Effects of combined special education treatment and occupational therapy on upper extremities motor skills in adult patients with hemiplegia
Abstract
Background/Aim. Stroke is the most common single cause of severe and multiple physical disabilities, and rehabilitation that reduces functional deficits is the most effective treatment. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of special education treatment as a supplement to occupational therapy on upper extremities motor skills in adult patients with post stroke hemiplegia. Methods. Standard education tests for motor function evaluation of the upper extremities: O`Connor, Ring and Hand grip test, were applied on a sample of 64 patients who were in the process of rehabilitation in the Clinic for Rehabilitation “Dr. Miroslav Zotović” in Belgrade. After the evaluation, all the participants were included in occupational therapy and divided in two intervention groups per 32 subjects each. The patients from the first experimental group received individually dosed special education treatment which was performed for at least 12 weeks as a supplement together with occupational therapy, while patients from the second experimental group were only in the process of occupational therapy without special education treatment. At the end of the study the same tests were used to re-evaluate the level of motor abilities of the patients in both groups. Results.The patients from the first experimental group with individually dosed special education treatment as a supplement showed significantly better scores after applying the treatment in all tested variables – explosive, static and dynamic muscular strength grip fist, as well as oculomotor skills at the level of the elbow and shoulder for both healthy and paretic hand. Conclusion. On the basis of the obtained results, it can be concluded that special education treatment added to occupational therapy lead to better performing of upper extremities motor skills and that it can be a good supplement to conventional occupational therapy methods and techniques.
References
Johnston CS, Mendis S, Mathers CD. Global variation in stroke burden and mortality: Estimates from monitoring, surveillance, and modelling. Lancet Neurol 2009; 8(4): 345−54.
Furie KL, Kasner SE, Adams RJ, Albers GW, Bush RL, Fagan SC, et al. Guidelines for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the american heart association/american stroke association. Stroke 2011; 42(1): 227−76.
Rosamond W, Flegal K, Friday G, Furie K, Go A, Greenlund K, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2007 update: A report from the American Heart Association statistics committee and stroke statistics subcommittee. Circulation 2007; 115(5): e69−171.
Kleindorfer D. The bad news: Stroke incidence is stable. Lancet Neurol 2007; 6(6): 470−1.
Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM, Benjamin EJ, Berry JD, Borden WB, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics--2012 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2012; 125(1): e2−e220.
Canadian Institute for Health Information. Canadian Institute for Health Information pilot project report: rehabilitation data standards for Canada. Ottawa: CIHI; 1999.
Walker MF, Gladman JR, Lincoln NB, Siemonsma P, Whiteley T. Occupational therapy for stroke patients not admitted to hos-pital: A randomized controlled trial. Lancet 1999; 354(9175): 278−80.
De Wit L, Putman K, Schuback B, Komárek A, Angst F, Baert I, et al. Motor and functional recovery after stroke: A comparison of 4 European rehabilitation centers. Stroke 2007; 38(7): 2101−7.
Wolf SL, Thompson PA, Winstein CJ, Miller JP, Blanton SR, Nichols-Larsen DS, et al. The EXCITE Stroke Trial. Comparing Early and Delayed Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy. Stroke 2010; 41(10): 2309−15.
Krug G, McCormack G. Occupational therapy: evidence-based interventions for stroke. Mo Med 2009; 106(2): 145−9.
McPherson KM, Kersten P, McNaughton H, Turner-Stokes L. Back-ground to neurorehabilitation. In: Candelise L, Hughes R, Liberati A, Uitdehag B, Warlow C, editors. Management of neurological disorders: An evidence-based approach. Edinburgh: Blackwell Publishing; 2007. p. 100−9.
Langhorne P, Coupar F, Pollock A. Motor recovery after stroke: A systematic review. Lancet Neurol 2009; 8(8): 741−54.
Harris JE, Eng JJ. Paretic upper-limb strength best explains arm activity in people with stroke. Phys Ther 2007; 87(1): 88−97.
Duncan PW, Sullivan KJ, Behrman AL, Azen SP, Wu SS, Nadeau SE, et al. Body-weight-supported treadmill rehabilitation after stroke. N Engl J Med 2011; 364(21): 2026−36.
Bobath B. Adult Hemiplegia: evaluation and treatment. 3rd ed. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann; 1990.
Tyson SF, Selley AB. The effect of perceived adherence to the Bobath concept on physiotherapists' choice of intervention used to treat postural control after stroke. Disabil Rehabil 2007; 29(5): 395−401.
Barker RN, Brauer SG. Upper limb recovery after stroke: The stroke survivors' perspective. Disabil Rehabil 2005; 27(20): 1213−23.
Vučić R, Marković P, Savković N. Clinical occupational therapy. 2nd ed. Belgrade: NIB Alternativa; 2001. (Serbian)
Nudo RJ, Wise BM, Sifuentes F, Milliken GW. Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery af-ter ischemic infarct. Science 1996; 272(5269): 1791−4.
Stošljević M. Basis of special education and rehabilitacion in people with motoric impairments. Belgrade: Društvo defekto-loga Srbije; 2013. (Serbian)
Stošljević M, Nikič R, Eminović F, Pacić S. Psychophysical handi-cap of children and youth. Belgrade: Društvo defektologa Srbije; 2013. (Serbian)
Arya KN, Verma R, Garg RK, Sharma VP, Agarwal M, Aggarwal GG. Meaningful task-specific training (MTST) for stroke reha-bilitation: a randomized controlled trial. Top Stroke Rehabil 2012; 19(3): 193−211.
Ma HI, Trombly CA. A synthesis of the effects of occupational therapy for persons with stroke, Part II: Remediation of im-pairments. Am J Occup Ther 2002; 56(3): 260−74.
Bowden MG, Woodbury ML, Duncan PW. Promoting neuroplas-ticity and recovery after stroke: Future directions for rehabilita-tion clinical trials. Curr Opin Neurol 2013; 26(1): 37−42.
Dos Santos-Fontes RL, Ferreiro de Andrade KN, Sterr A, Conforto AB. Home-based nerve stimulation to enhance effects of mo-tor training in patients in the chronic phase after stroke: a proof-of-principle study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2013; 27(6): 483−90.
Klaiput A, Kitisomprayoonkul W. Increased pinch strength in acute and subacute stroke patients after simultaneous median and ulnar sensory stimulation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009; 23(4): 351−6.
Lee NK, Son SM, Nam SH, Kwon JW, Kang KW, Kim K. Effects of progressive resistance training integrated with foot and an-kle compression on spatiotemporal gait parameters of individ-uals with stroke. J Phys Ther Sci 2013; 25(10): 1235−7.
French B, Thomas LH, Leathley MJ, Sutton CJ, Mcadam JA, Forster A, et al. Repetitive task training for improving functional ability after stroke. Stroke 2009; 40(4): 98−9.
Maitra KK, Telage KM, Rice MS. Self-speech-induced facilitation of simple reaching movements in persons with stroke. Am J Occup Ther 2006; 60(2): 146−54.
Ostry DJ, Cooke JD, Munhall KG. Velocity curves of human arm and speech movements. Exp Brain Res 1987; 68: 37−46.