТА. Five factor model of personality disorders: Inte-grating science and practice. J Res Pers 2005; 39(1): 67–83.
Widiger TA, Costa PT. Integrating Normal and Abnormal Per-sonality Structure: The Five-Factor Model. J Pers 2012; 80(6): 1471–506.
Saulsman LM, Page AC. The five-factor model and personality disorder empirical literature: A meta-analytic review. Clin Psychol Rev 2004; 23(8): 1055‒85.