Racionalna i pouzdana dijagnoza periprotetske infekcije kuka i kolena korišćenjem dve nuklearno-medicinske metode: 99mTc-ciprofloksacin i 99mTc-MDP scintigrafije

  • Dragan Pucar Military Medical Academy, Institute of Nuclear Medicine, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Zoran Janković Military Medical Academy, Institute of Nuclear Medicine, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Srdjan Starčević University of Defence, Faculty of Medicine of the Military Medical Academy, Belgrade, Serbia
Ključne reči: tehnecijum tc 99m ciprofloksacin, tehnecijum tc 99m medronat, radioizotopsko snimanje, kuk, proteza, koleno, proteza, infekcija

Sažetak


Uvod/Cilj. Postoji dramatičan i konstantan porast ugradnje novih proteza kuka i kolena širom sveta. Međutim, procenat neuspelih (inficiranih) protetskih implantacija se ne smanjuje značajno (0,5% do 2%). Pravi izazov je pitanje da li je nastalo razlabavljenje protetskog zgloba uzrokovano aseptičnom upalom ili infekcijom. Cilj studije bio je pokušaj odvajanja sterilne upale od infekcije kod bolesnika sa bolnim protetskim zglobovima kuka ili kolena. Pored toga, naš cilj je bio da utvrdimo tačnost kombinovane scintigrafije kostiju metilendifosfonatom (MDP) i ciprofloksacinom u dijagnostici periprotetske infekcije zglobova (PJI). Metode. Korišćena je trofazna scintigrafija kostiju sa 99mTc-MDP i 99mTc-ciprofloksacin. Kriterijum za odabir bolesnika za ovo istraživanje bila je sumnja na PJI praćenu bolom i ograničenim pokretima protetskog zgloba uz povišenje nespecifičnih faktora upale. Uključeno je i procenjeno 45 bolesnika sa implantiranih 39 proteza kuka i 24 proteze kolena. Pregledani su svi protetski zglobovi (iako su neki zglobovi bili asimptomatski) i kod svih je bila urađena planarna radiografija. Vremenski razmak između izvedenih

 

nuklearno-medicinskih metoda iznosio je u proseku 3–5 dana. Prvo je izvođena trofazna 99mTc-MDP scintigrafija kostiju. Scintigrafiju 99mTc-ciprofloksacinom obavezno je pratilo izračunavanje indeksa akumulacije. Dobijeni rezultati su bili potvrđeni mikrobiološkim nalazima kao zlatnim standardom. Statistička analiza dobijenih rezultata urađena je pomoću softvera SPSS, verzija 20 (deskriptivna statistika, χ2-test). Takođe su bili izračunati osetljivost, specifičnost i prediktivne vrednosti. Rezultati. Mikrobiološki potvrđene PJI bile su prisutne kod 16 od 39 proteza kuka. Pozitivna scintigrafija je dobijena kod 15 od 39 proteza kuka. Scintigrafija kolena je bila pozitivna kod svih 13 od 24 protetska zgloba kolena koji su imali mikrobiološku potvrdu PJI. Izračunata osetljivost/specifičnost za 99mTc-MDP scintigrafiju kosti (za oba zgloba) iznosila je 90%/69%, za 99mTc-ciprofloksacin scintigrafiju 93%/97%, a za kombinaciju obe scintigrafije 96,5%/97%. Zaključak. Kombinovana scintigrafija sa 99mTc-MDP i 99mTc-ciprofloksacinom povećava sposobnost razlikovanja aseptičnog labavljenja protetskog zgloba od PJI sa visokom tačnošću od 97%.

Reference

Osmon DR, Berbari EF, Berendt AR, Lew D, Zimmerli W, Steck-elberg JM, et al. Diagnosis and management of prosthetic joint infection: clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseas-es Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2013; 56(1): e1–e25.

Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89(4): 780–5.

Lentino JR. Prosthetic joint infections: bane of orthopaedists, challenge for infectious disease specialists. Clin Infect Dis 2003; 36(9): 1157–61.

Palestro CJ. Nuclear medicine and the failed joint replacement: Past, present, and future. World J Radiol 2014; 6(7): 446‒58.

Zimmerli W, Trampuz A, Ochsner PE. Prosthetic-joint infec-tions. N Engl J Med 2004; 351(16): 1645‒54.

