Limb apraxia in multiple sclerosis
Abstract
Background/Aim. There are almost no studies on apraxia in people with multiple sclerosis. Although the white matter is damaged in MS, it is not the only location in which the pathological changes are present. Demyelinated lesions in the cortex have recently been recognized as important components of multiple sclerosis pathology. The aim of this study was to determine whether apraxia is present among people with MS, and the importance of demographic characteristics and impairment of functional systems at conceptualization and execution of movements. Methods. The experimental group consisted of 30 patients, mean age 51.34 ± 7.70 years. The patients in the experimental group were diagnosed with MS according to the McDonald criteria. The control group consisted of 30 healthy subjects, mean age 50.30 ± 10.47 years. For research purposes, we used the following instruments: Questionnaire for Collecting Demographic Data, Kurtzke Functional Systems Scores, Waterloo-Sunnybrook Apraxia Battery (WatAB). Execution of motion tasks that are a part of the WatAB were incorporated in the System for the Observation and Analysis of Motor Behavior. Results. Our study showed that limb apraxia was common in people with MS. Apraxia was present during pantomime in 26.70% of the patients, and during the imitation of movements in 44.80% of the patients. Gender, age, education level, duration of disease and a form of MS did not determine the quality of conceptualization and execution of movements. The time elapsed from the last exacerbation was a determinant of quality of executed movements. Impairments of functional systems predicted impairments of movement execution. The expanded disability scale score correlated with the severity of apraxia. Conclusion. Our study confirm the presence of apraxia in MS. It is necessary to carry out further studies using functional magnetic resonance imaging, as well as the conduct longitudinal studies to determine the precise structure of motor behavior in people with MS.
References
Poeck K. The clinical examination for motor apraxia. Neuro-psychologia 1986; 24(1): 129−34.
Roy EA, Square PA. Common considerations in the study of limb, verbal and oral apraxia. In: Roy EA, editor. Advances in Psychology: Neuropsychological studies of apraxia and related disorders. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers; 1985. p. 111−61.
Roy EA, Square PA. Neuropsychology of movement sequenc-ing disorders and apraxia. In: Zaidel D, editor. Handbook of Perception and Cognition: Neuropsychology. New York: Erl-baum; 1994. p. 185−218.
Noseworthy JH, Lucchinetti C, Rodriguez M, Weinshenker BG. Mul-tiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 2000; 343(13): 938−52.
Runge VM, Price AC, Kirshner HS, Allen JH, Partain CL, James AE. The evaluation of multiple sclerosis by magnetic reso-nance imaging. Radiographics 1986; 6(2): 203−12.
Nagara H, Inoue T, Koga T, Kitaguchi T, Tateishi J, Goto I. Forma-lin fixed brains are useful for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study. J Neurol Sci 1987; 81(1): 67−77.
Walker CA, Huttner AJ, O'connor KC. Cortical injury in multiple sclerosis; the role of the immune system. BMC Neurology 2011; 11(1): 152.
Brownell B, Hughes JT. The distribution of plaques in the cere-brum in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 1962; 25: 315−20.
Kamm CP, Heldner MR, Vanbellingen T, Mattle HP, Müri R, Bohl-halter S. Limb apraxia in multiple sclerosis: prevalence and im-pact on manual dexterity and activities of daily living. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2012; 93(6): 1081−5.
McDonald WI, Compston A, Edan G, Goodkin D, Hartung HP, Lublin FD, et al. Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the International Panel on the diag-nosis of multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 2001; 50(1): 121−7.
Medenica V, Rapaic D, Nedovic G, Ivanovic L, Trgovcevic S, Potic S, et al. Contemporary models and preservation assessment pos-sibilities in conceptual-production system of voluntary motor action. Healthmed 2012; 6(9): 3194−201.
Staff NP, Lucchinetti CF, Keegan MB. Multiple sclerosis with pre-dominant, severe cognitive impairment. Arch Neurol 2009; 66(9): 1139−43.
Chipman K, Hampson E. A female advantage in the imitation of gestures by preschool children. Dev Neuropsychol 2007; 31(2): 137−58.
Chipman K, Hampson E. A female advantage in the serial pro-duction of non-representational learned gestures. Neuropsy-chologia 2006; 44(12): 2315−29.
Kimura D. Sex differences in cerebral organization for speech and praxic functions. Can J Psychol 1983; 37(1): 19−35.
Kimura D. Neuromotor mechanisms in human communica-tion. NewYork: Oxford University Press; 1993.
Kimura D, Hampson E. Neural and hormonal mechanisms mediating sex differences in cognition. In: Vernon PA, editor. Biological approaches to the study of human intelligence. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corp; 1993. p. 375−97.
Cohen NR, Pomplun M, Gold BJ, Sekuler R. Sex differences in the acquisition of complex skilled movements. Exp Brain Res 2010; 205(2): 183−93.
Pozzilli C, Tomassini V, Marinelli F, Paolillo A, Gasperini C, Basti-anello S. 'Gender gap' in multiple sclerosis: magnetic resonance imaging evidence. Eur J Neurol 2003; 10(1): 95−7.
Dimeck PT, Roy EA, Hall CR. Aging and working memory in gesture imitation. Brain Cognit 1998; 37(1): 124−6.
Stamenova V, Black SE, Roy EA. A model-based approach to long-term recovery of limb apraxia after stroke. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 2011; 33(9): 954−71.
Fowler CJ, Griffiths D, Groat WC. The neural control of micturi-tion. Nat Rev Neurosci 2008; 9(6): 453−66.
DasGupta R, Kavia RB, Fowler CJ. Cerebral mechanisms and voiding function. BJU Int 2007; 99(4): 731−4.
Kavia RB, Dasgupta R, Fowler CJ. Functional imaging and the central control of the bladder. J Comp Neurol 2005; 493(1): 27−32.
Pardo JV, Fox PT, Raichle ME. Localization of a human system for sustained attention by positron emission tomography. Na-ture 1991; 349(6304): 61−4.