Psychometric evaluation of the short version of the Defense Style Questionnaire on Serbian healthy adult men
Abstract
Background/Aim. The most famous instrument for measuring psychological mechanisms of defense is the Defense Style Questionnaire (DSQ-40), which has been increasingly used in our country. In Serbia empirical norms for male adolescent population and for elderly male adults were established. The aim of this study was psychometric evaluation of the short version of the DSQ-40 on a Serbian male middle-age non-clinical sample. Methods. Internal consistency, factor structure and discriminant and concurrent validity of the DSQ-40 were studied in 284 high selected male professional military personnel aged 23 to 53 years (35.09 ± 7.21 years). Results. The Cronbach alpha coefficient revealed a high internal consistency for the entire scale, which confirms the compactness and high reliability of this questionnaire [Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.724; p < 0.01]. Conclusion. Evaluation of Serbian version of DSQ-40 confirms intraclass highly significant coefficients of correlation. The present findings support the applicability of the Serbian version of DSQ-40.
References
Freud A. The ego and the mechanisms of defense. New York, NY, USA: International University Press; 1966.
Andrews G, Pollock C, Stewart G. The determination of defense style by questionnaire. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1989; 46(5): 455–60.
Andrews G, Singh M, Bond M. The Defense Style Question-naire. J Nerv Ment Dis 1993; 181(4): 246–56.
Cramer P. Defense mechanisms: 40 years of empirical re-search. J Pers Assess 2015; 97(2): 114–22.
Bond M, Gardner ST, Christian J, Sigal JJ. Empirical study of self-rated defense styles. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1983; 40(3): 333–8.
Bond MP, Vaillant JS. An empirical study of the relationship between diagnosis and defense style. Arch Gen Psychia-try 1986; 43(3): 285–8.
Vaillant GE. Theoretical hierarchy of adaptive ego mecha-nisms: A 30-year follow-up of 30 men selected for psychologi-cal health. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1971; 24(2): 107–18.
Vaillant GE. Natural history of male psychological health: V. The relation of choice of ego mechanisms of defense to adult adjustment. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1976; 33(5): 535–45.
Vaillant GE, Bond M, Vaillant CO. An empirically validated hierarchy of defence mechanisms. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1986; 43(8): 786–94.
Hyphantis T. The Greek version of the Defense Style Ques-tionnaire: Psychometric properties in three different sam-ples. Compr Psychiatry 2010; 51(6): 618–29.
Ciocca G, Collazzoni A, Limoncin E, Franchi C, Mollaioli D, Di Lorenzo G, et al. Defence mechanisms and attachment styles in paranoid ideation evaluated in a sample of non-clinical young adults. Riv Psichiatr 2017; 52(4): 162‒7.
Colovic O, Lecic Tosevski D, Perunicic Mladenovic I, Milosavljevic M, Munjiza A. Defense Mechanisms in "Pure" Anxiety and "Pure" Depressive Disorders. J Nerv Ment Dis 2016; 204(10): 746‒51.
Iwanicka K, Gerhant A, Olajossy M. Psychopathological symp-toms, defense mechanisms and time perspectives among sub-jects with alcohol dependence (AD) presenting different pat-terns of coping with stress. Peer J 2017; 5: e3576.
Pour SG, Nezhad M, Sabooni M, Mir Ahmadi H. Can defense styles predict psychopathology in adolescents? Proc Soc Behav Sci 2011; 30: 590–5.
Lewis AJ, White J. Brief report: The defense mechanisms of homophobic adolescent males: A descriptive discriminant analysis. J Adolesc 2009; 32(2): 435–41.
Muris P, Winands D, Horselenberg P. Defense styles, personality traits and psychopathological symptoms in nonclinical adoles-cents. J Nerv Ment Dis 2003; 191(12): 771–8.
Blaya C, Kipper L, Heldt E, Isolan L, Ceitlin LH, Bond M, et al. Brazilian-Portuguese version of the Defense Style Question-naire (DSQ-40) for defense mechanisms measure: a prelimi-nary study. Rev Bras Psichiatry 2004; 26(4): 255‒8. (Portu-guese)
Blaya C, Dornelles M, Blaya R, Kipper L, Heldt E, Isolan L, et al. Brazilian–Portuguese version of Defensive Style Question-naire-40 for the assessment of defense mechanisms: construct validity study. Psychother Res 2007; 17(3): 261–70.
Yilmaz N, Gençöz T, Ak M. Psychometric properties of the de-fense style questionnaire: a reliability and validity study. Turk Psikiyatri Derg 2007; 18(3): 244‒53. (Turkish)
Hayashi M, Miyake Y, Minakawa K. Reliability and validity of the Japanese edition of the Defense Style Questionnaire 4. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2004; 58(2): 152‒6.
Cazan AM, Clinciu AI. Psychometric evaluation of the short version of the Defense Style Questionnaire on a Romanian non-clinical sample. Proc Soc Behav Sci 2015; 187: 408‒12.
Parekh MA, Majeed H, Khan TR, Khan AB, Khalid S, Khwaja NM, et al. Ego defense mechanisms in Pakistani medical stu-dents: a cross sectional analysis. BMC Psychiatry 2010; 10: 12.
Chabrol H, Rousseau A, Rodgers R, Callahan S, Pirlot G, Sztulman H. A study of the face validity of the 40 item ver-sion of the Defense Style Questionnaire (DSQ-40). J Nerv Ment Dis 2005; 193(11): 756‒8.
Saint-Martin C, Valls M, Rousseau A, Callahan S, Chabrol H. Psychometric evaluation of a shortened version of the 40-item Defense Style Questionnaire. Int J Psychol Psychol Ther 2013; 13(2): 215–24.
Wilkinson WW, Ritchie TD. The dimensionality of defense-mechanism parcels in the Defense Style Questionnaire-4. Psy-chol Assess 2015; 27(1): 326‒31.
Ruuttu T, Pelkonen M, Holi M, Karlsson L, Kiviruusu O, Heilä H, et al. Marttunen M. Psychometric properties of the Defense Style Questionnaire (DSQ-40) in adolescents. J Nerv Ment Dis 2006; 194(2): 98–105.
Čabarkapa M, Dedić G. Development, basic characteristrics and empirical norms of psychological test DSQ-4. Vojnosanit Pregl 2002; 59(5): 507‒14. (Serbian)
Erić-Marinković J, Dotlić R, Janošević S, Kocev N, Gajić M, Ille T, et al. Statistics for researchers in the field of medical sciences. Belgrade: Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade; 2011. (Serbian)