Psychopathology and resilience in relation to abuse in childhood among youth first referred to the psychiatrist

  • Milica Pejović Milovančević Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia; Institute of Mental Health, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Lazar Tenjović Department of Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Veronika Išpanović Faculty of Media and Communication, Department of Psychology, University Singidunum, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Marija Mitković Institute of Mental Health, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Jelena Radosavljev Kirćanski Institute of Mental Health, Belgrade, Serbia; Faculty of Media and Communication, Department of Psychology, University Singidunum, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Teodora Minčić Institute of Mental Health, Belgrade, Serbia;
  • Vladimir Miletić Association for Mental Health Promotion, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Saveta Draganić Gajić Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia; Institute of Mental Health, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Dušica Lečić Toševski Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia; Institute of Mental Health, Belgrade, Serbia
Keywords: psychopathology, resilience, psychological, child abuse, adolescent psyhiatry,

Abstract


Background/Aim. Child abuse may be related to adverse psychological outcomes in adult life. However, little is known about specific clinical, family and resilience profiles of adolescents that have experienced child abuse. The aim of this study was to investigate clinical symptoms, family functioning and resilience characteristics of adolescents with the experience of abuse, first referred to psychiatrists. Methods. The study included 84 young participants (mean age 14.90 ± 3.10, ranging from 11 to 18 years) as consecutive first referrals to the Clinic for Children and Youth of the Institute of Mental Health, Belgrade, Serbia. The sample consisted of two groups, based on the Child Abuse Matrices of Risks. The first group included adolescents with the experience of abuse in childhood (n = 38, 13 males, 25 females), whereas the second, control group, comprised of non-abused adolescents (n = 47, 20 males, 27 females). The presence of abuse was evaluated by the Child Abuse Matrices of Risks. The study used the following questionnaires: Youth Self-Report (YSR), Adolescent Resilience Attitudes Scale (ARAS), and Self-Report Family Inventory (SFI). Results. Significant differences were found only among females. According to YSR, the abused girls had significantly higher scores on the Delinquent Behavior scale and marginally higher scores on Anxious/Depressed and Social Problems scales. Analyses of the SFI showed significantly lower family functioning among the girls with the child abuse history for all scales except for the Directive Leadership. The abused girls also showed significantly lower scores on the Insight scale, and marginally lower Initiative scores at the ARAS. Conclusions. These findings may have practical application in the creation of specific preventive and treatment strategies, particularly focused on delinquent tendencies, as well as on enhancing resilience through providing positive environments within families, schools and communities.

 

References

Egeland B, Yates T, Appleyard K, van Dulmen M. The long-term consequences of maltreatment in the early years: a develop-mental pathway model to antisocial behavior. Children's Ser-vices 2002; 5(4): 249−60.

Kendall-Tackett KA, Williams LM, Finkelhor D. Impact of sexual abuse on children: A review and synthesis of recent empirical studies. Psycholl Bull 1993; 113(1): 164−80.

Forbey DJ, Ben-Porath SY, Davis LD. A comparison of sexually abused and non-sexually abused adolescents in a clinical treat-ment facility using MMPI-A. Child Abuse Negl 2000; 24(4): 557−68.

Dodge KA, Bates JE, Pettit GS. Mechanisms in the cycle of vi-olence. Science 1990; 250(4988): 1678−83.

Flisher AJ, Kramer RA, Hoven CW, Greenwald S, Alegria M, Bird HR, et al. Psychosocial characteristics of physically abused children and adolescents. J Am Acad Adolesc Psychiatry 1997; 36(1): 123−31.

Vandivere S, Gallagher M, Moore KA. Changes in children's well being and family environments: Snapshots of America's fami-lies III. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute; 2004.

Masten AS. Ordinary magic: Resilience process in develop-ment. Am Psychol 2001; 56(3): 227−38.

Howell KH, Graham-Sandra A, Czyz E, Lilly M. Assessing resi-lience in preschool children exposed to intimate partner vi-olence. Violence Vict 2010; 25(2): 150−64.

Biscoe B, Harris B. R.A.S. Resilience Attitudes Scale Manuel (adolescent version). Oklahoma City: Eagle Ridge Institute; 1994.

Lyssenko L, Rottmann N, Bengel J. Research on psychological re-silience. Relevance for prevention and health promotion. Bun-desgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 2010; 53(10): 1067−72. (German)

Strand JA, Peacock TD. Nurturing Resilience and School Suc-cess in American Indian and Alska Native Students. ERIC Di-gest. Champaign, IL: ERIC Clearinghouse on Rural Education and Small Schools Charleston WV; 1999. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED-99-CO-0027).

