Uvod u verifikaciju instrumenta GOHAI za merenje oralnozdravstvenog kvaliteta života osoba sa zubnim nadoknadama primenom preliminarne srpske verzije – pilot studija

  • Željka V Popović Želka Popović Odeljenje za stomatolosku protetiku VMC Novi Berograd
  • Ivanka Gajić Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Belgrade
  • Kosovka Obradović-Đuričić Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Belgrade
  • Dragoslav P Milošević Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade

Sažetak


Apstrakt

Uvod/Cilj. Kvalitet života u vezi sa zdravljem treba posmatrati kao multidimenzioni koncept koji, pored fizičkih simptoma vezanih za bolest i lečenje, treba da obuhvati i fizičko, psihičko i društveno funkcionisanje osobe. Primarni cilj studije bio je da se korišćenjem preliminarne srpske verzije upitnika Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI) ispita konzistentnost, pouzdanost i stabilnost, kao uvod u verifikaciju instrumenta. Metode. GOHAI upitnik sa 6-stepenom Likertovom skalom, preveden na srpski jezik, koji je uključivao i oralnozdravstvene karakteristike (oralna higijena, potrebne zubne nadoknade, broj izvađenih zuba), popunjavan je od strane petoro specijalista stomatološke protetike za 30 slučajno izabranih ispitanika, pre i posle stomatoprotetskog lečenja. Naknadno, radi merenja pouzdanosti upitnika, ponovo je intervjuisano 27 ispitanika. Rezultati. Vrednost Cronbach's Alpha Coefficient (Crα pre lečenja bila je 0,878, a posle lečenja 0,788, čime su potvrđene interna konzistentnost i stabilnost upitnika. Valjanost diskriminatornog svojstva GOHAI potvrđena je vrednostima Spearmanovog koeficijenta korelacije (r), koji je značajan kada su u pitanju oralnozdravstvene karakteristike, čime je potvrđena valjanost merenja. Rezultati test-retest analize merene pojedinačnim Pearsonovim koeficijentom korelacije (r) bili su u rasponu 0,34–0,97, a za ukupan skor r je bio 0,927, dok je Kappa koeficijent bio 0,63. Korelaciona analiza GOHAI pre lečenja ukazala je da je za 10 pitanja postojala značajna povezanost skora sa odgovorima na pitanja, a za 6 Spearmanov r bio je ≥ 0,7. Posle lečenja utvrđena je značajna veza GOHAI sa odgovorima na 10 pitanja, a za 5 Spearmanov r bio je > 0.6. Prosek GOHAI skora pre lečenja bio je 19,44 ± 11,12, a posle lečenja 2,77 ± 3,83, gde manja vrednost ukazuje na bolji kvalitet života. Zaključak. Rezultati ovog pilot istraživanja potvrdili su internu konzistentnost i stabilnost preliminarne srpske verzije GOHAI upitnika, kao i kauzalnu vezu kvaliteta života sa karakteristikama oralnog zdravlja ispitanika sa zubnim nadoknadama, te se može preporučiti sprovođenje verifikacije instrumenta.

Ključne reči:

proteze; stare osobe; upitnici; kvalitet života; srbija.

Biografije autora

Željka V Popović, Želka Popović Odeljenje za stomatolosku protetiku VMC Novi Berograd

Magistar stomatoloških nauka iz oblasti socijalne medicine

Specijalista stomatološke protetike

Ivanka Gajić, Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Belgrade

Profesor Univerziteta U Beogradu

Doktor medicinskih nauka

Specijalista higijene i preventivne medicine

Kosovka Obradović-Đuričić, Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Belgrade

Profesor Univerziteta u Beogradu

Doktor stomatoloških nauka

Specijalista stomatološke protetike

Dragoslav P Milošević, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade

Profesor Univerziteta u Beogradu 

Doktor medicinskih nauka

Specijalista interne medicine-gerijatar

Reference

Maneesriwongul W, Dixon JK. Instrument translation process: a methods review. J Adv Nurs 2004; 48(2): 175−86.

Kristjansson EA, Desrochers A, Zumbo B. Translating and adapting measurement instruments for cross-linguistic and cross-cultural research: a guide for practitioners. Can J Nurs Res 2003; 35(2): 127−42.

Daradkeh S, Khader YS. Translation and validation of the Arabic version of the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI). J Oral Sci 2008; 50(4): 453−9.

Slade GD. Measuring oral health and quality of life. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina, Dental Ecology; 1997.

Bianco VC, Rubo JH. Aging, Oral Health and Quality of Life. Brazil, Bauru, SP: Department of Prosthodontics, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo; 2012.

Finbarr PA. Assessment of oral health related quality of life. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2003; 1: 40.

Institute of Public Health. Analysis of the use of health care of older people in primary health care in the city of Zagreb. Zagreb: Institute of Public Health; 1988. (Croatian)

Mathur VP, Jain V, Pillai RS, Kalra S. Translation and validation of Hindi version of Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index. Gerodontology 2013; doi: 10.1111/ger.12099.

