Challenges in treatment of postinfarction ventricular septal defect and heart failure

  • Ljupčo Mangovski Cardiovascular Institute “Dedinje”, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Rainer Kozlik-Feldmann Department of Pediatric Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine Ludwig-Maximilians-University Münich, Münich, Germany
  • Miodrag Perić Cardiovascular Institute “Dedinje”, Belgrade, Serbia; Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Ljiljana Jovović Cardiovascular Institute “Dedinje”, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Mihajlo Farkić Cardiovascular Institute “Dedinje”, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Dragica Dekić Cardiovascular Institute “Dedinje”, Belgrade, Serbia
Keywords: myocardial infarction, heart, septal defects, ventricular, heart failure, heart catheterization, treatment outcome,

Abstract


Introduction. Acquired ventricular septal defect (VSD) is uncommon, but serious mechanical complication of acute myocardial infarction with poor outcome and high mortality rate in surgically or medically treated patients. Case report. We report a 58-year-old male patient admitted to our hospital six days following acute inferior myocardial infarction complicated by ventricular septal rupture with signs of heart failure. Coronary angiography revealed 3-vessel disease, with proximally occluded dominant right coronary artery. Transthoracic echo exam revealed aneurysm of a very thin inferior septum and the basal portion of the inferior left ventricular wall, with septal wall rupture. One of the VSD dimensions was 15 mm and left- to right shunt was calculated 2 : 1. Since the patient was at too high risk for surgical closure, transcatheter closure of VSD was chosen as a better option. Under short intravenous sedation, 24 mm Amplatzer device was implanted percutaneously with transesophageal echo guidance. The post-procedural result revealed a small residual shunt, but it was followed by significant improvement of the patient’s clinical status. A 24h Holter ECG monitoring did not show cardiac rhythm or conduction disturbances. Coronary angiography was repeated ten days following the procedure, after hemodynamic stabilization of the patient, with direct stenting of the circumflex artery and the intermediate artery. Ostial left descending artery lesion was left for further functional significance assessment. Conclusion: Percutaneous closure with a septal occluder device can be definitive primary treatment for anatomically suitable patients or it can serve as a bridge to surgical treatment.

Author Biographies

Ljupčo Mangovski, Cardiovascular Institute “Dedinje”, Belgrade, Serbia

Cat lab

Msc

Rainer Kozlik-Feldmann, Department of Pediatric Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine Ludwig-Maximilians-University Münich, Münich, Germany
Department of Pediatrics
Miodrag Perić, Cardiovascular Institute “Dedinje”, Belgrade, Serbia; Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
Cardiac Surgery
Ljiljana Jovović, Cardiovascular Institute “Dedinje”, Belgrade, Serbia

Echo lab

Phd

Mihajlo Farkić, Cardiovascular Institute “Dedinje”, Belgrade, Serbia
Cat Lab
Dragica Dekić, Cardiovascular Institute “Dedinje”, Belgrade, Serbia

Echo lab

References

Crenshaw BS, Granger CB, Birnbaum Y, Pieper KS, Morris DC, Kleiman NS, et al.. Risk factors, angiographic patterns, and out-comes in patients with ventricular septal defect complicating acute myocardial infarction. GUSTO-I (Global Utilization of Streptokinase and TPA for Occluded Coronary Arteries) Trial Investigators. Circulation 2000; 101(1): 27−32.

Antman EM, Anbe DT, Armstrong PW, Bates ER, Green LA, Hand M, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction--executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiolo-gy/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1999 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Acute Myocardial In-farction). Circulation 2004; 110(5): 588−636.

Bouchart F, Bessou JP, Tabley A, Redonnet M, Mouton-Schleifer D, Haas-Hubscher C, et al. Urgent surgical repair of postinfarction ventricular septal rupture: early and late outcome. J Card Surg 1998; 13(2): 104−12.

Menon V, Webb JG, Hillis LD, Sleeper LA, Abboud R, Dzavik V, et al. Outcome and profile of ventricular septal rupture with cardiogenic shock after myocardial infarction: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry. Should we emergently revascularize Occluded Coronaries in cardiogenic shock. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 36(3 Suppl A): 1110−6.

Moore CA, Nygaard TW, Kaiser DL, Cooper AA, Gibson RS. Postinfarction ventricular septal rupture: the importance of lo-cation of infarction and right ventricular function in determin-ing survival. Circulation 1986; 74(1): 45−55.

Mantovani V, Mariscalco G, Leva C, Blanzola C, Sala A. Surgical repair of post-infarction ventricular septal defect: 19 years of experience. Int J Cardiol 2006; 108(2): 202−6.

Deja MA, Szostek J, Widenka K, Szafron B, Spyt TJ, Hickey MS, et al. Post infarction ventricular septal defect - can we do better. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2000; 18(2): 194−201.

Maltais S, Ibrahim R, Basmadjian A, Carrier M, Bouchard D, Cartier R, et al. Postinfarction ventricular septal defects: towards a new treatment algorithm. Ann Thorac Surg 2009; 87(3): 687−92.

Thiele H, Kaulfersch C, Daehnert I, Schoenauer M, Eitel I, Borger M, et al. Immediate primary transcatheter closure of postinfarction ventricular septal defects. Eur Heart J 2009; 30(1): 81−8.

Bialkowski J, Szkutnik M, Kusa J, Kalarus Z, Gasior M, Przybylski R, et al. Transcatheter closure of postinfarction ventricular septal defects using Amplatzer devices. Rev Esp Cardiol 2007; 60(5): 548−51. (Spanish)

Attia R, Blauth C. Which patients might be suitable for a septal occluder device closure of postinfarction ventricular septal rupture rather than immediate surgery. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2010; 11(5): 626−9.

Holzer R, Balzer D, Amin Z, Ruiz CE, Feinstein J, Bass J, et al. Transcatheter closure of postinfarction ventricular septal defects using the new Amplatzer muscular VSD occluder: Results of a U.S. Registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2004; 61(2): 196−201.

Published
2015/07/08
Section
Case report