Introduction to verification of the GOHAI instrument for measuring

  • Željka V Popović Military Medical Center “Novi Beograd“, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Ivanka Gajić Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Belgrade
  • Kosovka Obradović-Đuričić Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Belgrade
  • Dragoslav P Milošević Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade

Abstract


Abstract

Background/Aim. Quality of life related to health should be seen as a multidimensional concept that, in addition to the physical symptoms associated with a disease and treatment, should include physical, psychological and social functioning of a person. The primary objective of this study was to use the Serbian preliminary version of the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI) questionnaire in oder to examine the consistency, reliability and stability, as well as an introduction to the verification tool. Methods. The GOHAI questionnaire with 6-level Likert scale, translated into Serbian, including the relevant oral health characteristics (oral hygiene, required dentures, number of teeth extracted), was filled by five specialists in prosthodontics for 30 randomly selected respondents, before and after the dental prosthetic treatment. Subsequently, in order to measure the reliability of the questionnaire, 27 patients were re-interviewed. Results. The value of Cronbach's Alpha Coefficient (Crα) before the treatment was 0.878, and after the treatment it was 0.788 confirming the internal consistency and stability of the questionnaire. The validity of discriminatory properties of the GOHAI was confirmed by the Spearman's correlation coefficient (r), which was highly significantly associated with oral health characteristics, confirming the high reliability of the measurement. The results of test-retest analysis measured by the individual Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) were in the range of 0.34–0.97, and for the total score r was 0.927, while the Kappa coefficient was 0.63. The correlation analysis of the GOHAI score before the treatment showed that for 10 questions there was a statistically significant correlation of the score with the answers to the questions, and for 6 questions Spearman’s r was ≥ 0.7. After the treatment a highly significant correlation of the GOHAI was shown with the answers to 10 questions, while for 5 questions the Spearman’s r was > 0.6. The GOHAI average score before the treatment was 19.44 ± 11.12, and after the treatment 2.77 ± 3.83, where the lower value indicates better quality of life. Conclusion. The results of this pilot study confirm internal consistency and stability of the Serbian preliminary version of the GOHAI questionnaire and the causal relation between the quality of life and the characteristics of oral health of the patients with dentures. Accordingly, instrument verification is recommended.

Key words:

dentures; aged; questionnaires; quality of life; serbia.

Author Biographies

Željka V Popović, Military Medical Center “Novi Beograd“, Belgrade, Serbia

Magistar stomatoloških nauka iz oblasti socijalne medicine

Specijalista stomatološke protetike

Ivanka Gajić, Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Belgrade

Profesor Univerziteta U Beogradu

Doktor medicinskih nauka

Specijalista higijene i preventivne medicine

Kosovka Obradović-Đuričić, Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Belgrade

Profesor Univerziteta u Beogradu

Doktor stomatoloških nauka

Specijalista stomatološke protetike

Dragoslav P Milošević, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade

Profesor Univerziteta u Beogradu 

Doktor medicinskih nauka

Specijalista interne medicine-gerijatar

References

Maneesriwongul W, Dixon JK. Instrument translation process: a methods review. J Adv Nurs 2004; 48(2): 175−86.

Kristjansson EA, Desrochers A, Zumbo B. Translating and adapting measurement instruments for cross-linguistic and cross-cultural research: a guide for practitioners. Can J Nurs Res 2003; 35(2): 127−42.

Daradkeh S, Khader YS. Translation and validation of the Arabic version of the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI). J Oral Sci 2008; 50(4): 453−9.

Slade GD. Measuring oral health and quality of life. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina, Dental Ecology; 1997.

Bianco VC, Rubo JH. Aging, Oral Health and Quality of Life. Brazil, Bauru, SP: Department of Prosthodontics, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo; 2012.

Finbarr PA. Assessment of oral health related quality of life. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2003; 1: 40.

Institute of Public Health. Analysis of the use of health care of older people in primary health care in the city of Zagreb. Zagreb: Institute of Public Health; 1988. (Croatian)

Mathur VP, Jain V, Pillai RS, Kalra S. Translation and validation of Hindi version of Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index. Gerodontology 2013; doi: 10.1111/ger.12099.

Hebling E, Pereira AC. Oral health-related quality of life: a critical appraisal of assessment tools used in elderly people. Gerodontology 2007; 24(3): 151–61.

