Computer and experimental analyses of the stress state in the cement hip joint endoprosthesis body
Abstract
Background/Aim. One of the possible complications after implantation of a cement hip-joint endoprosthesis is fracture in the endoprosthesis body. Fractures arise from overload or material fatigue of which an implant is made. The purpose of this research was to define the intensity of maximum stress and the positions of a critical cross-section in the endoprosthesis body. Methods. Unilaterally changing forces which act on the hip joint during walking as well as the loads result in flexible deformations of the endoprosthesis body. Biomechanical analysis of the forces acting on the hip joint determine their direction and intensity, whereas on the basis of Gruen’s classification of the endoprosthesis body loosening the level of fixation is established. The bodies of cement hip joint endoprosthesis are made of cobalt-chromium-molybdenum (CoCrMo) alloy, suitable for vacuum casting, are submitted to the analysis. Analysis of the critical stress in the endoprosthesis body was performed on the endoprosthesis body by means of the finite element method. The experimental verification of the obtained results was carried out on the physical prototype under laboratory conditions. Results. Computer analysis, by means of the finite element method, determined the stress state by calculation of the maximum Von Mises stress and critical cross-sections for different angles of the resultant force action. The results obtained by the computer and experimental method correlate and are comparable to the results of similar analyses conducted on various endoprosthesis types. Conclusion. The analyses described in the paper make the basis for improving the process designing of hip joint endoprostheses and their customization to each individual patient (custom made).
References
Callaghan J, Rosenberg A, Rubash H. The adult hip. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007.
Heller MO, Bergmann G, Kassi JP, Claes L, Haas NP, Duda GN. Determination of muscle loading at the hip joint for use in pre-clinical testing. J Biomech 2005; 38(5): 1155−63.
Garellick G, Karrbolm J, Rogmark C, Herberts P. Annual Report 2010. Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register; 2011.
Katoozian H, Davy DT. Effects of loading conditions and objective function on three-dimensional shape optimization of femoral components of hip endoprostheses. Medical Engineering & Physics 2000; 22(4): 243−51.
Bennett D, Goswami T. Finite element analysis of hip stem de-signs. Materials & Design 2008; 29(1): 45−60.
Weinans H, Sumner DR, Igloria R, Natarajan RN. Sensitivity of periprosthetic stress-shielding to load and the bone density-modulus relationship in subject-specific finite element models. J Biomech 2000; 33(7): 809−17.
Schileo E, Taddei F, Cristofolini L, Viceconti M. Subject-specific finite element models implementing a maximum principal strain criterion are able to estimate failure risk and fracture lo-cation on human femurs tested in vitro. J Biomech 2008; 41(2): 356−67.
Peters CL, Bachus KN, Craig MA, Higginbotham TO. The effect of femoral prosthesis design on cement strain in cemented total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2001; 16(2): 216−24.
Bombeli R. Osteoarthritis of the hip: Classification and patho-genesis: the role of osteotomy as a consequent therapy. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1983.
Tabaković S, Živković A, Grujić J, Zeljković M. Using CAD/CAE software systems in the design process of modular, revision total hip endoprosthesis. AJME 2011; 9(2): 97−6.
An YH, Draughn RA. Mechanical testing of bone and the bone-implant interface. New York: Taylor & Francis; 2010.
Miles AW, Tanner KE. Strain Measurement in Biomechanics. London: Chapman & Hall; 1992.
