Distance visual acuity in air force pilots and student pilots when exposed to + Gz acceleration in human centrifuge
Abstract
Background/Aim. High speeds that modern aircraft develop during take-off, flight and landing place an additional strain on the organ of vision. Owing to its considerable practical implementation in air combat, the effect of +Gz acceleration on the organ of vision is considered increasingly important for research. Substantial changes in visual functions may occur during high acceleration onset rates. However, it is important for a pilot to maintain visual acuity in order to be able to monitor new functional displays for rapid orientation, scan the configuration of terrain, display of weapons systems and enemy aircraft and deal with additional issues of the complexity of spatial orientation. The aim of the investigation was to establish whether distance visual acuity in air force pilots and student pilots is affected when exposed to +Gz acceleration. Меthods. The study was performed on a defined population consisting of 95 respondents from 21 to 45 years of age divided into two groups. The first group included 65 air force pilots and the second group comprised of 30 student pilots, all of whom were exposed to an acceleration of +5.5 Gz. The testing was performed in a human centrifuge, which mimics conditions of real Gz acceleration, in the Department of Biodynamics in Aero Medical Institute (Zemun, Serbia). We examined the obtained differences in distance visual acuity before and after exposure to acceleration. Results. After the testing, all respondents in the group of air force pilots had distance visual acuity of 1.0, while in the group of student pilots a statistically significant difference in distance visual acuity was observed after being exposed to +Gz acceleration. Conclusion. Transient changes in distant visual acuity were more pronounced in the group of student pilots in comparison with the changes in visual acuity in the air force pilots when exposed to the same acceleration values (+5Gz acceleration). Since change in distance visual acuity is the most sensitive physiological indicator when exposed to high acceleration, individual physiological pilot training in the human centrifuge increases tolerance to accelerations, which is important for flight safety in both peacetime and combat conditions.
References
Čolić J. Determination of visual acuity using different types of optotypes. Expertal work paper. Novi Sad: Faculty of Scienc-es, Department of Physics; 2016. (Serbian)
Davis JR., Johnson R, Stepanek J, Fogarty JA. Fundamentals of Aerospace Medicine. 4th ed. New York, NY: Lippincott Wil-liams & Wilkins (LWW); 2008.
Wołkanowski M, Truszczyński O, Wojtkowiak M. New method of visual disturbances assessment in pilots during tests in the Polish human centrifuge. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 2007; 20(1): 44‒7.
Rudnjanin S, Arsic-Komljenovic G, Pavlovic M, Vujnovic J. Loss of consciousness as criterion of +Gz tolerance at Institute of Aviation Medicine MMA during +Gz acceleration selective test. Acta Physiol Hung 2006; 93(4): 371‒6.
Harrison MF, Coffey B, Albert WJ, Fischer SL. Night vision gog-gle-induced neck pain in military helicopter aircrew: a litera-ture review. Aerosp Med Hum Perform 2015; 86(1): 46‒55.
Agarwal A, Werchan PM, Lessard C. Neurovestibular effects of +Gz. Ind J Aerosp Med 2002; 46: 34‒41.
Norsk P. Cardiovascular and fluid volume control in humans in space. Curr Pharm Biotechnol 2005; 6(4): 325‒30.
Rickards CA, Newman DG. G-induced visual and cognitive disturbances in a survey of 65 operational fighter pilots. Aviat Space Environ Med 2005; 76(5): 496‒500.
Hovis JK, Pilecki N. Simulated night vision goggle wear and colored aftereffects. Aviat Space Environ Med 2013; 84(3): 206‒11.
Pattarini JM, Blue RS, Castleberry TL, Vanderploeg JM. Preflight screening techniques for centrifuge-simulated suborbital spaceflight. Aviat Space Environ Med 2014; 85(12): 1217‒21.
Curdt Christiansen C, Drageger J, Kriebel J. Principles and Prac-tice of Aviation Medicine. 1st ed. London: World Scientific Publishing Company; 2009.
DeHart RL, Fundamentals of Aerospace Medicine. Philadel-phia, PA: Lea & Febiger 2003. P. 398‒410.
Feigl B, Zele AJ, Stewart IB. Mild systemic hypoxia and photop-ic visual field sensitivity. Acta Ophthalmol 2011; 89(2): e199‒e204.
Tsai ML, Horng CT, Liu CC, Shieh P, Hung CL, Lu DW, et al. Ocular responses and visual performance after emergent accel-eration stress. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011; 52(12): 8680‒5.
Dalecki M, Bock O, Guardiera S. Simulated flight path control of fighter pilots and novice subjects at +3 Gz in a human cen-trifuge. Aviat Space Environ Med 2010; 81(5):484‒8.
Feigl B, Stewart I, Brown B. Experimental hypoxia in human eyes: implications for ischaemic disease. Clin Neurophysiol 2007; 118(4): 887‒95.
Tsai ML, Liu CC, Wu YC, Wang CH, Shieh P, Lu DW, et al. Ocular responses and visual performance after high- accelera-tion force exposure. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Set 2009; 50(10): 4836‒9.
Yu CS, Wang EM, Li WC, Braithwaite G. Pilots' visual scan patterns and situation awareness in flight operations. Aviat Space Environ Med 2014; 85(7): 708‒14.