Brondani M, He S.Translating Oral Health-Related Quality of LifeMeasures: Are There Alternative Methodologies? Translating quality of life measures. Soc Indic Res 2013; 111(1): 387–401.

da Silva SR; Rosell FL; Valsecki Junior A. Oral health perception of pregnant women seen at a healthcare center in the municipality of Araraquara, São Paulo, Brazil. Rev Bras Saúde Matern Infant 2006; 6(4): 405−10. (Portuguese)

Hassel AJ, Rolko C, Koke U, Leisen J, Rammelsberg P. A German version of the GOHAI. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2008; 36(1): 34–42.

Onnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric theory. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill;1994.

Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 2007; 60(1): 34−42.

Othman WN, Muttalib KA, Bakri R, Doss JG, Jaafar N, Salleh NC, et al. Validation of the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI) in the Malay language. J Public Health Dent 2006; 66(3): 199−204.

Ikebe K, Hazeyama T, Enoki K, Murai S, Okada T, Kagawa R, et al. Comparison of GOHAI and OHIP-14 measures in relation to objective values of oral function in elderly Japanese. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2012; 40(5): 406−14.

El Osta N, Tubert-Jeannin S, Hennequin M, Bou Abboud Naaman N, El Osta L,Geahchan N. Comparison of the OHIP-14 and GOHAI as measures of oral health among elderly in Lebanon. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2012; 10: 131.

Slade GD, Spencer AJ. Development and evaluation of the Oral Health Impact Profile. Community Dent Health 1994; 11(1): 3–11.

Stančić I, Tihaček Šojić Lj, Jelenković A. Adaptation of Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) index for measuring impact of oral health on quality of life in elderly to Serbian language. Vojnosanit Pregl 2009; 66(7): 511−5. (Serbian)

Atchison KA, Dolan TA. Development of the geriatric oral health assessment index. J Dent Educ 1996; 54(11): 680–7.

Ikebe K, Hazeyama T, Enoki K, Murai S, Okada T, Kagawa R, et al. Comparison of GOHAI and OHIP-14 measures in relation to objective values of oral function in elderly Japanese. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2012; 40(5): 406−14.

Allison PJ, Locker D, Feine JS. Quality of life: a dynamic construct. Soc Sci Med 1997; 45(2): 221−30.

Sheiham A. Oral health, general health and quality of life. Bull World Health Organ 2005; 83(9): 644.

Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales. A practical guide to their development and use. New York: Oxford University Press; 2003.

Cronbach LJ. Internal consistency of tests: analyses old and new. Psychometrika1988; 53, 63–70.

Deshmukh S P, Radke UM. Translation and validation of Hindi version of Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index. Gerodontology 2012; 29(3): 243.

Hägglin C, Berggren U, Lundgren J. A Swedish version of the GOHAI index. Psychometric properties and validation. Swed Dent J 2005; 29(3): 113−24.

Murariu A, Hanganu C. The relationship between denture wearing and Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index in a group of institutionalized Romanian 65−74 year olds. Oral Health Dent Manag 2011; 10(2) 64−9.

El Osta N, Tubert-Jeannin S, Hennequin M, Bou Abboud Naaman N, El Osta L, Geahchan N. Comparison of the OHIP-14 and GOHAI as measures of oral health among elderly in Lebanon. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2012; 10: 131.

Lemos C, Madalena M, Luciane Z, Jorge R, Letícia M, Flório M, et al. Oral health conditions and self-perception among edentulous individuals with different prosthetic status. Braz J Oral Sci 2013; 12(1): 5.

Daradkeh S, Khader YS. Translation and validation of the Arabic version of the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI). J Oral Sci 2008; 50(4): 453−9.

Tubert-Jeannin S, Riordan PJ, Morel-Papernot A, Porcheray S, Saby-Collet S. Validation of an oral health quality of life index (GOHAI) in France. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2003; 31(4): 275−84.

John OP, Benet-Martinez V. Measurement: Reliability, construct validation, and scale construction. In: Reis HT, Judd CM, editors. Handbook of research methods in social psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2000. p. 339−69.

Makhija SK, Gilbert GH, Boykin MJ, Litaker MS, Allman RM, Baker PS, et al. The relationship between sociodemographic factors and oral health-related quality of life in dentate and edentulous community-dwelling older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 2006; 54(11): 1701−12.

World Health Organization. WHO Quality of life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011.

World Health Organization.WHOQOL - Measuring quality of life. Division of mental health and prevention of substance abuse. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1968.

Published
2017/01/20
Section
Original Paper