Hebling E, Pereira AC. Oral health-related quality of life: a critical appraisal of assessment tools used in elderly people. Gerodontology 2007; 24(3): 151–61.

Brondani M, He S.Translating Oral Health-Related Quality of LifeMeasures: Are There Alternative Methodologies? Translating quality of life measures. Soc Indic Res 2013; 111(1): 387–401.

da Silva SR; Rosell FL; Valsecki Junior A. Oral health perception of pregnant women seen at a healthcare center in the municipality of Araraquara, São Paulo, Brazil. Rev Bras Saúde Matern Infant 2006; 6(4): 405−10. (Portuguese)

Hassel AJ, Rolko C, Koke U, Leisen J, Rammelsberg P. A German version of the GOHAI. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2008; 36(1): 34–42.

Onnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric theory. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill;1994.

Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 2007; 60(1): 34−42.

Othman WN, Muttalib KA, Bakri R, Doss JG, Jaafar N, Salleh NC, et al. Validation of the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI) in the Malay language. J Public Health Dent 2006; 66(3): 199−204.

Ikebe K, Hazeyama T, Enoki K, Murai S, Okada T, Kagawa R, et al. Comparison of GOHAI and OHIP-14 measures in relation to objective values of oral function in elderly Japanese. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2012; 40(5): 406−14.

El Osta N, Tubert-Jeannin S, Hennequin M, Bou Abboud Naaman N, El Osta L,Geahchan N. Comparison of the OHIP-14 and GOHAI as measures of oral health among elderly in Lebanon. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2012; 10: 131.

Slade GD, Spencer AJ. Development and evaluation of the Oral Health Impact Profile. Community Dent Health 1994; 11(1): 3–11.

Stančić I, Tihaček Šojić Lj, Jelenković A. Adaptation of Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) index for measuring impact of oral health on quality of life in elderly to Serbian language. Vojnosanit Pregl 2009; 66(7): 511−5. (Serbian)

Atchison KA, Dolan TA. Development of the geriatric oral health assessment index. J Dent Educ 1996; 54(11): 680–7.

Ikebe K, Hazeyama T, Enoki K, Murai S, Okada T, Kagawa R, et al. Comparison of GOHAI and OHIP-14 measures in relation to objective values of oral function in elderly Japanese. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2012; 40(5): 406−14.

Allison PJ, Locker D, Feine JS. Quality of life: a dynamic construct. Soc Sci Med 1997; 45(2): 221−30.

Sheiham A. Oral health, general health and quality of life. Bull World Health Organ 2005; 83(9): 644.

Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales. A practical guide to their development and use. New York: Oxford University Press; 2003.

Cronbach LJ. Internal consistency of tests: analyses old and new. Psychometrika1988; 53, 63–70.

Deshmukh S P, Radke UM. Translation and validation of Hindi version of Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index. Gerodontology 2012; 29(3): 243.

Hägglin C, Berggren U, Lundgren J. A Swedish version of the GOHAI index. Psychometric properties and validation. Swed Dent J 2005; 29(3): 113−24.

Murariu A, Hanganu C. The relationship between denture wearing and Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index in a group of institutionalized Romanian 65−74 year olds. Oral Health Dent Manag 2011; 10(2) 64−9.

El Osta N, Tubert-Jeannin S, Hennequin M, Bou Abboud Naaman N, El Osta L, Geahchan N. Comparison of the OHIP-14 and GOHAI as measures of oral health among elderly in Lebanon. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2012; 10: 131.

Lemos C, Madalena M, Luciane Z, Jorge R, Letícia M, Flório M, et al. Oral health conditions and self-perception among edentulous individuals with different prosthetic status. Braz J Oral Sci 2013; 12(1): 5.

Daradkeh S, Khader YS. Translation and validation of the Arabic version of the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI). J Oral Sci 2008; 50(4): 453−9.

Tubert-Jeannin S, Riordan PJ, Morel-Papernot A, Porcheray S, Saby-Collet S. Validation of an oral health quality of life index (GOHAI) in France. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2003; 31(4): 275−84.

John OP, Benet-Martinez V. Measurement: Reliability, construct validation, and scale construction. In: Reis HT, Judd CM, editors. Handbook of research methods in social psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2000. p. 339−69.

Makhija SK, Gilbert GH, Boykin MJ, Litaker MS, Allman RM, Baker PS, et al. The relationship between sociodemographic factors and oral health-related quality of life in dentate and edentulous community-dwelling older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 2006; 54(11): 1701−12.

World Health Organization. WHO Quality of life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011.

World Health Organization.WHOQOL - Measuring quality of life. Division of mental health and prevention of substance abuse. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1968.

Objavljeno
2017/01/20
Rubrika
Originalni članak