Sex assessment from the proximal femur in the Spanish  population based on three-dimensional computed tomography  metric analysis

Mirjana  Djorojevic; Concepción Roldán; Miguel Botella; Inmaculada Alemán

doi:10.2298/VSP170920031D

Mirjana Djorojevic University of Granada, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Legal Medicine, Toxicology and Physical Anthropology, Granada, Spain
Concepción Roldán University of Granada, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Biostatistics, Granada, Spain
Miguel Botella University of Granada, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Legal Medicine, Toxicology and Physical Anthropology, Spain
Inmaculada Alemán University of Granada, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Legal Medicine, Toxicology and Physical Anthropology

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/VSP170920031D

Keywords: anthropometry, femur, multidetector computed tomography, sex

Abstract

Abstract

Background/Aim. The studies published in recent years have shown that the linear measurements on the three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) clinical images of the hip bone, skull or breastbone can serve as a reliable alternative method for sex estimation. In spite of the fact that the proximal femur exhibited high dimorphism when examining the skeletal material, there is still a lack of morphometric studies dealing with the CT imaging of this anatomical region that would confirm the relevance of the previously obtained results. The aim of this study was to validate the reliability and precision of some proximal femur measurements obtained in vivo from the 3D-CT models and to compare the accuracies of our findings with those formerly reported by other relevant research. Methods. A total of 146 CT scans (73 male and 73 females) were selected to take 6 measurements using the traditional osteometric methods. The 3D reconstruction was done at 1mm and 1.25 mm thick slices with OsiriX (v.4.1). The univariate and multivariate discriminant functions (DFs) were formulated for assessing sex. Results. The vertical diameter of neck and the vertical diameter of head were found to contribute the most when considered independently (90.4%–91.8%). When combining these with the other dimensions, the prediction accuracy increased up to 97.3%. The accuracy of CT measurements is in accordance with those obtained in the traditional morphometric studies on the skeletonized femurs of contemporary populations. The 3D-CT approach showed remarkably higher percentage of predictive ability in comparison with the 2D technique. Conclusion. 3D-CT is a suitable tool for the objective quantification of osteological data. The medical scans and measurements on living individuals offer a valuable source of data from which the highly reliable skeletal standards can be developed for estimating sex, even from the fragmented remains. The method proposed here can be highly useful especially in the identification of mass disaster victims when the direct osteometry is difficult to apply and maceration of the remains is not an option.

Author Biography

Mirjana Djorojevic, University of Granada, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Legal Medicine, Toxicology and Physical Anthropology, Granada, Spain

Department of Legal Medicine,Toxicology and Physical Anthropology

MSc Forensic Anthropology

References

REFERENCES

Purkait R, Heeresh CH. A study of sexual variation in Indian femur. Forensic Sci Int 2004; 146(1): 25–33.

Seeman E, Delmas PD. Bone quality - the material and structural basis of bone strength and fragility. N Engl J Med 2006; 354(21): 2250–61.

Purkait R. Triangle identified at the proximal end of femur: a new sex determinant. Forensic Sci Int 2005; 147(2): 135–9.

Djorojevic M, Roldán C, Botella M, Alemán I. Estimation of Pur-kait’s triangle method and alternative models for sex assess-ment from the proximal femur in the Spanish population. Int J Legal Med 2015; 130(1): 245–51.

Cardoso HF, Cunha E. On the applicability of some femur measurements for sex diagnosis. In: Varela TA, editor. Investigaciones en biodiversidad humana. Santiago de Compostela: University of Santiago de Compostela; 2000. p. 208–13.

Alunni-Perret V, Staccini P, Quatrehomme G. Re-examination of a measurement for sexual determination using the suproinferior femoral neck diameter in a modern European population. J Forensic Sci 2003; 48(3): 517–20.

Trancho GJ, Robledo B, López-Bueis I, Sánchez JA. Sexual determination of the femur using discriminant functions. Analysis of a Spanish population of known sex and age. J Forensic Sci 1997; 42: 181–5.

Frutos, LR. Brief communication: Sex determination accuracy of the minimum superoinferior femoral neck diameter in a contemporary rural Guatemalan population. Am J Phys Anth-ropol 2003; 122(2): 123–6.

