Rational and reliable diagnosis of periprosthetic hip and knee joint infection using two nuclear-medicine methods: 99mTc-ciprofloxacin and 99mTc-MDP scintigraphy

  • Dragan Pucar Military Medical Academy, Institute of Nuclear Medicine, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Zoran Janković Military Medical Academy, Institute of Nuclear Medicine, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Srdjan Starčević University of Defence, Faculty of Medicine of the Military Medical Academy, Belgrade, Serbia
Keywords: technetium tc 99m ciprofloxcin, technetium tc 99m medronate, radionuclide imaging, hip prosthesis, knee prosthesis, infection

Abstract


Background/Aim. There is a constant and dramatic increase in hip and knee prosthetic implantations worldwide. However, a decrease in the percentage of failed (infected) prosthetic implantations is not significant (0.5% up to 2%). The real challenge is whether prosthetic joint loosening was caused by aseptic inflammation or by infection. The aim of the present study was to attempt to distinguish sterile inflammation from infection in patients with a painful hip or knee prosthetic joint. Another objective was to determine the accuracy of cumulative bone scintigraphy with methylenediphosphonate (MDP) and ciprofloxacin in diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Methods. Three-phase bone scintigraphy with 99mTc-MDP and 99mTc-ciprofloxacin was used. The patient selection criterion for this study was a suspicion of PJI followed by painful and limited movement of the prosthetic joint, accompanied by elevated unspecific inflammatory factors. Forty five patients with 39 implanted hips and 24 knee prostheses were included and evaluated. All prosthetic joints were examined (although some of them were asymptomatic) and underwent plain radiography. An average time span between the two nuclear medicine imaging procedures was 3–5 days. Three-phase 99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy was performed first. Scintigraphy with 99mTc-ciprofloxacin was necessarily involved calculation of the accumulation index. The obtained results were confirmed by microbiological findings as a gold standard. Statistical analysis of the results was performed using SPSS version 20 software (descriptive statistics, χ2-test). Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were also calculated. Results. Microbiologically confirmed PJI was found in 16 out of 39 hip prostheses. Positive scintigraphy was obtained in 15 out of 39 prosthetic hip joints. PJI was found using scintigraphy of the knee, and microbiologically confirmed in all 13 out of 24 suspected joints. Estimated sensitivity/specificity of 99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy alone (for both joints) was 90%/69%, for 99mTc-ciprofloxacin scintigraphy it was 93%/97%, and for cumulative results it was 96.5%/97%. Conclusion. Cumulative 99mTc-MDP scintigraphy with 99mTc-ciprofloxacin scintigraphy increases the ability of differentiation between aseptic loosening and PJI, with high accuracy of 97%.

References

Osmon DR, Berbari EF, Berendt AR, Lew D, Zimmerli W, Steck-elberg JM, et al. Diagnosis and management of prosthetic joint infection: clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseas-es Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2013; 56(1): e1–e25.

Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89(4): 780–5.

Lentino JR. Prosthetic joint infections: bane of orthopaedists, challenge for infectious disease specialists. Clin Infect Dis 2003; 36(9): 1157–61.

Palestro CJ. Nuclear medicine and the failed joint replacement: Past, present, and future. World J Radiol 2014; 6(7): 446‒58.

Zimmerli W, Trampuz A, Ochsner PE. Prosthetic-joint infec-tions. N Engl J Med 2004; 351(16): 1645‒54.

Berbari EF, Hanssen AD, Duffy MC, Steckelberg JM, Ilstrup DM, Harmsen WS, et al. Risk factors for prosthetic joint infection: case-control study. Clin Infect Dis 1998; 27(5): 1247–54.

Bongartz T, Halligan CS, Osmon DR, Reinalda MS, Bamlet WR, Crowson CS, et al. Incidence and risk factors of prosthetic joint infection after total hip or knee replacement in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2008; 59(12): 1713–20.

