Anatomical and functional study of the musculus psoas major and nervus femoralis in correlation with pelvic diameters

  • Aleksandar Vojvodić Clinical Center of Zemun, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Aleksandar Matić University of Kragujevac, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kragujevac, Serbia
  • Jelena Mihailović Mayo Clinic, Department of Radiology, Rochester, MN, USA
  • Predrag Bjelogrlić University of St Andrews, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anatomy and Clinical Skills, Scotland, UK
  • Laslo Puškaš University of Belgrade, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Anatomy “Niko Miljanić”, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Lazar Stijak University of Belgrade, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Anatomy “Niko Miljanić”, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Dubravka Aleksić University of Belgrade, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Anatomy “Niko Miljanić”, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Branka Filipović University of Belgrade, Faculty of Medicine, Belgrade, Serbia; University Clinical Hospital Center “Dr Dragiša Mišović – Dedinje“, Department of Gastroenterology, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Biserka Vukomanović-Djurdjević University of Defence, Faculty of Medicine of the Military Medical Academy, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Slobodan Kapor University of Belgrade, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Anatomy “Niko Miljanić”, Belgrade, Serbia
Keywords: anatomy;, femoral nerve;, pelvis;, psoas muscles;, sex factors

Abstract


Background/Aim. The iliopsoas muscle [musculus (m.) iliopsoas] originates from the Greek word psóa, which means loin and represents the only muscle in the body with anatomical preconditions to simultaneously and directly contribute to the stability and movement of the trunk, pelvis, and legs. M. iliopsoas belongs to the inner thigh muscle group and forms part of the posterior abdominal wall. This muscle is the major flexor of the hip joint, and it is functionally essential for proper posture, walking, running, and other physical activities. The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between the anatomical parameters of the pelvis and nervus (n.) femoralis, as well as the relationship between the same pelvic parameters and m. psoas major. Methods. The study was conducted at the Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, on cadaveric material of the Institute of Anatomy “Niko Miljanić”. For measurement purposes, 14 cadavers were used, seven of which were male and seven female, aged 67–79 years. The measuring instruments used in this study were a ruler and an electronic digital caliper (measuring range 0–500 mm, resolution 0.01 mm). Statistical data processing was performed in the SPSS 11.0 program using the Mann-Whitney U test. Results. The results of this study indicate a significant statistical difference in pelvic width between male and female cadavers, which was observed in the reduction of the bituberal line in females, while the parameters of the bispinal line showed no significant difference between the two genders. The decrease of the bituberal line in females was followed by an increase in the width of the proximal origin with a statistically significant decrease in the length of the proximal origin of the m. psoas major. Furthermore, the vertical distance of n. femoralis from the exit point of the muscle to the bispinal line was significantly reduced in the male cadavers. Conclusion. Based on our results, we can assume that, in most cases, due to the smaller bituberal and bispinal line or narrower pelvis, a shorter proximal attachment of the m. psoas major will occur with greater width (L2–L5 level) in the female than in the male gender, resulting in a longer vertical distance of n. femoralis. Such results indicate a close correlation between the anatomical parameters of the m. psoas major, which may affect the distance of n. femoralis exit from the muscle.

References

Andersson E, Oddsson L, Grundström H, Thorstensson A. The role of the psoas and iliacus muscles for stability and movement of the lumbar spine, pelvis and hip. Scand J Med Sci Sports 1995; 5(1): 10‒6.

Arbanas J, Starčević-Klasan G, Malnar D. Composition of the psoas major muscle regarding its complex function. Med Flum [Internet] 2012 [accessed on: 2023 June 29]; 48(2): 123–30. Available from: https://hrcak.srce.hr/84186 (Croatian)

Bordoni B, Varacallo M. Anatomy, Bony Pelvis and Lower Limb, Iliopsoas Muscle. [updated 2023 Apr 24]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023. [cited 2023 May]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.

gov/books/NBK531508/

Mrvaljević D. Anatomy of the lower limb. 2nd edition. Bel-grade: Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade; 2018. p.31–4.

Jelev L, Shivarov V, Surchev L. Bilateral variations of the psoas major and the iliacus muscles and presence of an undescribed variant muscle--accessory iliopsoas muscle. Ann Anat 2005; 187(3): 281‒6.

Siccardi MA, Tariq MA, Valle C. Anatomy, Bony Pelvis and Lower Limb: Psoas Major. [updated 2022 Aug 8]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publish-ing; 2018 [cited 2018 Dec 13]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK535418/

Basinger H, Hogg JP. Anatomy, Abdomen and Pelvis: Femoral Triangle. [updated 2023 Mar 11]. In StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2019 [cited 2019 Apr 29]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/boo

ks/NBK541140/

Kapor S, Puškaš L, Vojvodić A, Mališ M, Bjelogrlić P, Cezayirli E, et al. Anatomically high division of sciatic nerve and its clini-cal significance. Vojnosanit Pregl 2021; 78(10): 1060–4.

Yoshio M, Murakami G, Sato T, Sato S, Noriyasu S. The function of the psoas major muscle: passive kinetics and morphological studies using donated cadavers. J Orthop Sci 2002; 7(2): 199–207.

Laible C, Swanson D, Garofolo G, Rose DJ. Iliospoas Syndrome in Dancers. Orthop J Sports Med 2013; 1(3): 2325967113500638.

Johnson MA, Polgar J, Weightman D, Appleton D. Data on the distribution of fibre types in thirty-six human muscles: An au-topsy study. J Neurol Sci 1973; 18(1): 111‒29.

Kimura T. Composition of psoas major muscle fibers compared among humans, orangutans and monkeys. Z Morphol Anthro-pol 2002; 83(2–3): 305‒14.

Zheng A, Rahkila P, Vuori J, Rasi S, Takala T, Väänänen HK. Quantification of carbonic anhydrase III and myoglobin in dif-ferent fiber types of human psoas muscle. Histochemistry 1992; 97(1): 77–81.

Arbanas J, Klasan GS, Nikolić M, Jerković R, Miljanović I, Malnar D. Fibre type composition of the human psoas major muscle with regard to the level of its origin. J Anat 2009; 215(6): 636‒41.

Kepler CK, Bogner EA, Herzog RJ, Huand RC. Anatomy of the psoas muscle and lumbar plexus with respect to the surgical approach for lateral transpsoas interbody fusion. Eur Spine J 2011; 20(4): 550–6.

Mladonado P, Slocum PD, Chin K, Corton M. Anatomic relation-ships of psoas muscle: clinical applications to psoas hitch ure-teral reimplantation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 211(5): 563. e1–6.

Regev GJ, Chen L, Dhawan M, Lee YP, Garfin SR, Kim CW. Morphometric Analysis of the ventral nerve roots and retro-peritoneal vessels with respect to the minimally invasive lat-eral approach in normal and deformed spines. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009; 34(12): 1330–5.

Kirchmair L, Lirk P, Colvin J, Mitterschiffthaler G, Moriggl B. Lumbar plexus and psoas major muscle: not always as ex-pected. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2008; 33(2): 109–14.

Güvençer M, Akyer P, Iyem C, Tetik S, Naderi S. Anatomic con-siderations and the relationship between the piriformis muscle and the sciatic nerve. Surg Radiol Anat 2008; 30(6): 467‒74.

Published
2023/11/02
Section
Original Paper