Rutter M. Resilience: Some conceptual considerations. J Ado-lesc Health 1993; 14(8): 626−31, 690−6.

Grotberg E. Promoting resilience in children: A new approach. Birmingham: University of Alabama, The Civitan Center; 1994.

Hunter AJ, Chandler GE. Adolescent Resilience. J Nurs Scho-larsh 1999; 31(3): 243−7.

Rutter M. Psychosocial resilience and protective mechanisms. Am J Ortopsychiatry 1987; 57(3): 316−31.

McCrory E, De Brito SA, Viding E. The link between child abuse and psychopathology: a review of neurobiological and genetic research. J R Soc Med 2012; 105(4): 151−6.

Williams J, Nelson-Gardell D. Predicting resilience in sexually abused adolescents. Child Abuse Negl 2012; 36(1): 53−63.

Pejović Milovančević M, Minčić T, Kalanj D (Ed.). Manual for the application of the Special Healthcare Protocol for Protection of Children from Abuse and Neglect. Belgrade: Institute of Mental Health; 2012. (Serbian)

Achenbach TM. Manual for the Youth Self-Report and 1991 Profile. Burlington, VT: Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont; 1991.

Beavers WR, Hampson RB. Successful families, assessment and intervention. New York, London: WW Norton & Company; 1990.

Pitzer LM, Fingerman KL. Psychosocial resources and associa-tions between childhood physical abuse and adult well-being. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2010; 65(4): 425−33.

Parker JG, Herrera C. Interpersonal processes in friendship: A comparison of maltreated and non-maltreated children's expe-riences. Dev Psychol 1996; 32: 1025−38.

Widom CS. Childhood victimization: Early adversity, later psy-chopathology. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice Journal; 2000.

Papazian B. Brief analytic essay on unconscious forces facilitat-ing transgenerational repetition of physical or sexual abuse. Psychiatr Enfant 1994; 37(2): 353−60.

Lee V, Hoaken PN. Cognition, emotion, and neurobiological development: mediating the relation between maltreatment and aggression. Child Maltreat 2007; 12(3): 281−98.

Boulet M, Ethier LS, Couture G. Life events and trauma in chronic negligent mothers. Sante Ment Qué 2004; 29(1): 221−42.

Peters SR, Peters SD. Violent adolescent females. Corrections Today 1998; 60(3): 28−9.

Ghazarian SR, Roche KM. Social support and low-income, urban mothers: longitudinal associations with adolescent delinquen-cy. J Youth Adolesc 2010; 39(9): 1097−108.

Afifi TO, Macmillan HL. Resilience following child maltreat-ment: a review of protective factors. Can J Psychiatry 2011; 56(5): 266−72.

Hawkins JD, Herrenkohl T, Farrington DP, Brewer D, Catalano RF, Harachi T. A review of predictors of youth violence. In: Loeber R, Farington D , editors. Serious and violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1998. p. 106−46.

Miller BV, Fox BR, Garcia-Beckwith L. Intervening in severe physical child abuse cases: mental health, legal and social ser-vices. Child Abuse Negl 1999; 23(9): 905−14.

Rousseau C, Drapeau A. Are Refugee Children an At-Risk Group? A Longitudinal Study of Cambodian Adolescents. J Refug Stud 2003; 16(1): 67−81.

Luthar SS, Zigler E. Vulnerability and competence: A review of research on resilience in childhood. Am J Ortopsychiatry 1991; 61(1): 6−22.

Magistretti PJ, Ansermet F. Neuronal plasticity: a new paradigm for resilience. Schweiz Arch Neurol Psychiatr 2008; 159(8): 475−9.

Egeland B, Susman A. Dissociation as a mediator of child abuse across generations. Child Abuse Negl 1996; 20(11): 1123-−2.

Baron-Cohen S. The extreme-male-brain theory of autism. In: Tager-Flusberg H, editor. Neurodevelopmental disorders. Cam-bridge, MA: The MIT Press; 1999. p. 401−30.

Lai D, Tseng Y, Hou Y, Guo H. Gender and geographic differ-ences in the prevalence of autism spectrum disorders in child-ren: analysis of data from the national disability registry of Taiwan. Res Dev Disabil 2012; 33(3): 909−15.

Published
2015/04/23
Section
Original Paper