Anatomically high division of sciatic nerve and its clinical significance
Abstract
Background / Aim. The sciatic nerve (SN) is a mixed nerve formed in pelvis by joining of L4 - S3 anterior spinal nerve roots. SN can be under the pressure in different regions throughout its course. However, the most frequent site of impingement is under the piriformis muscle which causes the occurrence of piriformis syndrome. High division of SN has its relevance considering the fact that it leads to the compression of nerve resulting in piriformis syndrome. The aim of this study was to determine the connection between anatomical parameters of pelvis and high division of SN, which is considered to be one of the most common causes of piriformis syndrome in both genders. Methods. This study was conducted on 28 formalin fixed cadavers of both genders at the Institute of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade (Belgrade, Serbia) and the Department of Anatomy, School of Medicine, University of St Andrews (St Andrews, United Kingdom). For the measuring of required dimensions, we used a ruler and a caliper. Results. A statistically significant difference in the values of bispinal and bituberal lines was observed. A high division of SN was found on 58.33% of the male cadavers and 80% of the female cadavers. A statistically significant difference in the mean value of the bituberal line between the male and female sex was also recognised. Conclusion. The connection between the anatomical parameters of the pelvis and the level of division of the SN is confirmed. Although on the basis of the results it could be assumed that people with smaller pelvic dimensions would have greater likelihood of developing a piriformis syndrome, the other factors, such as biomechanics related to a wider „Q angle“ in women that could result in a higher incidence of piriformis syndrome, should also be considered.
References
Patel S, Shah M, Vora R, Zalawadia A, Rathod SP. A variation in the high division of the sciatic nerve and its relation with piriformis muscle. Natl J Med Res 2011; 1(2): 27−30.
Adibatti M, Sangeetha V. Study on variant anatomy of sciatic nerve. J Clin Diagn Res 2014; 8(8): AC07−9.
Distad BJ, Weiss MD. Clinical and electrodiagnostic features of sciatic neuropathies. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2013; 24(1): 107−20.
Davut O, Yakup G, Sevgi B, Senoglu M, Kalender AM, Calik M. The topographical features and variations of nervus ischiadicus in human fetuses. Bratisl Lek Listy 2011; 112(8): 475−8.
Beaton LE, Anson BJ. The relation of the sciatic nerve and of its subdivisions to the piriformis muscle. The Anat Rec 1937; 70(1): 1–5. doi: 10.1002/ar.1090700102.
Babinski MA, Machado FA, Costa WS. A rare variation in the high division of the sciatic nerve surrounding the superior gemellus muscle. Eur J Morphol 2003; 41(1): 41–42.
Meknas K, Christensen A, Johansen O. The internal obturator muscle may cause sciatic pain. Pain 2003; 104(1−2): 375−80.
Boyajian-O'Neill LA, McClain RL, Coleman MK, Thomas PP. Diagnosis and management of piriformis syndrome: an osteopathic approach. J Am Osteopath Assoc 2008; 108(11): 657−64.
Miller TA, White KP, Ross DC. The diagnosis and management of Piriformis Syndrome: myths and facts. Can J Neurol Sci 2012; 39(5): 577–83.
Güvençer M, Akyer P, Iyem C, Tetik S, Naderi S. Anatomic considerations and the relationship between the piriformis muscle and the sciatic nerve. Surg Radiol Anat 2008; 30(6): 467−74.