Berbari EF, Hanssen AD, Duffy MC, Steckelberg JM, Ilstrup DM, Harmsen WS, et al. Risk factors for prosthetic joint infection: case-control study. Clin Infect Dis 1998; 27(5): 1247–54.

Bongartz T, Halligan CS, Osmon DR, Reinalda MS, Bamlet WR, Crowson CS, et al. Incidence and risk factors of prosthetic joint infection after total hip or knee replacement in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2008; 59(12): 1713–20.

Tigges S, Stiles RG, Roberson JR. Complications of hip arthro-plasty causing periprosthetic radiolucency on plain radio-graphs. Am J Roentgenol 1994; 162(6): 1387–91.

Cahir JG, Toms AP, Marshall TJ, Wimhurst J, Nolan J. CT and MRI of hip arthroplasty. Clin Radiol 2007; 62(12): 1163–71; discussion 1172‒3.

Cobo J, Del Pozo JL. Prosthetic joint infection: diagnosis and management. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2011; 9(9): 787–802.

Love C, Palestro CJ. Radionuclide imaging of infection. J Nucl Med Technol 2004; 32(2): 47‒57; quiz 58‒9.

Truluck CA. Nuclear medicine technology: Inflammation and infection imaging. J Radiol Nurs 2007; 26(3): 77–85.

Vinjamuri S, Hall AV, Solanki KK, Bomanji J, Siraj Q, O'Shaughnessy E, et al. Comparison of 99mTc infection imag-ing with radiolabelled white-cell imaging in the evaluation of bacterial infection. Lancet 1996; 347(8996): 233–5.

Britton KE, Wareham DW, Das SS, Solanki KK, Amaral H, BhatnagarA, et al. Imaging bacterial infection with (99m)Tc-ciprofloxacin (Infecton). J Clin Pathol 2002; 55(11): 817–23.

Dumarey N, Blocklet D, Appelboom T, Tant L, Schoutens A. Infec-ton is not specific for bacterial osteo-articular infective pa-thology. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2002; 29(4): 530–5.

Sarda L, Saleh-Mghir A, Peker C, Meulemans A, Crémieux AC, Le Guludec D. Evaluation of (99m)Tc-ciprofloxacin scintigra-phy in a rabbit model of Staphylococcus aureus prosthetic joint infection. J Nucl Med 2002; 43(2): 239–45.

Pucar D. Validity of 99mTc-ciprofloxacin scintigraphy with es-timation of accumulation index in diagnostic of bone infec-tion [thesis]. Belgrade: Military Medical Academy; 2006. (Ser-bian)

Pucar D, Jankovic Z, Dugonjic S, Popovic Z. Estimation of 99mTc-ciprofloxacin accumulation indexes in bone and joint bacterial infections. Vojnosanit Pregl 2009; 66(5): 395–8.

Gemmel F, Hans Van den Wyngaert, Love C, Welling MM, PP Gemmel Palestro CJ. Prosthetic joint infections: radionuclide state-of-the-art imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2012; 39(5): 892‒909.

Love C, Tronco G, Yu A, Marwin S, Nichols K, Palestro C. Diag-nosing lower extremity (LE) prosthetic joint infection: Bone, gallium & labelled leukocyte imaging. J Nucl Med 2008; 49(Suppl 1): 133P.

van der Bruggen W, Bleeker-Rovers CP, Boerman OC, Gotthardt M, Oyen WJ. PET and SPECT in Osteomyelitis and Prosthetic Bone and Joint Infections: A Systematic Review. Semin Nucl Med 2010; 40(1): 3‒15.

Pucar D, Janković Z, Bascarevic Z, Starcevic S, Radulovic M, Sisic M, et al. Combined 99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy and 99mTc-Ciprofloxacin scintigraphy in differentiation of hip and knee prosthesis aseptic loosening and infection: Preliminary study. Vojnosanit Pregl 2017; 74(7): 666–71.

Nagoya S, Kaya M, Sasaki M, Tateda K, Yamashita T. Diagnosis of peri-prosthetic infection at the hip using triple-phase bone scintigraphy. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008; 90(2): 140‒4.

Zajonz D, Wuthe L, Tiepolt S, Brandmeier P, Prietzel T, von Salis-Soglio GF, et al. Diagnostic work-up strategy for periprosthetic joint infections after total hip and knee arthroplasty: A 12-year experience on 320 consecutive cases. Patient Saf Surg 2015; 9: 20.

Objavljeno
2021/06/14
Rubrika
Originalni članak