Tigges S, Stiles RG, Roberson JR. Complications of hip arthro-plasty causing periprosthetic radiolucency on plain radio-graphs. Am J Roentgenol 1994; 162(6): 1387–91.

Cahir JG, Toms AP, Marshall TJ, Wimhurst J, Nolan J. CT and MRI of hip arthroplasty. Clin Radiol 2007; 62(12): 1163–71; discussion 1172‒3.

Cobo J, Del Pozo JL. Prosthetic joint infection: diagnosis and management. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2011; 9(9): 787–802.

Love C, Palestro CJ. Radionuclide imaging of infection. J Nucl Med Technol 2004; 32(2): 47‒57; quiz 58‒9.

Truluck CA. Nuclear medicine technology: Inflammation and infection imaging. J Radiol Nurs 2007; 26(3): 77–85.

Vinjamuri S, Hall AV, Solanki KK, Bomanji J, Siraj Q, O'Shaughnessy E, et al. Comparison of 99mTc infection imag-ing with radiolabelled white-cell imaging in the evaluation of bacterial infection. Lancet 1996; 347(8996): 233–5.

Britton KE, Wareham DW, Das SS, Solanki KK, Amaral H, BhatnagarA, et al. Imaging bacterial infection with (99m)Tc-ciprofloxacin (Infecton). J Clin Pathol 2002; 55(11): 817–23.

Dumarey N, Blocklet D, Appelboom T, Tant L, Schoutens A. Infec-ton is not specific for bacterial osteo-articular infective pa-thology. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2002; 29(4): 530–5.

Sarda L, Saleh-Mghir A, Peker C, Meulemans A, Crémieux AC, Le Guludec D. Evaluation of (99m)Tc-ciprofloxacin scintigra-phy in a rabbit model of Staphylococcus aureus prosthetic joint infection. J Nucl Med 2002; 43(2): 239–45.

Pucar D. Validity of 99mTc-ciprofloxacin scintigraphy with es-timation of accumulation index in diagnostic of bone infec-tion [thesis]. Belgrade: Military Medical Academy; 2006. (Ser-bian)

Pucar D, Jankovic Z, Dugonjic S, Popovic Z. Estimation of 99mTc-ciprofloxacin accumulation indexes in bone and joint bacterial infections. Vojnosanit Pregl 2009; 66(5): 395–8.

Gemmel F, Hans Van den Wyngaert, Love C, Welling MM, PP Gemmel Palestro CJ. Prosthetic joint infections: radionuclide state-of-the-art imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2012; 39(5): 892‒909.

Love C, Tronco G, Yu A, Marwin S, Nichols K, Palestro C. Diag-nosing lower extremity (LE) prosthetic joint infection: Bone, gallium & labelled leukocyte imaging. J Nucl Med 2008; 49(Suppl 1): 133P.

van der Bruggen W, Bleeker-Rovers CP, Boerman OC, Gotthardt M, Oyen WJ. PET and SPECT in Osteomyelitis and Prosthetic Bone and Joint Infections: A Systematic Review. Semin Nucl Med 2010; 40(1): 3‒15.

Pucar D, Janković Z, Bascarevic Z, Starcevic S, Radulovic M, Sisic M, et al. Combined 99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy and 99mTc-Ciprofloxacin scintigraphy in differentiation of hip and knee prosthesis aseptic loosening and infection: Preliminary study. Vojnosanit Pregl 2017; 74(7): 666–71.

Nagoya S, Kaya M, Sasaki M, Tateda K, Yamashita T. Diagnosis of peri-prosthetic infection at the hip using triple-phase bone scintigraphy. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008; 90(2): 140‒4.

Zajonz D, Wuthe L, Tiepolt S, Brandmeier P, Prietzel T, von Salis-Soglio GF, et al. Diagnostic work-up strategy for periprosthetic joint infections after total hip and knee arthroplasty: A 12-year experience on 320 consecutive cases. Patient Saf Surg 2015; 9: 20.

Published
2021/06/14
Section
Original Paper