Evaluating empathy in adolescents with conduct disorders
Abstract
Background/Aim. According to currently available data, there is no research dealing with evaluating empathy in adolescents with conduct disorders in our region. The aim of the research was to examine the differences in the severity of cognitive and affective empathy in adolescents with and with no conduct disorder, as well as to examine the relationship between cognitive and affective empathy and the level of externalization in adolescents with conduct disorder. Methods. This research was conducted on 171 adolescents, aged 15 to 18, using the Interpersonal Reactivity Index, Youth Self-Report and a Questionnaire constructed for the purpose of this research. Results. The results showed that adolescents with conduct disorder had significantly lower scores for Perspective Taking (t = 3.255, p = 0.001), Fantasy (t = 2.133, p = 0.034) and Empathic Concern (t = 2.479, p = 0.014) compared to the adolescents in the control group, while the values for Personal Distress (t = 1.818, p = 0.071) were higher compared to the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant. The study showed a statistically significant negative correlation between Perspective Taking and aggression (r = -0.318, p = 0.003) and a negative correlation between Perspective Taking and the overall level of externalizing problems (r = -0.310, p = 0.004) in the group of adolescents with conduct disorder. Conclusion. This research contributes to better understanding of behavioral disorders in terms of individual factors, especially empathic reactivity. Preventive work with young people who have behavioral problems associated with empathy deficit disorder proved to be an important tool in preventing the development, or at least relieving the symptoms, of this ever more common disorder.
References
Eisenberg N, Fabes RA. Empathy: Conceptualization, measure-ment, and relation to prosocial behavior. Motivation and Emotion 1990; 14(2): 131−49.
Davis MH. Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evi-dence for a multidimensional approach. J Pers Soc Psychol 1983; 44(1): 113−26.
Davis MH, Franzoi SL. Stability and change in adolescent self-consciousness and empathy. J Res Pers 1991; 25(1): 70−87.
Spreng NR, McKinnon MC, Mar RA, Levine B. The Toronto Empathy Questionnaire: Scale development and initial valida-tion of a factor-analytic solution to multiple empathy measures. J Pers Assess 2009; 91(1): 62−71.
Miller PA, Eisenberg N. The relation of empathy to aggressive and externalizing/antisocial behavior. Psychol Bull 1988; 103(3): 324−44.
Feschbach ND, Feschbach S. Empathy education. In: Decety J, Ickes W, editors. The Social Neuroscience of Empathy. Cam-bridge, Massachusetts, England: MIT Press; 2009. p. 85−97.
Strayer J, Roberts W. Empathy and observed anger and aggres-sion in five-year-olds. Soc Dev 2004; 13: 542−61.
de Wied M, de Wied CG, van Boxtel A. Empathy dysfunction in children and adolescents with disruptive behavior disorders. Eur J Pharma 2010; 626(1): 97−103.
Lovett BJ, Sheffield RA. Affective empathy deficits in aggressive children and adolescents: a critical review. Clin Psychol Rev 2007; 27(1): 1−13.
World Health Organization. The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: Diagnostic criteria for re-search. Geneve: World Health Organization; 1992.
Achenbach TM, Rescorla LA. Manual for the ASEBA school-age forms and profiles. Burlington: University of Vermont, Re-search Center for Children, Youth and Families; 2001.
Kostić J, Nešić M, Stanković M, Zikić O. Perceived parental ac-ceptance/rejection, some family characteristics and conduct disorder in adolescents. Vojnosanit Pregl 2014; 71(10): 942−8.
Cohen D. Empathy in Conduct Disorder Youth [thesis]. Cana-da, Burnaby BC: Department of Psychology, Simon Frazer University; 1992.
Cohen D, Strayer J. Empathy in conduct-disordered and com-parison youth. Dev Psychol 1996; 32(6): 988−98.
Wied M, Goudena PP, Matthys W. Empathy in boys with disrup-tive behavior disorders. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2005; 46(8): 867−80.
Lee M, Prentice NM. Interrelations of empathy, cognition, and moral reasoning with dimensions of juvenile delinquency. J Abnorm Child Psychol 1988; 16(2): 127−39.
Jolliffe D, Farrington DP. Empathy and offending: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aggress Violent Beh 2004; 9(5): 441−76.
Konrath SH, O'brien EH, Hsing C. Changes in dispositional em-pathy in american college students over time: a meta-analysis. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 2011; 15(2): 180−98.
Batson CD. The altruism question: toward a social psychological answer. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1991.
Eisenberg N, Eggum ND. Empathic responding: sympathy and personal distress. In: The social neuroscience of empathy. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press; 2009. p. 75−85.
Denham S. Emotional development in young children. New York: The Guilford Press; 1998.
Gini G, Albiero P, Benelli B, Altoè G. Does empathy predict ado-lescents' bullying and defending behavior. Aggress Beh 2007; 33(5): 467−76.
Beven J, Brien O, Mlaone A, Hall G. Using the Interpersonal Re-activity Index to Assess Empathy in Violent Offenders. Int J Forensic Psychol 2004; 1(2): 33−41.
Jolliffe D, Farrington DP. Examining the relationship between low empathy and bullying. Aggress Beh 2006; 32(6): 540−50.
Shechtman Z. Cognitive and affective empathy in aggressive boys: implications for counseling. Int J Adv Couns 2002; 24(4): 211−22.
Frick PJ, Dickens C. Current perspectives on conduct disorder. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2006; 8(1): 59−72.
Bjorkqvist K. Empathy, social intelligence and aggression in ad-olescent boys and girls. In: Farrow TF, Woodruff PW, editors. Empathy in mental illness. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2007. p. 360−86.
Pecukonis ED. A cognitive/affective empathy training program as a function of ego development in aggressive adolescent fe-males. Adolescence 1990; 25(97): 59−76.