King CA, Iscan MY, Loth SR. Metric and comparative analysis of sexual dimorphism in the Thai femur. J Forensic Sci 1998; 43(5): 954–8.

Stojanowski CM, Seidemann RM. A reevaluation of the sex pre-diction accuracy of the minimum supero-inferior femoral neck diameter for modern individuals. J Forensic Sci 1999; 44(6): 1215–8.

Mostafa EM, El-Elemi AH, El-Beblawy MA, Dawood AE. Adult sex identification using digital radiographs of the proximal epiphysis of the femur at Suez Canal University Hospital in Ismailia, Egypt. Egypt J Forensic Sci 2012; 2(3): 81–8.

Mitra A, Khadijeh B, Vida AP, Ali RN, Farzaneh M, Maryam VF, et al. Sexing based on measurements of the femoral head parameters on pelvic radiographs. J Forensic Leg Med 2014; 23: 70–5.

Harma A, Karakas HM. Determination of sex from the femur in Anatolian Caucasians: a digital radiological study. J Forensic Leg Med 2007; 14(4): 190‒4.

Kranioti EF, Vorniotakis N, Galiatsou C, İşcan MY, Michalodimi-trakis M. Sex identification and software development using digital femoral head radiographs. Forensic Sci Int 2009; 189(1): 113.e1–7.

Ruiz Mediavilla E, Perea Pérez B, Labajo González E, Sánchez Sánchez JA, Santiago Sáez A, Dorado Fernández D. Determining sex by bone volume from 3D images: discriminating analysis of the tali and radii in a contemporary Spanish reference collection. Int J Legal Med 2012; 126(4): 623–31.

Djorojevic M, Roldán C, García-Parra P, Alemán I, Botella M. Morphometric sex estimation from 3D computed tomography os coxae model and its validation in skeletal remains. Int J Legal Med 2014; 128(5): 879–88.

García-Parra P, Pérez Fernández A, Djorojevic M, Botella M, Alemán I. Sexual dimorphism of human sternum in a contemporary Spanish population. Forensic Sci Int 2014; 244: 313.e1‒9.

Gulhan O, Harrison K, Kiris A. A new computer-tomography-based method of sex estimation: development of Turkish population-specific standards. Forensic Sci Int 2015; 255: 2–8.

Clavero A, Salicrú M, Turbón D. Sex prediction from the femur and hip bone using a sample of CT images from a Spanish population. Int J Legal Med 2015; 129(2): 373–83.

De Abajo FJ, Feito L, Júdez J, Martín MC, Terracini B, Pàmpols T, et al. Directrices éticas sobre la creación y uso de registros con fines de investigación biomédica. Rev Esp Salud Pública 2008; 82(1): 21–42.

Schumann S, Tannast M, Nolte LP, Zheng G. Validation of statis-tical shape model based reconstruction of the proximal femur - a morphology study. Med Eng Phys 2010; 32(6): 638–44.

Martin R, Saller K. Lehrbuch der Anthropologie ‒ in systema-tischer Darstellung. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer; 1957.

Osorio H, Schorwer K, Coronado C, Delgado J, Aravena P. Proximal femoral epiphysis anatomy in Chilean population. Orthopedic and forensic aspects. Int J Morphol 2012; 30(1): 258–62.

Ulijaszek SJ, Kerr DA. Anthropometric measurement error and the assessment of nutritional status. Br J Nutr 1999; 82(3): 165–77.

Perini TA, De Oliveira GL, Ornellas JD, Oliveira FP. Technical error of measurement in anthropometry. Rev Bras Med Esporte 2005; 11(1): 81–5.

Weinberg SM, Scott NM, Neiswanger K, Brandon CA, Marazita ML. Digital three-dimensional photogrammetry: evaluation of anthropometric precision and accuracy using a Genex 3D camera system. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2004; 41(5): 507–18.

Rubin PJ, Leyvraz PE, Aubagniac JM, Estève P, de Roguin B. The morphology of the proximal femur: a three-dimensional radio-graphic analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1992; 74(1): 28–32.