Psihometrijska procena kratke verzije Upitnika mehanizma odbrane na uzorku zdravih muškaraca u Srbiji
Sažetak
Uvod/Cilj. Najpoznatiji instrument za merenje psiholoških mehanizama odbrane je Upitnik za procenu mehanizama odbrane (DSQ-40), koji se sve više koristi u našoj zemlji. U Srbiji su ustanovljene empirijske norme za muško adolescentno stanovništvo i za starije muške odrasle osobe. Cilj ove studije bio je psihometrijska procena kratke verzije upitnika za mehanizme odbrane (DSQ-40) na nekliničkom uzorku muškaraca srednjeg životnog doba u Srbiji.
Metode. Interna konzistentnost, struktura faktora i diskriminacija i istovremena validnost DSQ-40 su proučavani kod 284 visoko selektovanih profesionalnih vojnih lica muškog pola, starosti od 23 do 53 godine (35,09 ± 7,21 godina). Rezultati. Cronbach-ovi alfa koeficijenti ukazali su na veliku unutrašnju konzistenciju za celu skalu, što potvrđuje kompaktnost i visoku pouzdanost ovog upitnika [Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.724; p < 0.01]. Zaključak. Evaluacija srpske verzije DSQ-40 potvrdila je veoma značajne međuklasne koeficijente korelacije. Sadašnji nalazi podržavaju primenjivost srpske verzije DSQ-40.
Reference
Freud A. The ego and the mechanisms of defense. New York, NY, USA: International University Press; 1966.
Andrews G, Pollock C, Stewart G. The determination of defense style by questionnaire. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1989; 46(5): 455–60.
Andrews G, Singh M, Bond M. The Defense Style Question-naire. J Nerv Ment Dis 1993; 181(4): 246–56.
Cramer P. Defense mechanisms: 40 years of empirical re-search. J Pers Assess 2015; 97(2): 114–22.
Bond M, Gardner ST, Christian J, Sigal JJ. Empirical study of self-rated defense styles. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1983; 40(3): 333–8.
Bond MP, Vaillant JS. An empirical study of the relationship between diagnosis and defense style. Arch Gen Psychia-try 1986; 43(3): 285–8.
Vaillant GE. Theoretical hierarchy of adaptive ego mecha-nisms: A 30-year follow-up of 30 men selected for psychologi-cal health. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1971; 24(2): 107–18.
Vaillant GE. Natural history of male psychological health: V. The relation of choice of ego mechanisms of defense to adult adjustment. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1976; 33(5): 535–45.
Vaillant GE, Bond M, Vaillant CO. An empirically validated hierarchy of defence mechanisms. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1986; 43(8): 786–94.
Hyphantis T. The Greek version of the Defense Style Ques-tionnaire: Psychometric properties in three different sam-ples. Compr Psychiatry 2010; 51(6): 618–29.
Ciocca G, Collazzoni A, Limoncin E, Franchi C, Mollaioli D, Di Lorenzo G, et al. Defence mechanisms and attachment styles in paranoid ideation evaluated in a sample of non-clinical young adults. Riv Psichiatr 2017; 52(4): 162‒7.
Colovic O, Lecic Tosevski D, Perunicic Mladenovic I, Milosavljevic M, Munjiza A. Defense Mechanisms in "Pure" Anxiety and "Pure" Depressive Disorders. J Nerv Ment Dis 2016; 204(10): 746‒51.
Iwanicka K, Gerhant A, Olajossy M. Psychopathological symp-toms, defense mechanisms and time perspectives among sub-jects with alcohol dependence (AD) presenting different pat-terns of coping with stress. Peer J 2017; 5: e3576.
Pour SG, Nezhad M, Sabooni M, Mir Ahmadi H. Can defense styles predict psychopathology in adolescents? Proc Soc Behav Sci 2011; 30: 590–5.
Lewis AJ, White J. Brief report: The defense mechanisms of homophobic adolescent males: A descriptive discriminant analysis. J Adolesc 2009; 32(2): 435–41.
Muris P, Winands D, Horselenberg P. Defense styles, personality traits and psychopathological symptoms in nonclinical adoles-cents. J Nerv Ment Dis 2003; 191(12): 771–8.
Blaya C, Kipper L, Heldt E, Isolan L, Ceitlin LH, Bond M, et al. Brazilian-Portuguese version of the Defense Style Question-naire (DSQ-40) for defense mechanisms measure: a prelimi-nary study. Rev Bras Psichiatry 2004; 26(4): 255‒8. (Portu-guese)
Blaya C, Dornelles M, Blaya R, Kipper L, Heldt E, Isolan L, et al. Brazilian–Portuguese version of Defensive Style Question-naire-40 for the assessment of defense mechanisms: construct validity study. Psychother Res 2007; 17(3): 261–70.
Yilmaz N, Gençöz T, Ak M. Psychometric properties of the de-fense style questionnaire: a reliability and validity study. Turk Psikiyatri Derg 2007; 18(3): 244‒53. (Turkish)
Hayashi M, Miyake Y, Minakawa K. Reliability and validity of the Japanese edition of the Defense Style Questionnaire 4. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2004; 58(2): 152‒6.
Cazan AM, Clinciu AI. Psychometric evaluation of the short version of the Defense Style Questionnaire on a Romanian non-clinical sample. Proc Soc Behav Sci 2015; 187: 408‒12.
Parekh MA, Majeed H, Khan TR, Khan AB, Khalid S, Khwaja NM, et al. Ego defense mechanisms in Pakistani medical stu-dents: a cross sectional analysis. BMC Psychiatry 2010; 10: 12.
Chabrol H, Rousseau A, Rodgers R, Callahan S, Pirlot G, Sztulman H. A study of the face validity of the 40 item ver-sion of the Defense Style Questionnaire (DSQ-40). J Nerv Ment Dis 2005; 193(11): 756‒8.
Saint-Martin C, Valls M, Rousseau A, Callahan S, Chabrol H. Psychometric evaluation of a shortened version of the 40-item Defense Style Questionnaire. Int J Psychol Psychol Ther 2013; 13(2): 215–24.
Wilkinson WW, Ritchie TD. The dimensionality of defense-mechanism parcels in the Defense Style Questionnaire-4. Psy-chol Assess 2015; 27(1): 326‒31.
Ruuttu T, Pelkonen M, Holi M, Karlsson L, Kiviruusu O, Heilä H, et al. Marttunen M. Psychometric properties of the Defense Style Questionnaire (DSQ-40) in adolescents. J Nerv Ment Dis 2006; 194(2): 98–105.
Čabarkapa M, Dedić G. Development, basic characteristrics and empirical norms of psychological test DSQ-4. Vojnosanit Pregl 2002; 59(5): 507‒14. (Serbian)
Erić-Marinković J, Dotlić R, Janošević S, Kocev N, Gajić M, Ille T, et al. Statistics for researchers in the field of medical sciences. Belgrade: Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade; 2011. (Serbian)