Treatment of velopharingeal insufficiency with turn over mucoperiosteal palatal flap in a patient with DiGeorge syndrome

  • Jefta V Kozarski Military Medical Academy, Clinic for Plastic Surgery and Burns, Belgrade, Serbia; University of Defence, Faculty of Medicine of the Military Medical Academy, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Mila Veselinović University of Novi Sad, Facult of Medicine, Department of Special Education and Rehabilitation, Novi Sad, Serbia
  • Lazar Djorović Military Medical Academy, Clinic for Plastic Surgery and Burns, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Biljana Mitrić Military Medical Academy, Clinic for Plastic Surgery and Burns, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Ksenija Kozarski Uppsala University, Faculty of Medicine, Uppsala University Hospital Akademiska, Psychyatric Clinic, Uppsala, Sweden
Keywords: digeorge syndrome;, velopharingeal insufficiency;, cleft palate;, speech disorders;, rehabilitation of speech and language disorders

Abstract


Introduction. DiGeorge syndrome (velocardiofacial syndrome) occurs in about 1 in 4,000 people. It is characterized by incomplete gene penetration, due to which there is significant variability in the clinical picture in different patients. The paper describes the successful application of an inverted mucoperiosteal flap of the palate in a nine-year-old girl with DiGeorge syndrome who had pronounced velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI). Case report. The girl was the first-born child from a normal pregnancy and a normal birth with a normal early psychomotor development. During breastfeeding, milk was occasionally returned to the nose, and later deviations from normal speech (incomprehensible and nasal speech) were noticed. At the age of 4, detailed genetic testing was performed and a microdeletion of 22q11 chromosome was found. Also, a submucosal cleft palate was established, and magnetic resonance angiography of the head and neck revealed an abnormal position of the left internal carotid artery (ICA) that extended submucosally to the central axis of the posterior wall of the pharynx. Then, the submucosal cleft palate was surgically resolved in other clinical center, but without speech improvement. Pharyngoplasty was not performed due to the risk of serious postoperative complications. It was explained to the parents that speech recovery will not be satisfactory without surgical treatment of VPI. At the age of 9, the girl was admitted to the Clinic for Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Burns of the Military Medical Academy in Belgrade for surgical treatment of VPI. Taking into account the potential risks of certain surgical methods, it was decided to perform intravelar veloplasty according to Furlow. Since it was intraoperatively found that the soft palate is too short and that this procedure cannot provide its sufficient length, the mucoperiosteal flap was lifted from the palate to the palatal aponeuroses on the posterior edges of the palatine bones leaving their oral surfaces exposed. The mucoperiosteal flap raised in this way could not also provide the required length of the soft palate only by retroposition. However, its length is 160% of the soft palate axis length, which was enough to turn over the front of the flap towards the pharynx of the soft palate to reach its posterior wall. The raised mucoperiosteal palatal flap has no muscles, so its motility was achieved by the fact that along the edges of the existing short and mobile palate, the flap was fixed to the existing palate and uvula. This provided the anatomical preconditions for speech recovery, shown during the one-year postoperative follow-up of the child. Exposed palatine bones and short palate was covered by mucosal tissue, without cystic formations. Conclusion. The mucoperiosteal palatal flap can be easily, successfully and maximally safely applied in the resolution of VPI in patients with DiGeorge syndrome where there is an aberrant submucosal position of the ICA. This flap could be a ʽflap of choiceʼ for such patients with atopic position of the ISA, too.

Author Biography

Jefta V Kozarski, Military Medical Academy, Clinic for Plastic Surgery and Burns, Belgrade, Serbia; University of Defence, Faculty of Medicine of the Military Medical Academy, Belgrade, Serbia

Specijalista za plastičnu, rekonstruktivnu i estetsku hirurgiju

References

Swillen A, Vogels A, Devriendt K, Fryns JP. Chromosome 22q11 deletion syndrome: update and review of the clinical features, cognitive-behavioral spectrum, and psychiatric complications. Am Med Genet 2000; 97(2): 128–35.

Muldoon M, Ousley OY, Kobrynski LJ, Patel S, Oster ME, Fernan-dez-Carriba S, et al. The effect of hypocalcemia in early child-hood on autism-related social and communication skills in pa-tients with 22q11 deletion syndrome. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosc 2015; 265 (6): 519–24.

Scherer NJ, D'Antonio LL, Kalbfleisch JH. Early speech and lan-guage development in children with velocardiofacial syn-drome. Am J Med Genet 1999; 88 (6): 714–23.

Scherer NJ, D'Antonio LL, Rodgers JR. Profiles of communica-tion disorder in children with velocardiofacial syndrome: comparison to children with Down syndrome. Genet Med 2001; 3(1): 72–8.

Eliez S, Palacio-Espasa F, Spira A, Lacroix M, Pont C, Luthi F, et al. Young children with Velo-Cardio-Facial syndrome (CATCH-22). Psychological and language phenotypes. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2000; 9(2): 109‒14.

Solot CB, Knightly C, Handler SD, Gerdes M, McDonald-McGinn DM, Moss E. Communication disorders in the 22Q11.2 mi-crodeletion syndrome. J Commun Disord 2000; 33(3): 187–203; quiz 203‒4.

Persson C, Niklasson L, Oskarsdóttir S, Johansson S, Jönsson R, Söderpalm E. Language skills in 5-8-year-old children with 22q11 deletion syndrome. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2006; 41(3): 313–33.

Solot CB, Sell D, Mayne A, Baylis AL, Persson C, Jackson O, et al. Speech-language disorders in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome: Best practices for diagnosis and treatment. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2019; 28(3): 984‒99.

Published
2022/01/25
Section
Case report